COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF MCI and DEMENTIA TREATMENTS IN A COMMUNITY-BASED DEMENTIA PRACTICE
Retrospective Analysis of the Comparative Effectiveness of MCI and Dementia Treatment Protocols in a Community-based Specialty Dementia Practice
1 other identifier
observational
900
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This retrospective study is a more extensive, confirmatory analysis of the cognitive and functional outcomes initially seen in 2 groups of MCI/dementia patients in Springfield, MA and compares specialized dementia care and a comprehensive treatment approach versus usual care delivered in a non-specialist setting. The first group of patients (n= 328) was seen by a dementia specialist, who utilized a standardized assessment and treatment protocol (CNS). This included comprehensive identification and treatment of hypoxia, sleep-disorders, and other cognitively-impairing metabolic conditions as well as maximally- dosed FDA-approved medications for dementia, depression, and PBA. The second group of patients (n= 280) was seen by non-dementia specialists in the community and received usual care which did not include comprehensive assessment or treatment of underlying metabolic derangements or maximal utilization of currently available medications. This study, evaluating date from a larger cohort (n\>800) of specialist-treated cognitively-impaired patients, will further examine the hypothesis that a comprehensive dementia treatment protocol yields cognitive stabilization and/or improvement using already available dementia drugs when compared with usual community care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2016
CompletedAugust 9, 2016
August 1, 2016
6.9 years
July 29, 2016
August 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cognitive testing - Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST)
At each office visit, for 96 months, until patient left the practice, or until date of death
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Resting and ambulatory pulse oximetry in office
At each office visit, for 96 months, until patient left the practice, or until date of death
Nocturnal pulse oximetry
Ordered and Initial office visit or subsequent patient visits, for 96 months, until the patient left the practice, or until the date of death.
Polysomnography in-lab and ambulatory ( in patient's residence)
Initial study ordered at first or subsequent office visit for for 96 months, until the patient left the practice, or until the date of death.
Laboratory values: Chem 20, CBC/diff, BNP, CRP, iron, iron/TIBC, ferritin, homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, Vitamin D 25-OH, RPR/FTA-ABS/TPPA, IGF-1
Ordered at initial and subsequent office visits for 96 months, until patient left the practice, or until date of death
Other Outcomes (5)
Medications - prescribed
Ordered ar Initial office visit and any subsequent visits for Ordered at initial and subsequent office visits for 96 months, until patient left the practice, or until date of death
Oxygen - prescribed
Ordered at either at initial or subsequent office visit for a period of 96 months, or until patient left the practice, or until date of death
Diagnosis: Obstructive/Central/Complex Sleep Apnea CPAP- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or Bi-PAP
CPAP ordered at either at initial or subsequent office visit for a period of 96 months, or until patient left the practice, or until date of death
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
GROUP 1- CNS Protocol
Patients in a specialized dementia practice. Evaluated and treated for hypoxia, elevated BNP, hyperhomocysteinemia, B 12 deficiency as measured by elevated methymalonic acid, Vitamin D 25-OH deficiency, elevated CRP, and decreased IGF-1, and other metabolic abnormalities. Treated with maximal doses of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, methylfolate/methylB12/N-acetylcysteine, dextromethorphan/quinidine, and SSRI's; dose and duration based on protocol.
GROUP 2- Community Care
Patients referred to a neuropsychology practice for cognitive evaluation and treated for MCI or dementia by their primary care clinician or non-dementia specialist according to specific provider's usual practice pattern.
Eligibility Criteria
Cohort 1: Consecutive patients presenting for care for cognitive impairment in a non-academic, non-hospital based, dementia specialty practice in Springfield, MA Cohort 2: Convenience sample of patients referred to neuropsychological testing and treated by non-dementia specialists in Springfield, MA
You may qualify if:
- individuals presenting for assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment, either by self-identification, report by family or caregivers, or upon referral from another physician.
You may not qualify if:
- individuals who were not fluent in English and for whom a translator was not available.
- individuals who were blind
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Clionsky MI, Clionsky E. Development and validation of the Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST): A better screening test for dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010 Dec;25(8):650-6. doi: 10.1177/1533317510386216.
PMID: 21131671BACKGROUNDThe Memory Orientation Screening Test accurately separates Normal from MCI and Demented Elder in a prevalence-stratified sample. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinsonism. 2013 vol 3(1). http://dx.doi,org/10.4172/2161-04601000109
BACKGROUNDClionsky M, Clionsky E. Psychometric equivalence of a paper-based and computerized (iPad) version of the Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST(R)). Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(5):747-55. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.913686. Epub 2014 May 12.
PMID: 24815733BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emily F Clionsky, M.D.
Clionsky Neuro Systems Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2016
First Posted
August 9, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share