NCT01106690

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receving treatment with metformin and pioglitazone and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
344

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Typical duration for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
11 countries

83 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2010

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 21, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

July 15, 2013

Status Verified

June 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2010

Results QC Date

April 2, 2013

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

CanagliflozinPlaceboSitagliptin (Januvia)MetforminPioglitazone (Actos)Hemoglobin A1cType 2 diabetes mellitus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

    The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

    Week 26

  • Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2-%B) From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Placebo/Sitagliptin

OTHER

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone. At Week 26, patients will be switched from placebo to 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone until Week 52.

Drug: PlaceboDrug: SitagliptinDrug: MetforminDrug: Pioglitazone

Canagliflozin 100 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Drug: CanagliflozinDrug: MetforminDrug: Pioglitazone

Canagliflozin 300 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Drug: CanagliflozinDrug: MetforminDrug: Pioglitazone

Interventions

One matching placebo capsule orally (by mouth) once daily for 26 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Placebo/Sitagliptin

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mg

One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily beginning at Week 26 until Week 52 with stable doses of metformin and pioglitazone.

Placebo/Sitagliptin

The patient's stable dose of metformin background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mgPlacebo/Sitagliptin

The patient's stable dose of pioglitazone background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mgPlacebo/Sitagliptin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with PPAR gamma agent ((pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) and another anti-diabetes agent (metformin)
  • Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between \>=7 and \<=10.5% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)

You may not qualify if:

  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy
  • or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (83)

Unknown Facility

Anniston, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Burlingame, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Encinitas, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fullerton, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Roseville, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Ana, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wes Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bartow, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chaska, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Billings, Montana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dublin, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Yukon, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Grand Prairie, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Federal Way, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Selah, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bathurst, New Brunswick, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Grand Falls-Windsor, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Drummondville, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Calgary, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Mount Pearl, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Truro, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuopio, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Oulu, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Turku, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bondy, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Le Creusot, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Narbonne, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Aschaffenburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Mainz, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Neuwied, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Schkeuditz, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Athens, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Thessaloniki, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Thessalonikis, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Ahmedabad, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Belagavi, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Chennai, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Coimbatore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Jaipur, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagpur, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Chihuahua City, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Ciudad Juárez, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Durango, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

México, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Almería, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Seville, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangkok, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Khon Kaen, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Antrim, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Belfast, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Davies MJ, Merton K, Vijapurkar U, Yee J, Qiu R. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes based on history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors: a post hoc analysis of pooled data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Mar 21;16(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0517-7.

  • Pfeifer M, Townsend RR, Davies MJ, Vijapurkar U, Ren J. Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Feb 27;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0511-0.

  • Gilbert RE, Mende C, Vijapurkar U, Sha S, Davies MJ, Desai M. Effects of Canagliflozin on Serum Magnesium in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Post Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0232-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

  • Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

  • John M, Cerdas S, Violante R, Deerochanawong C, Hassanein M, Slee A, Canovatchel W, Hamilton G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in hot climates. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70(9):775-85. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12868.

  • Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  • Blonde L, Woo V, Mathieu C, Yee J, Vijapurkar U, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Achievement of treatment goals with canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Nov;31(11):1993-2000. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1082991. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

  • Gavin JR 3rd, Davies MJ, Davies M, Vijapurkar U, Alba M, Meininger G. The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(9):1693-702. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1067192. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

  • Cefalu WT, Stenlof K, Leiter LA, Wilding JP, Blonde L, Polidori D, Xie J, Sullivan D, Usiskin K, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and relationship to HbA1c and blood pressure changes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015 Jun;58(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3547-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

  • Weir MR, Januszewicz A, Gilbert RE, Vijapurkar U, Kline I, Fung A, Meininger G. Effect of canagliflozin on blood pressure and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):875-82. doi: 10.1111/jch.12425. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

  • Usiskin K, Kline I, Fung A, Mayer C, Meininger G. Safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of phase 3 study results. Postgrad Med. 2014 May;126(3):16-34. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2753.

  • Weir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.

  • Sinclair A, Bode B, Harris S, Vijapurkar U, Mayer C, Fung A, Shaw W, Usiskin K, Desai M, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014 Apr 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-37.

  • Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

CanagliflozinSitagliptin PhosphateMetforminPioglitazone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsGlucosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesTriazolesAzolesPyrazinesBiguanidesGuanidinesAmidinesThiazolidinedionesThiazoles

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2010

First Posted

April 20, 2010

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2011

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 15, 2013

Results First Posted

May 21, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-06

Locations