CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis-Sulfonylurea (CANTATA-SU) SGLT2 Add-on to Metformin Versus Glimepiride
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Controlled on Metformin Monotherapy
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,452
20 countries
138
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate control despite treatment with metformin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Sep 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
138 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2013
CompletedJanuary 30, 2017
December 1, 2016
2.2 years
August 28, 2009
April 17, 2013
December 1, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change.
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Event From Baseline to Week 52
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 104
Baseline, Week 104
Study Arms (3)
Glimepiride
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach patient will receive glimepiride, at protocol-specified doses, once daily in combination with protocol-specified doses of metformin for 104 weeks.
Canagliflozin 100 mg
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) once daily with protocol-specified doses of metformin for 104 weeks.
Canagliflozin 300 mg
EXPERIMENTALEach volunteer will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) once daily with protocol-specified doses of metformin for 104 weeks.
Interventions
Glimepiride will be given orally (by mouth), as over-encapsulated tablets, starting at a dose of 1mg once daily and increasing to a maximum of 6 mg or 8 mg once daily for 104 weeks.
Canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) will be given orally as over-encapsulated tablets, at a dose of 100 mg or 300 mg once daily for 104 weeks.
Metformin will be given orally at the protocol-specified dose for 104 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes
- Body mass index (BMI) \>=22 to \<=45 kg/m2, at screening
- Patients must be taking a stable dosage of metformin as monotherapy at screening
- Patients must have a HbA1c between \>=7% and \<=9.5% at Week 2
- Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<=270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L) at Week -2
You may not qualify if:
- Patients having prior exposure or known contraindication or suspected hypersensitivity to JNJ-28431754, glimepiride, or metformin
- History of diabetic ketoacidosis or type 1 diabetes mellitus
- History of pancreas or beta-cell transplantation
- History of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy
- History of hereditary glucose-galactose malabsorption or primary renal glucosuria
- Renal disease requiring treatment with immunosuppressive therapy within the past 12 months before screening or a history of dialysis or renal transplant
- Taken thiazolidinedione therapy in the past 16 weeks before screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (138)
Unknown Facility
Calera, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Buena Park, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Encinitas, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Roseville, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Westlake Village, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Chipley, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Marianna, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Oldsmar, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Perry, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Nampa, Idaho, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Vernon Hills, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Valparaiso, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Elkridge, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Canal Fulton, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Gallipolis, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Mason, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Perrysburg, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Yukon, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Odessa, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Pearland, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Danville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Olympia, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Mar del Plata, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Dimitrovgrad, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Kazanlak, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Rousse, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Unknown Facility
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Unknown Facility
San José, Costa Rica
Unknown Facility
San Pedro, Costa Rica
Unknown Facility
Aalborg, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Ballerup Municipality, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Vejle, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Vipperoed, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Helsinki, Finland
Unknown Facility
Kokkola, Finland
Unknown Facility
Kuopio, Finland
Unknown Facility
Oulu, Finland
Unknown Facility
Turku, Finland
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Dresden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mainz, Germany
Unknown Facility
Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, India
Unknown Facility
Chennai, India
Unknown Facility
Coimbatore, India
Unknown Facility
Hyderabad, India
Unknown Facility
Nagpur, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, India
Unknown Facility
Wardha, India
Unknown Facility
Beersheba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Holon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, Israel
Unknown Facility
Rehovot, Israel
Unknown Facility
Safed, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Mexico City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
México, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Ålesund, Norway
Unknown Facility
Oslo, Norway
Unknown Facility
Cebu, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Marikina City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Pasay, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Quezon City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kutno, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Zielona Góra, Poland
Unknown Facility
Ponce, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Baia Mare, Romania
Unknown Facility
Brasov, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Unknown Facility
Galati, Romania
Unknown Facility
Ploieşti, Romania
Unknown Facility
Târgu Mureş, Romania
Unknown Facility
Arkhangelsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Samara, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saratov, Russia
Unknown Facility
Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Ľubochňa, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Prešov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Daegu, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Goyang-si, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Incheon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Suwon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Wŏnju, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Dnipro, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Poltava, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ternopil, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Vinnitsa, Ukraine
Related Publications (13)
Natale P, Tunnicliffe DJ, Toyama T, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Ruospo M, Gargano L, Stallone G, Gesualdo L, Strippoli GF. Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD015588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015588.pub2.
PMID: 38770818DERIVEDHeerspink HJL, Perco P, Mulder S, Leierer J, Hansen MK, Heinzel A, Mayer G. Canagliflozin reduces inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers: a potential mechanism of action for beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease. Diabetologia. 2019 Jul;62(7):1154-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4859-4. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PMID: 31001673DERIVEDGarvey WT, Van Gaal L, Leiter LA, Vijapurkar U, List J, Cuddihy R, Ren J, Davies MJ. Effects of canagliflozin versus glimepiride on adipokines and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 2018 Aug;85:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
PMID: 29452178DERIVEDQiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
PMID: 27977934DERIVEDJohn M, Cerdas S, Violante R, Deerochanawong C, Hassanein M, Slee A, Canovatchel W, Hamilton G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in hot climates. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70(9):775-85. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12868.
PMID: 27600862DERIVEDPatel CA, Bailey RA, Vijapurkar U, Meininger G, Blonde L. A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 5;16(a):356. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1607-z.
PMID: 27495291DERIVEDBlonde L, Stenlof K, Fung A, Xie J, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. Postgrad Med. 2016 May;128(4):371-80. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1169894. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
PMID: 27002421DERIVEDLeiter LA, Langslet G, Vijapurkar U, Davies MJ, Canovatchel W. Simultaneous Reduction in Both HbA1c and Body Weight with Canagliflozin Versus Glimepiride in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Jun;7(2):269-78. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0163-1. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PMID: 26984361DERIVEDWatts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PMID: 26580237DERIVEDLavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Eliaschewitz FG, Cerdas S, Chacon Mdel P, Tong C, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):427-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1121865. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PMID: 26579834DERIVEDLeiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, Langslet G, Xie J, Balis DA, Millington D, Vercruysse F, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Diabetes Care. 2015 Mar;38(3):355-64. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2762. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PMID: 25205142DERIVEDNyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
PMID: 24517339DERIVEDCefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, Niskanen L, Xie J, Balis DA, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013 Sep 14;382(9896):941-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60683-2. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
PMID: 23850055DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
No notable study limitations were identified by the Sponsor.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2009
First Posted
August 31, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 30, 2017
Results First Posted
June 4, 2013
Record last verified: 2016-12