Food Swaps to Improve the Healthfulness and Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Grocery Purchases
A Randomized Trial of Food Swaps to Improve the Healthfulness and Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Grocery Purchases
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,201
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to determine whether viewing health or climate labels (or both) and receiving recommendations for healthier or more climate-friendly swaps (or both) in an online grocery store environment improves the healthfulness and reduces the carbon footprint of consumers' food and beverage purchases compared to shopping as usual without swap recommendations. The online store will record participants' food selections. Participants will also be asked to complete survey measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 25, 2025
CompletedJuly 22, 2025
July 1, 2025
2 months
October 16, 2024
July 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Healthfulness of product selection
The study will asses healthfulness of participants' selections as the average Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model score of the products the participants select in the shopping task. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores are healthier.
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
Carbon footprint of participants' grocery store selections
The study will assess the carbon footprint of participants' selections, operationalized as the average carbon footprint (in CO2-equivalents) of the products the participants select in the shopping task.
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Calorie density of participants' grocery selections
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
Sugar density of participants' grocery selections
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
Sodium density of participants' grocery selections
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
Saturated fat density of participants' grocery selections
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
Fiber density of participants' grocery selections
Assessed at baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 2-week follow-up
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (12)
Perceived helpfulness of nutrition labels
Assessed at 2-week follow-up
Perceived helpfulness of climate labels
Assessed at 2-week follow-up
Perceived helpfulness of health swap recommendations
Assessed at 2-week follow-up
- +9 more other outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Health swaps
EXPERIMENTALLabels will be "nutrition grades" for products and replacement swap suggestions will be for items with a better nutrition grade.
Climate swaps
EXPERIMENTALLabels will be "climate grades" for products and replacement swap suggestions will be for items with a better climate grade.
Combined health and climate swaps
EXPERIMENTALLabels will be "nutrition grades" and "climate grades" for products and replacement swap suggestions will be for items that are better than originally selected products on at least one dimension (nutrition grade or climate grade) and not worse than originally selected products on either dimension.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORNo labels or swaps.
Interventions
Participants will view "health grade" labels on all products in the online grocery store indicating their healthfulness as estimated by United Kingdom Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model scores. The health score labels will mimic Nutri-Score labels, a labeling system used in some European countries, showing a color-coded grade of "A" (green) through "F" (red) on each product. Products with "A" and "B" labels will meet the United Kingdom's cutoff for products that can be marketed to children and "C", "D" and "F" labels products are less healthy than this cutoff (based on tertiles of Ofcom scores within each food group). When participants attempt to add a less healthy product to their cart (e.g., "C," "D" or "F" health label), the store will automatically suggest a healthier product from the same category (e.g., with a "A" or "B" health label).
Participants will view "climate grade" labels on all products indicating their climate impact. The climate impact is calculated as the greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing the product in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) per 100g (i.e., "carbon footprint"). Labels will be applied based on quintiles of carbon footprints in each food group. When participants attempt to add a high-climate-impact product to their cart (e.g., with a "C," "D," or "F" climate label), the store will automatically offer them swaps to more climate-friendly products (e.g., with a "A" or "B" climate label).
Participants will view both the health and climate grade labels on all products in the online grocery store. When participants attempt to select a product with a "C," "D," or "F" label on either dimension to their cart, the store will automatically offer them swaps to products that offer improvement over the original food on at least 1 dimension (health or climate-friendliness) and were at least as good or better on the other dimension, with the additional guardrail that the store never suggests products with a "C," "D" or "F" label on either dimension.
Participants will not view any extra labels or be offered any swaps in the online grocery store.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Reside in the United States
- Able to complete a survey in English
- Have internet access to complete the 3 online study visits
You may not qualify if:
- Under the age of 18
- Reside outside of the United States
- Unable to complete a survey in English
- Do not have internet access to complete the 3 online study visits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford School of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna H. Grummon, PhD
Stanford School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2024
First Posted
October 18, 2024
Study Start
May 7, 2025
Primary Completion
June 25, 2025
Study Completion
June 25, 2025
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The analytic code will be posted to a public repository upon publication of study findings.
- Access Criteria
- Publicly available without restrictions.
The investigators will post the data to a public repository.