NCT01106651

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients (55 to 80 years of age) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate control on their current diabetes treatment regimen.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
716

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
17 countries

86 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2010

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2011

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 29, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 4, 2014

Status Verified

October 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2010

Results QC Date

April 1, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 27, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

CanagliflozinPlaceboHemoglobin A1cBoneType 2 diabetes mellitus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

    The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

    Week 26

  • Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Change in Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Change in Region Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Canagliflozin 100 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Drug: Canagliflozin 100 mgDrug: Antihyperglycemic agent(s)

Canagliflozin 300 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Drug: Canagliflozin 300 mgDrug: Antihyperglycemic agent(s)

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Drug: Antihyperglycemic agent(s)Drug: Placebo

Interventions

One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Canagliflozin 100 mg

One 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Canagliflozin 300 mg

Stable doses of antihyperglycemic agents (sulfonylurea agent, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 \[DPP-4\] inhibitors, metformin, insulin \[all types\]) and their combinations (sulfonylurea agent and insulin \[all types\], metformin and insulin \[all types\], metformin and sulfonylurea, alpha glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 \[DPP-4\]) are used as per protocol specifications.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mgPlacebo

One matching placebo capsule orally once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and may be currently treated with a stable regimen of antihyperglycemic agent(s)
  • Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between \>=7 and \<=10.0%
  • Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)

You may not qualify if:

  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (86)

Unknown Facility

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carmichael, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Citrus Heights, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fair Oaks, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Roseville, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sacramento, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fleming Island, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Waltham, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pahrump, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Irving, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Plano, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Richardson, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Renton, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wenatchee, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fremantle, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Heidelberg Heights, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Meadowbrook, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Markham, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Barranquilla, Colombia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bogotá, Colombia

Location

Unknown Facility

Corbeil-Essonnes, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Paris, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Vénissieux, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Thessaloniki, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Thessalonikis, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Shatin, Hong Kong

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangalore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagpur, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Pune, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Auckland, New Zealand

Location

Unknown Facility

Christchurch, New Zealand

Location

Unknown Facility

Tauranga, New Zealand

Location

Unknown Facility

Wellington, New Zealand

Location

Unknown Facility

Katowice, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Sibiu, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Granada, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Seville, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Gothenburg, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Uppsala, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Bruderholz, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Sankt Gallen, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiev, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Cardiff, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Glasgow, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Liverpool, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Reading, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Salford, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Januzzi JL Jr, Butler J, Jarolim P, Sattar N, Vijapurkar U, Desai M, Davies MJ. Effects of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):704-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

  • Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

  • Blonde L, Stenlof K, Fung A, Xie J, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. Postgrad Med. 2016 May;128(4):371-80. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1169894. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

  • Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  • Bilezikian JP, Watts NB, Usiskin K, Polidori D, Fung A, Sullivan D, Rosenthal N. Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Biomarkers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Canagliflozin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):44-51. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1860. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  • Weir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.

  • Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

  • Bode B, Stenlof K, Sullivan D, Fung A, Usiskin K. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract (1995). 2013 Apr;41(2):72-84. doi: 10.3810/hp.2013.04.1020.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

Canagliflozin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsGlucosidesGlycosidesCarbohydrates

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2010

First Posted

April 20, 2010

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2011

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

November 4, 2014

Results First Posted

May 29, 2013

Record last verified: 2014-10

Locations