NCT00968812

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate control despite treatment with metformin.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
1,452

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Longer than P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
20 countries

138 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 28, 2009

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 4, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

January 30, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

August 28, 2009

Results QC Date

April 17, 2013

Last Update Submit

December 1, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

DiabetesMetforminGlimepirideHemoglobin A1cType 2 diabetes mellitusCanagliflozin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

    The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change.

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Event From Baseline to Week 52

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

  • Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 104

    Baseline, Week 104

Study Arms (3)

Glimepiride

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each patient will receive glimepiride, at protocol-specified doses, once daily in combination with protocol-specified doses of metformin for 104 weeks.

Drug: GlimepirideDrug: Metformin

Canagliflozin 100 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) once daily with protocol-specified doses of metformin for 104 weeks.

Drug: Canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754)Drug: Metformin

Canagliflozin 300 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each volunteer will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) once daily with protocol-specified doses of metformin for 104 weeks.

Drug: Canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754)Drug: Metformin

Interventions

Glimepiride will be given orally (by mouth), as over-encapsulated tablets, starting at a dose of 1mg once daily and increasing to a maximum of 6 mg or 8 mg once daily for 104 weeks.

Also known as: sulfonylurea
Glimepiride

Canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) will be given orally as over-encapsulated tablets, at a dose of 100 mg or 300 mg once daily for 104 weeks.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mg

Metformin will be given orally at the protocol-specified dose for 104 weeks.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mgGlimepiride

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
  • Body mass index (BMI) \>=22 to \<=45 kg/m2, at screening
  • Patients must be taking a stable dosage of metformin as monotherapy at screening
  • Patients must have a HbA1c between \>=7% and \<=9.5% at Week 2
  • Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<=270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L) at Week -2

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients having prior exposure or known contraindication or suspected hypersensitivity to JNJ-28431754, glimepiride, or metformin
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis or type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • History of pancreas or beta-cell transplantation
  • History of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy
  • History of hereditary glucose-galactose malabsorption or primary renal glucosuria
  • Renal disease requiring treatment with immunosuppressive therapy within the past 12 months before screening or a history of dialysis or renal transplant
  • Taken thiazolidinedione therapy in the past 16 weeks before screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (138)

Unknown Facility

Calera, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buena Park, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Encinitas, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fresno, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lincoln, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Roseville, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Westlake Village, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chipley, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Marianna, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oldsmar, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Perry, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Elkridge, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Canal Fulton, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mason, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Yukon, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Odessa, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pearland, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Danville, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Olympia, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Mar del Plata, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Rosario, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Dimitrovgrad, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Kazanlak, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Rousse, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

San José, Costa Rica

Location

Unknown Facility

San Pedro, Costa Rica

Location

Unknown Facility

Aalborg, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Ballerup Municipality, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Vejle, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Vipperoed, Denmark

Location

Unknown Facility

Helsinki, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kokkola, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuopio, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Oulu, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Turku, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Dresden, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Düsseldorf, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Mainz, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangalore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Chennai, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Coimbatore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Hyderabad, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagpur, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Pune, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Wardha, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Beersheba, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Haifa, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Holon, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Jerusalem, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Ramat Gan, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Rehovot, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Safed, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

Unknown Facility

Mexico City, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

México, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Monterrey, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Ålesund, Norway

Location

Unknown Facility

Oslo, Norway

Location

Unknown Facility

Cebu, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Marikina City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Pasay, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Quezon City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kutno, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Zielona Góra, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Ponce, Puerto Rico

Location

Unknown Facility

Baia Mare, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Brasov, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Galati, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Ploieşti, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Târgu Mureş, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Arkhangelsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Moscow, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Samara, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saratov, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bratislava, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ľubochňa, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prešov, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Daegu, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Goyang-si, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Suwon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Wŏnju, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Dnipro, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiev, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Poltava, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Ternopil, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Vinnitsa, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Natale P, Tunnicliffe DJ, Toyama T, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Ruospo M, Gargano L, Stallone G, Gesualdo L, Strippoli GF. Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD015588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015588.pub2.

  • Heerspink HJL, Perco P, Mulder S, Leierer J, Hansen MK, Heinzel A, Mayer G. Canagliflozin reduces inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers: a potential mechanism of action for beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease. Diabetologia. 2019 Jul;62(7):1154-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4859-4. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

  • Garvey WT, Van Gaal L, Leiter LA, Vijapurkar U, List J, Cuddihy R, Ren J, Davies MJ. Effects of canagliflozin versus glimepiride on adipokines and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 2018 Aug;85:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

  • Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

  • John M, Cerdas S, Violante R, Deerochanawong C, Hassanein M, Slee A, Canovatchel W, Hamilton G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in hot climates. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70(9):775-85. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12868.

  • Patel CA, Bailey RA, Vijapurkar U, Meininger G, Blonde L. A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 5;16(a):356. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1607-z.

  • Blonde L, Stenlof K, Fung A, Xie J, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. Postgrad Med. 2016 May;128(4):371-80. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1169894. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

  • Leiter LA, Langslet G, Vijapurkar U, Davies MJ, Canovatchel W. Simultaneous Reduction in Both HbA1c and Body Weight with Canagliflozin Versus Glimepiride in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Jun;7(2):269-78. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0163-1. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

  • Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  • Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Eliaschewitz FG, Cerdas S, Chacon Mdel P, Tong C, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):427-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1121865. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

  • Leiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, Langslet G, Xie J, Balis DA, Millington D, Vercruysse F, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Diabetes Care. 2015 Mar;38(3):355-64. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2762. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

  • Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

  • Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, Niskanen L, Xie J, Balis DA, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013 Sep 14;382(9896):941-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60683-2. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetes Mellitus

Interventions

glimepirideSulfonylurea CompoundsCanagliflozinMetformin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UreaAmidesOrganic ChemicalsSulfonesSulfur CompoundsThiophenesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsGlucosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesBiguanidesGuanidinesAmidines

Limitations and Caveats

No notable study limitations were identified by the Sponsor.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2009

First Posted

August 31, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 30, 2017

Results First Posted

June 4, 2013

Record last verified: 2016-12

Locations