Umbrella Review of the DASH Dietary Pattern and Cardiometabolic Risk
DASH Dietary Pattern and Cardiometabolic Risk: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies and Randomized and Non-randomized Controlled Trials
1 other identifier
observational
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines have not made any specific recommendations regarding the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, a dietary pattern that emphasizes fruits and vegetables, low-fat or non-fat dairy, limiting saturated fat intake and usually also recommends limiting sodium intake. To update the recommendations, the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the EASD commissioned an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to summarize the available evidence from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies and randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of the relationship between the DASH dietary pattern and cardiometabolic risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedDecember 7, 2018
December 1, 2018
1.4 years
May 9, 2018
December 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incident CVD (Prospective Cohort Studies)
Relative Risk
At least 1 year
Blood Pressure - Systolic Blood Pressure (randomized and non-randomized controlled trials)
Mean Difference
Up to 20 years
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Incident CHD (Prospective Cohort Studies)
At least 1 year
Incident Stroke (Prospective Cohort Studies)
At least 1 year
Incident Diabetes (Prospective Cohort Studies)
At least 1 year
Blood Pressure - Diastolic Blood Pressure (randomized and non-randomized controlled trials)
Up to 20 years
Blood Lipids - Total-Cholesterol (randomized and non-randomized controlled trials)
Up to 20 years
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
A dietary pattern that emphasizes intake of fruits and vegetables, low-fat or non-fat dairy, limiting saturated fat intake, and usually also recommends limiting sodium intake.
Eligibility Criteria
All individuals, both children and adults, regardless of health status.
You may qualify if:
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prospective cohorts or controlled clinical trials
- Assessment of the DASH dietary pattern
- Viable outcome data with ≥ 1 outcome of interest
You may not qualify if:
- Non-systematic review and meta-analysis publications
- Non-human studies
- No assessment of the exposure of the DASH dietary pattern
- No viable outcome data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Toronto 3D (Diet, Digestive tract and Disease) Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2T2, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER 3rd, Simons-Morton DG, Karanja N, Lin PH; DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jan 4;344(1):3-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440101.
PMID: 11136953BACKGROUNDPiepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, Cooney MT, Corra U, Cosyns B, Deaton C, Graham I, Hall MS, Hobbs FDR, Lochen ML, Lollgen H, Marques-Vidal P, Perk J, Prescott E, Redon J, Richter DJ, Sattar N, Smulders Y, Tiberi M, van der Worp HB, van Dis I, Verschuren WMM. [2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts. Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation]. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2017 Jul-Aug;18(7):547-612. doi: 10.1714/2729.27821. No abstract available. Italian.
PMID: 28714997BACKGROUNDAnderson TJ, Gregoire J, Pearson GJ, Barry AR, Couture P, Dawes M, Francis GA, Genest J Jr, Grover S, Gupta M, Hegele RA, Lau DC, Leiter LA, Lonn E, Mancini GB, McPherson R, Ngui D, Poirier P, Sievenpiper JL, Stone JA, Thanassoulis G, Ward R. 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Adult. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Nov;32(11):1263-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.510. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
PMID: 27712954BACKGROUNDChobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT Jr, Roccella EJ; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2560-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. Epub 2003 May 14.
PMID: 12748199BACKGROUNDHiggins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
PMID: 22008217BACKGROUNDWells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2014. Available: www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
BACKGROUNDBalshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
PMID: 21208779BACKGROUNDDiabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee; Sievenpiper JL, Chan CB, Dworatzek PD, Freeze C, Williams SL. Nutrition Therapy. Can J Diabetes. 2018 Apr;42 Suppl 1:S64-S79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.009. No abstract available.
PMID: 29650114BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John L Sievenpiper, MD, PhD
University of Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2018
First Posted
May 31, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 31, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
December 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This is not applicable since there is no individual participant data.