The CANTATA-D Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment and Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Comparator Trial)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, 4-Arm, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,284
22 countries
125
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receiving treatment with metformin monotherapy (i.e., treatment with a single drug) and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started May 2010
Typical duration for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
125 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2013
CompletedJuly 30, 2013
July 1, 2013
1.4 years
April 1, 2010
April 4, 2013
July 25, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26
Week 26
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Change in 2-hour Post-prandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 26
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Canagliflozin 100 mg
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
Canagliflozin 300 mg
EXPERIMENTALEach patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
Sitagliptin 100 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach patient will receive 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
Placebo/Sitagliptin
OTHEREach patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 26 weeks and will then switch from placebo to 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily until Week 52. Placebo and sitagliptin will be given with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
Interventions
One matching placebo capsule orally (by mouth) once daily for 26 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily for 52 weeks (sitagliptin 100 mg arm) or once daily beginning at Week 26 until Week 52 (placebo/sitagliptin arm). Sitagliptin will be given with protocol-specified doses of metformin immediate release.
The patient's stable dose of metformin immediate release background therapy should be continued throughout the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with metformin IR
- Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between \>=7 and \<=10.5%
- Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \<270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)
You may not qualify if:
- History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (125)
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Unknown Facility
National City, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Northridge, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooksville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
DeFuniak Springs, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Niceville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Champaign, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Fishers, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Franklin, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Munfordville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Maine, United States
Unknown Facility
Benzonia, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Interlochen, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Troy, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Picayune, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Florissant, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Mansfield, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Asheboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Kettering, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oregon City, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
East Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Greer, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
New Braunfels, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bountiful, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Mendoza, Argentina
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Pleven, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sevlievo, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Barranquilla, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Bogotá, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Medellín, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Beroun, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pardubice, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pilsen, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Tábor, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Tallinn, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Piraeus, Greece
Unknown Facility
Thessalonikis, Greece
Unknown Facility
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Unknown Facility
Aurangabad, India
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, India
Unknown Facility
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Unknown Facility
Belagavi, India
Unknown Facility
Coimbatore, India
Unknown Facility
Mumbai, India
Unknown Facility
Nagpur, India
Unknown Facility
Pune, India
Unknown Facility
Trivandrum, India
Unknown Facility
Daugavpils, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Limbaži, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Talsi, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Kelantan, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Kuala Selangor, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Culiacán, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Querétaro, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Tampico, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Lima 1 Lima Lima, Peru
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Zgierz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Łęczyca, Poland
Unknown Facility
Aveiro, Portugal
Unknown Facility
Leiria, Portugal
Unknown Facility
Lisbon, Portugal
Unknown Facility
Portalegre, Portugal
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Unknown Facility
Chelyabinsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Dzerzhinsky Moscow Region, Russia
Unknown Facility
Kemerovo, Russia
Unknown Facility
Penza, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yekaterinburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Singapore, Singapore
Unknown Facility
Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Košice, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Šahy, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Trebišov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Gothenburg, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Stockholm, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Bangkok, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Khon Kaen, Thailand
Unknown Facility
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Donetsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Sumy, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Vinnitsa, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Related Publications (19)
Cai J, Delahanty LM, Akapame S, Slee A, Traina S. Impact of Canagliflozin Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes from Randomized Controlled Trials. Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):341-352. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0290-4.
PMID: 29313267DERIVEDDavies MJ, Merton K, Vijapurkar U, Yee J, Qiu R. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes based on history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors: a post hoc analysis of pooled data. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Mar 21;16(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0517-7.
PMID: 28327140DERIVEDPfeifer M, Townsend RR, Davies MJ, Vijapurkar U, Ren J. Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Feb 27;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0511-0.
PMID: 28241822DERIVEDGilbert RE, Mende C, Vijapurkar U, Sha S, Davies MJ, Desai M. Effects of Canagliflozin on Serum Magnesium in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Post Hoc Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0232-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PMID: 28197834DERIVEDQiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
PMID: 27977934DERIVEDJohn M, Cerdas S, Violante R, Deerochanawong C, Hassanein M, Slee A, Canovatchel W, Hamilton G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in hot climates. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;70(9):775-85. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12868.
PMID: 27600862DERIVEDSchernthaner G, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Davidson JA, Jodon H, Vijapurkar U, Qiu R, Canovatchel W. Canagliflozin provides greater attainment of both HbA1c and body weight reduction versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2016 Nov;128(8):725-730. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1210988. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
PMID: 27391951DERIVEDWatts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PMID: 26580237DERIVEDLavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Eliaschewitz FG, Cerdas S, Chacon Mdel P, Tong C, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):427-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1121865. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
PMID: 26579834DERIVEDBlonde L, Woo V, Mathieu C, Yee J, Vijapurkar U, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Achievement of treatment goals with canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Nov;31(11):1993-2000. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1082991. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
PMID: 26373629DERIVEDGavin JR 3rd, Davies MJ, Davies M, Vijapurkar U, Alba M, Meininger G. The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin across racial groups in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(9):1693-702. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1067192. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
PMID: 26121561DERIVEDCefalu WT, Stenlof K, Leiter LA, Wilding JP, Blonde L, Polidori D, Xie J, Sullivan D, Usiskin K, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and relationship to HbA1c and blood pressure changes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015 Jun;58(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3547-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
PMID: 25813214DERIVEDBailey RA, Vijapurkar U, Meininger G, Rupnow MF, Blonde L. Diabetes-Related Composite Quality End Point Attainment: Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin Based on a Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials. Clin Ther. 2015 May 1;37(5):1045-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PMID: 25795432DERIVEDWeir MR, Januszewicz A, Gilbert RE, Vijapurkar U, Kline I, Fung A, Meininger G. Effect of canagliflozin on blood pressure and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis and reduced intravascular volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):875-82. doi: 10.1111/jch.12425. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
PMID: 25329038DERIVEDUsiskin K, Kline I, Fung A, Mayer C, Meininger G. Safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of phase 3 study results. Postgrad Med. 2014 May;126(3):16-34. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.05.2753.
PMID: 24918789DERIVEDWeir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.
PMID: 24786834DERIVEDSinclair A, Bode B, Harris S, Vijapurkar U, Mayer C, Fung A, Shaw W, Usiskin K, Desai M, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014 Apr 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-37.
PMID: 24742013DERIVEDNyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
PMID: 24517339DERIVEDLavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Januszewicz A, Davidson J, Tong C, Qiu R, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2013 Dec;56(12):2582-92. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3039-1. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
PMID: 24026211DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2010
First Posted
April 20, 2010
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 30, 2013
Results First Posted
July 30, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07