NCT00764907

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. A donor stem cell transplant may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Giving combination chemotherapy before the transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells and stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying different risk-adjusted combination chemotherapy regimens in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 leukemia

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2002

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2007

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 1, 2008

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2009

Status Verified

July 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

October 1, 2008

Last Update Submit

July 7, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

T-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemiaB-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemiauntreated childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Disease-free survival

  • Event-free survival

  • Overall survival

Study Arms (3)

Arm I

EXPERIMENTAL

During reinduction, patients receive 1 course of protocol II.

Drug: asparaginaseDrug: cyclophosphamideDrug: cytarabineDrug: dexamethasoneDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: methotrexateDrug: thioguanineDrug: vincristine sulfate

Arm II

EXPERIMENTAL

During reinduction, patients receive 2-3 course of protocol III and interim maintenance therapy.

Drug: asparaginaseDrug: cyclophosphamideDrug: cytarabineDrug: dexamethasoneDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: mercaptopurineDrug: methotrexateDrug: thioguanineDrug: vincristine sulfate

Arm III

EXPERIMENTAL

During reinduction, patients are receive 2 courses of protocol II and interim maintenance therapy OR 3-block consolidation regimen and 1 course of protocol II.

Drug: asparaginaseDrug: cyclophosphamideDrug: cytarabineDrug: daunorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: dexamethasoneDrug: doxorubicin hydrochlorideDrug: etoposideDrug: ifosfamideDrug: leucovorin calciumDrug: mercaptopurineDrug: methotrexateDrug: prednisoneDrug: thioguanineDrug: vincristine sulfateDrug: vindesine

Interventions

Given IV during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm III

Given IV or orally during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm III

Given orally during reinduction

Arm IIArm III

Given orally during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given intrathecally during reinduction

Arm III

Given orally during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm IArm IIArm III

Given IV during reinduction

Arm III

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Cytologically proven acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) * No relapse of a previously unrecognized ALL * Patients must meet one of the following risk criteria: * Standard-risk (SR) group meeting all of the following criteria: * Blasts \< 1,000/μL in peripheral blood (PB) on day 8 * Aged 1 to \< 6 years * Initial WBC \< 20,000/μL * M1 (5%) or M2 (≥ 5% to \< 25%) blasts in bone marrow on day 15 * M1 marrow on day 33 * Intermediate-risk (IR) group meeting all of the following criteria: * Aged \< 1 or ≥ 6 years and/or WBC ≥ 20,000/μL * Blasts \< 1,000/μL in PB on day 8 * M1 or M2 marrow on day 15 * M3 (≥ 25%) marrow on day 15 OR meets SR criteria but M3 marrow on day 15 and M1 marrow on day 33 * High-risk (HR) group meeting ≥ 1 of the following criteria: * Meets IR criteria and M3 marrow on day 15 (not SR and M3 on day 15) * Blasts ≥ 1,000/μL in PB on day 8 * M2 or M3 marrow on day 33 * Translocation t(9;22) \[BCR/ABL+\] (Philadelphia chromosome-positive) or t(4;11) \[MLL/AF4+\] * No secondary ALL PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * No Down syndrome * No other major disease that prohibits study treatment (e.g., severe congenital heart disease) * Not requiring significant therapy modification owing to study therapy-associated complications * No complications due to other interventions * No one with missing data that are needed for the differential diagnosis, or for selection of the proper therapy arm PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * No steroids or cytostatic drugs within four weeks prior to start of study therapy

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Motol

Prague, 150 06, Czechia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Zuna J, Moericke A, Arens M, Koehler R, Panzer-Grumayer R, Bartram CR, Fischer S, Fronkova E, Zaliova M, Schrauder A, Stanulla M, Zimmermann M, Trka J, Stary J, Attarbaschi A, Mann G, Schrappe M, Cario G. Implications of delayed bone marrow aspirations at the end of treatment induction for risk stratification and outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2016 Jun;173(5):742-8. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13989. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

  • Stary J, Zimmermann M, Campbell M, Castillo L, Dibar E, Donska S, Gonzalez A, Izraeli S, Janic D, Jazbec J, Konja J, Kaiserova E, Kowalczyk J, Kovacs G, Li CK, Magyarosy E, Popa A, Stark B, Jabali Y, Trka J, Hrusak O, Riehm H, Masera G, Schrappe M. Intensive chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the randomized intercontinental trial ALL IC-BFM 2002. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 20;32(3):174-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.6522. Epub 2013 Dec 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Leukemia

Interventions

AsparaginaseCyclophosphamideCytarabineDaunorubicinDexamethasoneDoxorubicinEtoposideIfosfamideLeucovorinMercaptopurineMethotrexatePrednisoneThioguanineVincristineVindesine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AmidohydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesPhosphoramide MustardsNitrogen Mustard CompoundsMustard CompoundsHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsPhosphoramidesOrganophosphorus CompoundsCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsArabinonucleosidesNucleosidesNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and NucleosidesAnthracyclinesNaphthacenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicPolycyclic CompoundsAminoglycosidesGlycosidesCarbohydratesPregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsSteroids, FluorinatedPodophyllotoxinTetrahydronaphthalenesNaphthalenesGlucosidesOxazinesFormyltetrahydrofolatesTetrahydrofolatesFolic AcidPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingCoenzymesSulfhydryl CompoundsSulfur CompoundsPurinesAminopterinPregnadienediolsVinca AlkaloidsSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsIndole AlkaloidsAlkaloidsIndolesIndolizidinesIndolizines

Study Officials

  • Jan Stary, MD

    University Hospital, Motol

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2008

First Posted

October 2, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2002

Primary Completion

October 1, 2007

Last Updated

July 8, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-07

Locations