Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine, Fludarabine Phosphate, Cytarabine, and Filgrastim in Treating Younger Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 1/2 Study of CPX-351 (NSC# 775341) Alone Followed by Fludarabine, Cytarabine, and G-CSF (FLAG) for Children With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
5 other identifiers
interventional
38
2 countries
73
Brief Summary
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine when given with fludarabine phosphate, cytarabine, and filgrastim and to see how well they work in treating younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia that has come back after treatment (relapsed) or is not responding to treatment (is refractory). Liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine is made up of two chemotherapy drugs, cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride, and works to stop cancer cell growth by blocking the cells from dividing. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Filgrastim may increase the production of blood cells and may help the immune system recover from the side effects of chemotherapy. Giving liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine followed by fludarabine phosphate, cytarabine, and filgrastim may be a better treatment for patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and may cause fewer side effects to the heart, a common effect of other chemotherapy treatments for acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started May 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_1
73 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
August 1, 2023
2.7 years
December 2, 2015
December 10, 2019
August 29, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity
Number of patients in the dose-finding phase with a dose-limiting toxicity, graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
28 days
Percentage of Responders (Complete Response or Complete Remission With Partial Platelet Recovery) After up to 2 Cycles
Best response (complete response or complete remission with partial platelet recovery) after up to 2 cycles of therapy, where response is assessed using the revised Acute Myeloid Leukemia International Working Group Criteria. Percentage of responders is calculated using the methods of Jung and Kim. 90% confidence interval is determined using the methods of Koyama and Chen.
Up to 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Percentage of Responders (Complete Response or Complete Remission With Partial or Incomplete Platelet Recovery) After First Cycle of Therapy
Up to 4 weeks
Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin Clearance
Prior to infusion on day 5 and, 45 and 90 minutes post day 5 infusion of cycle 1
Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin Volume of Distribution
Prior to infusion on day 5 and, 45 and 90 minutes post day 5 infusion of cycle 1
Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin Time of Maximum Concentration
Prior to infusion on day 5 and, 45 and 90 minutes post day 5 infusion of cycle 1
Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin Area Under the Curve
Prior to infusion on day 5 and, 45 and 90 minutes post day 5 infusion of cycle 1
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Length of Hospitalization Time
Up to 1 year
Time to Bone Marrow Count Recovery
Up to 1 year
Time to Peripheral Blood Cell Count Recovery
Up to 1 year
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Treatment (CPX-351 and FLAG)
EXPERIMENTALCOURSE 1: Patients receive cytarabine IT on day 0 and at day 28-30 or up to 7 days prior to day 1 of course 2, and liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3, and 5. Patients with CNS1 receive no further CNS-directed therapy in course 1. Patients with CNS2 disease may receive additional 4-6 doses of cytarabine IT twice weekly starting 48 hours after the third dose of liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine until CNS is clear at the discretion of the investigator. Patients meeting criteria for CR, CRp, and CRi may proceed to course 2. COURSE 2: Patients receive filgrastim on days 1-5 and then on day 15 until blood count recovery, and fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes and high-dose cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours QD on days 1-5.
Interventions
Given IT or IV
Given SC or IV
Given IV
Given IV
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have had histologic verification of AML at original diagnosis
- Patient must have one of the following:
- Recurrent disease with \>= 5% blasts in the bone marrow (M2/M3 bone marrow), with or without extramedullary disease.
- Recurrent disease with an absolute blast count greater than 1,000 per microliter in the peripheral blood with or without extramedullary disease
- To be eligible for the dose-finding phase: (the dose-finding phase completed in 12/2016)
- Relapsed patients
- Patients must be in first relapse, and
- Patients must not have received prior re-induction therapy
- Refractory patients
- Patients must not have received more than one attempt at remission induction, which may consist of up to two different therapy courses; Children Oncology Group (COG) AAML1031 de novo therapy including induction I and induction II is an example
- Treatment-related AML (t-AML)
- Patients must be previously untreated for secondary AML
- To be eligible for the phase 2 efficacy phase:
- Relapse patients:
- Patients must be in first marrow relapse, and
- +38 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have received \> 450 mg/m\^2 daunorubicin equivalents; patients who relapse after receiving AAML0531/AAML1031 therapy will be eligible for this study, provided they have not received any additional anthracyclines; NOTE: for the purposes of determining eligibility for this protocol, the following cardiotoxicity multipliers will be used to determine daunorubicin equivalents:
- Doxorubicin (doxorubicin hydrochloride): 1
- Mitoxantrone: 3
- Idarubicin: 3
- Epirubicin: 0.5
- Patients who are currently receiving another investigational drug
- Patients receiving medications for treatment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- Patients with any of the following diagnoses:
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
- Down syndrome
- Fanconi anemia, Kostmann syndrome, Shwachman syndrome or any other known bone marrow failure syndrome
- Wilson's disease and any other disorder of copper metabolism
- Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML)
- Patients with documented active, uncontrolled infection at the time of study entry
- Patients with known active hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's Oncology Grouplead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (73)
Children's Hospital of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202-3591, United States
Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center
Downey, California, 90242, United States
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Valley Children's Hospital
Madera, California, 93636, United States
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
Oakland, California, 94609, United States
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92868, United States
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
UCSF Medical Center-Mission Bay
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children
Wilmington, Delaware, 19803, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
University of Florida Health Science Center - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Nemours Children's Clinic-Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
Nemours Children's Clinic - Pensacola
Pensacola, Florida, 32504, United States
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701, United States
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Egleston
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Lurie Children's Hospital-Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Riley Hospital for Children
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Ascension Saint Vincent Indianapolis Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Eastern Maine Medical Center
Bangor, Maine, 04401, United States
Maine Children's Cancer Program
Scarborough, Maine, 04074, United States
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
C S Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Ascension Saint John Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
University of Minnesota/Masonic Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Mercy Hospital Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Children's Hospital and Medical Center of Omaha
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
NYU Winthrop Hospital
Mineola, New York, 11501, United States
Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone
New York, New York, 10016, United States
NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States
Mission Hospital
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801, United States
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron
Akron, Ohio, 44308, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States
Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105, United States
The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
UT Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center-Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Children's Hospital of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78207, United States
Primary Children's Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113, United States
University of Vermont and State Agricultural College
Burlington, Vermont, 05405, United States
Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9, Canada
IWK Health Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3K 6R8, Canada
Kingston Health Sciences Centre
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
The Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
Montreal, Quebec, H3H 1P3, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec
Québec, G1V 4G2, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Cooper TM, Absalon MJ, Alonzo TA, Gerbing RB, Leger KJ, Hirsch BA, Pollard J, Razzouk BI, Aplenc R, Kolb EA. Phase I/II Study of CPX-351 Followed by Fludarabine, Cytarabine, and Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor for Children With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;38(19):2170-2177. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03306. Epub 2020 May 13.
PMID: 32401633DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Results Reporting Coordinator
- Organization
- Children's Oncology Group
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Todd M Cooper
Children's Oncology Group
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2015
First Posted
December 30, 2015
Study Start
May 2, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Results First Posted
December 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2023-08