Pemigatinib After Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Multicenter, Phase 1, Open-Label Study of the FGFR Inhibitor Pemigatinib (INCB054828) Administered After Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With Adverse or Intermediate Risk Cytogenetics
2 other identifiers
interventional
32
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This phase I trial identifies the best dose and clinical benefit of giving pemigatinib following standard induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Pemigatinib selectively inhibits FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptor) activity, a receptor that may contribute to the growth of leukemia cells. The genetic changes responsible for activating the growth of leukemia cells can be unique to each patient and can change during the course of the disease. Chemotherapy drugs, such as cytarabine and daunorubicin work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
December 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
6 years
August 20, 2020
December 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs)
Will be summarized using the proportion and exact binomial confidence interval. DLTs will be summarized at each dose level by severity and major organ site according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5.0.
From cycle 1 day 8, until 14 days after cycle 1 day 28 (up to 42 days)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Rate of composite complete remission (cCR)
From cycle 1 day 1, until blood cell count recovery after induction (day 25-42)
Duration of remission (DOR)
Date of first response (>= immune complete remission) till date of documented relapse assessed up to 2 years from last dose of study intervention
Event-free survival (EFS)
From cycle 1 day 1, until date of primary refractory disease, progression, relapse, or death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years from last dose of study intervention
Relapse-free survival (RFS)
Date of first response (>= complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi]), until date of relapse or death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years from last dose of study intervention
Overall survival (OS)
From cycle 1 day 1, until date of death from any cause, assessed up to 2 years from last dose of study intervention
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Treatment (cytarabine, daunorubicin, pemigatinib)
EXPERIMENTALINDUCTION: Patients receive cytarabine IV on days 1-7, daunorubicin IV on days 1-3, and pemigatinib PO QD on days 8-21 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with hematologic count recovery (assessed between days 25-42) after induction proceed to consolidation therapy. Patients undergo ECHO during screening and as clinically indicated on study. Patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow aspirate and biopsy during screening and cycle 11 day 21 on study. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive high dose cytarabine IV BID on days 1, 3, and 5 of each cycle, and pemigatinib PO QD on days 8-21 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo ECHO as clinically indicated and blood sample collection and bone marrow biopsy and aspirate at the end of consolidation.
Interventions
Undergo blood sample collection
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and aspirate
Given PO
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and aspiratie
Given IV
Given IV
Undergo ECHO
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3); MLLT3-KMT2A
- Cytogenetic abnormalities not classified as favorable
- t(6;9)(p23;q34.1); DEK-NUP214
- t(v;11q23.3); KMT2A rearranged
- t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2); BCR-ABL1
- inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2,MECOM(EVI1)
- or del(5q); -7; -17/abn(17p)
- Complex karyotype - defined as three or more unrelated chromosome abnormalities in the absence of 1 of the WHO-designated recurring translocations or inversions, that is, t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16), t(9;11), t(v;11)(v;q23.3), t(6;9), inv(3) or t(3;3); AML with BCR-ABL1
- Monosomal karyotype - defined by the presence of 1 single monosomy (excluding loss of X or Y) in association with at least 1 additional monosomy or structural chromosome abnormality (excluding core-binding factor AML)
- Mutated RUNX1 (without favorable risk cytogenetics/mutations)
- Mutated BCOR (without favorable risk cytogenetics/mutations)
- Mutated EZH2 (without favorable risk cytogenetics/mutations)
- Mutated ASXL1 (without favorable risk cytogenetics/mutations)
- Mutated SF3B1 (without favorable risk cytogenetics/mutations)
- Mutated SRSF2 (without favorable risk cytogenetics/mutations)
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Except for commonly observed calcifications in soft tissues such as the skin, kidney tendon, or vessels due to injury, disease, or aging in the absence of systemic mineral imbalance)
- Individuals positive for hepatitis B core antibody who are receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are eligible if HepB PCR is negative
- For participants with an intraventricular conduction delay (QRS interval \> 120 ms), the JTc interval may be used in place of the QTc with approval from Sponsor-Investigator. The JTc must be =\< 340 ms if JTc is used in place of the QTc.
- Use of CYP3A4 inhibitors should be avoided but, if medically necessary, is permitted with a dose reduction of study drug
- Use of moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors are permitted.
- Based on the low overall bioavailability of topical ketoconazole, there are no restrictions on topical ketoconazole
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- OHSU Knight Cancer Institutelead
- Incyte Corporationcollaborator
- Oregon Health and Science Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
UT Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center-Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Related Publications (1)
Al-Bazaz M, Forstreuter A, Hammada I, Hille J, Wagner JN, Reinert J, Wehrhahn J, Bokemeyer C, Fiedler W. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Characterized by Rare BCR::FGFR1 Translocation: A Case Report With Literature Review. Case Rep Hematol. 2025 Oct 23;2025:8892036. doi: 10.1155/crh/8892036. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 41180818DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elie Traer, MD PhD
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2020
First Posted
December 9, 2020
Study Start
January 14, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12