NCT01106677

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receiving treatment with metformin monotherapy (i.e., treatment with a single drug) and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
1,284

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2010

Typical duration for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
22 countries

125 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2010

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 20, 2010

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2010

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 30, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2013

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2010

Results QC Date

April 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 25, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes mellitusCanagliflozinPlaceboSitagliptinJanuviaMetformin Immediate Release (IR)Hemoglobin A1c

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

    The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

    Week 26

  • Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Change in 2-hour Post-prandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

    Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Canagliflozin 100 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Drug: CanagliflozinDrug: Metformin immediate release

Canagliflozin 300 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Drug: CanagliflozinDrug: Metformin immediate release

Sitagliptin 100 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each patient will receive 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Drug: SitagliptinDrug: Metformin immediate release

Placebo/Sitagliptin

OTHER

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 26 weeks and will then switch from placebo to 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily until Week 52. Placebo and sitagliptin will be given with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Drug: PlaceboDrug: SitagliptinDrug: Metformin immediate release

Interventions

One matching placebo capsule orally (by mouth) once daily for 26 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Placebo/Sitagliptin

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mg

One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks (sitagliptin 100 mg arm) or once daily beginning at Week 26 until Week 52 (placebo/sitagliptin arm). Sitagliptin will be given with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.

Placebo/SitagliptinSitagliptin 100 mg

The patient's stable dose of metformin immediate release background therapy should be continued throughout the study.

Canagliflozin 100 mgCanagliflozin 300 mgPlacebo/SitagliptinSitagliptin 100 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with metformin IR
  • Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between \>=7 and \<=10.5%
  • Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)

You may not qualify if:

  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (125)

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

National City, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Northridge, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

DeFuniak Springs, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Niceville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Avon, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fishers, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Franklin, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Munfordville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Maine, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Benzonia, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Interlochen, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Troy, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mansfield, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oregon City, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

East Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Braunfels, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spokane, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Mendoza, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

San Juan, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sevlievo, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Barranquilla, Colombia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bogotá, Colombia

Location

Unknown Facility

Medellín, Colombia

Location

Unknown Facility

Beroun, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Pardubice, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Pilsen, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tábor, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tallinn, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Piraeus, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Thessalonikis, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Aurangabad, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangalore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Belagavi, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Coimbatore, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Mumbai, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagpur, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Pune, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Trivandrum, India

Location

Unknown Facility

Daugavpils, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Limbaži, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Riga, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Talsi, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kelantan, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuala Selangor, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Culiacán, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Guadalajara, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Monterrey, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Querétaro, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampico, Mexico

Location

Unknown Facility

Lima 1 Lima Lima, Peru

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Zgierz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Łęczyca, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Aveiro, Portugal

Location

Unknown Facility

Leiria, Portugal

Location

Unknown Facility

Lisbon, Portugal

Location

Unknown Facility

Portalegre, Portugal

Location

Unknown Facility

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Location

Unknown Facility

Chelyabinsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Dzerzhinsky Moscow Region, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kemerovo, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Penza, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Yekaterinburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Singapore, Singapore

Location

Unknown Facility

Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bratislava, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Košice, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Šahy, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Trebišov, Slovakia

Location

Unknown Facility

Gothenburg, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangkok, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Chiang Mai, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Khon Kaen, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Unknown Facility

Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Unknown Facility

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Unknown Facility

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Unknown Facility

Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Unknown Facility

Donetsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiev, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Sumy, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Vinnitsa, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Cai J, Delahanty LM, Akapame S, Slee A, Traina S. Impact of Canagliflozin Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes from Randomized Controlled Trials. Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):341-352. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0290-4.

  • Davies MJ, Merton K, Vijapurkar U, Yee J, Qiu R. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes based on history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors: a post hoc analysis of pooled data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Mar 21;16(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0517-7.

  • Pfeifer M, Townsend RR, Davies MJ, Vijapurkar U, Ren J. Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Feb 27;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0511-0.

  • Gilbert RE, Mende C, Vijapurkar U, Sha S, Davies MJ, Desai M. Effects of Canagliflozin on Serum Magnesium in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Post Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0232-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

  • Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

  • John M, Cerdas S, Violante R, Deerochanawong C, Hassanein M, Slee A, Canovatchel W, Hamilton G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in hot climates. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70(9):775-85. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12868.

  • Schernthaner G, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Davidson JA, Jodon H, Vijapurkar U, Qiu R, Canovatchel W. Canagliflozin provides greater attainment of both HbA1c and body weight reduction versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2016 Nov;128(8):725-730. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1210988. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

  • Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

  • Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Eliaschewitz FG, Cerdas S, Chacon Mdel P, Tong C, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):427-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1121865. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

  • Blonde L, Woo V, Mathieu C, Yee J, Vijapurkar U, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Achievement of treatment goals with canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Nov;31(11):1993-2000. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1082991. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

  • Gavin JR 3rd, Davies MJ, Davies M, Vijapurkar U, Alba M, Meininger G. The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(9):1693-702. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1067192. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

  • Cefalu WT, Stenlof K, Leiter LA, Wilding JP, Blonde L, Polidori D, Xie J, Sullivan D, Usiskin K, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and relationship to HbA1c and blood pressure changes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015 Jun;58(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3547-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

  • Bailey RA, Vijapurkar U, Meininger G, Rupnow MF, Blonde L. Diabetes-Related Composite Quality End Point Attainment: Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin Based on a Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials. Clin Ther. 2015 May 1;37(5):1045-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

  • Weir MR, Januszewicz A, Gilbert RE, Vijapurkar U, Kline I, Fung A, Meininger G. Effect of canagliflozin on blood pressure and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):875-82. doi: 10.1111/jch.12425. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

  • Usiskin K, Kline I, Fung A, Mayer C, Meininger G. Safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of phase 3 study results. Postgrad Med. 2014 May;126(3):16-34. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2753.

  • Weir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.

  • Sinclair A, Bode B, Harris S, Vijapurkar U, Mayer C, Fung A, Shaw W, Usiskin K, Desai M, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014 Apr 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-37.

  • Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

  • Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Januszewicz A, Davidson J, Tong C, Qiu R, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2013 Dec;56(12):2582-92. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

CanagliflozinSitagliptin PhosphateMetformin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsGlucosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesTriazolesAzolesPyrazinesBiguanidesGuanidinesAmidines

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2010

First Posted

April 20, 2010

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

May 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 30, 2013

Results First Posted

July 30, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-07

Locations