A Safety and Efficacy Study of Canagliflozin in Older Patients (55 to 80 Years of Age) With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Glucose Lowering Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
716
17 countries
86
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients (55 to 80 years of age) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate control on their current diabetes treatment regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jun 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
86 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 29, 2013
CompletedNovember 4, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.4 years
April 1, 2010
April 1, 2013
October 27, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26
Week 26
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Change in Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Change in Region Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Canagliflozin 100 mg
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Canagliflozin 300 mg
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOREach patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Interventions
One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
One 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Stable doses of antihyperglycemic agents (sulfonylurea agent, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 \[DPP-4\] inhibitors, metformin, insulin \[all types\]) and their combinations (sulfonylurea agent and insulin \[all types\], metformin and insulin \[all types\], metformin and sulfonylurea, alpha glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 \[DPP-4\]) are used as per protocol specifications.
One matching placebo capsule orally once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and may be currently treated with a stable regimen of antihyperglycemic agent(s)
- Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between \>=7 and \<=10.0%
- Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)
You may not qualify if:
- History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (86)
Unknown Facility
Glendale, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Carmichael, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Citrus Heights, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Fair Oaks, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Roseville, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Sacramento, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Walnut Creek, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fleming Island, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Pahrump, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Unknown Facility
Cary, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Bismarck, North Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Franklin, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Carrollton, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Irving, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Plano, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Richardson, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Renton, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Wenatchee, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Fremantle, Australia
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg Heights, Australia
Unknown Facility
Meadowbrook, Australia
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Australia
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Unknown Facility
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Markham, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Barranquilla, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Bogotá, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Corbeil-Essonnes, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Vénissieux, France
Unknown Facility
Thessaloniki, Greece
Unknown Facility
Thessalonikis, Greece
Unknown Facility
Shatin, Hong Kong
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, India
Unknown Facility
Nagpur, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, India
Unknown Facility
Auckland, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Christchurch, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Tauranga, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Wellington, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Katowice, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Sibiu, Romania
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Granada, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain
Unknown Facility
Seville, Spain
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Uppsala, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Bruderholz, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Cardiff, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Liverpool, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Reading, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Salford, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Januzzi JL Jr, Butler J, Jarolim P, Sattar N, Vijapurkar U, Desai M, Davies MJ. Effects of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):704-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
PMID: 28619659DERIVEDQiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
PMID: 27977934DERIVEDBlonde L, Stenlof K, Fung A, Xie J, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. Postgrad Med. 2016 May;128(4):371-80. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1169894. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
PMID: 27002421DERIVEDWatts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PMID: 26580237DERIVEDBilezikian JP, Watts NB, Usiskin K, Polidori D, Fung A, Sullivan D, Rosenthal N. Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Biomarkers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Canagliflozin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):44-51. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1860. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PMID: 26580234DERIVEDWeir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.
PMID: 24786834DERIVEDNyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
PMID: 24517339DERIVEDBode B, Stenlof K, Sullivan D, Fung A, Usiskin K. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract (1995). 2013 Apr;41(2):72-84. doi: 10.3810/hp.2013.04.1020.
PMID: 23680739DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2010
First Posted
April 20, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 4, 2014
Results First Posted
May 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2014-10