GM-CSF With or Without Vaccine Therapy After Combination Chemotherapy and Rituximab as First-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of FavID® (Id/KLH) and GM-CSF Following CHOP/Rituximab as First-Line Therapy in Subjects With High-Intermediate and High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
3 other identifiers
interventional
480
1 country
2
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Colony-stimulating factors, such as GM-CSF, may increase the number of immune cells found in bone marrow or peripheral blood and may help the immune system recover from the side effects of chemotherapy. Vaccines made from a person's cancer cells may help the body build an effective immune response to kill cancer cells. It is not yet known whether giving GM-CSF together with vaccine therapy is more effective than giving GM-CSF together with a placebo when given after combination chemotherapy and rituximab in treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying GM-CSF and vaccine therapy to see how well they work compared to GM-CSF and placebo when given after combination chemotherapy and rituximab as first-line therapy in treating patients with stage II, stage III, or stage IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 lymphoma
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2006
CompletedDecember 18, 2013
March 1, 2007
May 10, 2006
December 17, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Disease-free survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method at 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Disease-free survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method at 2 years
Duration of response (complete or partial response)
Overall disease-free survival
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Favrillelead
Study Sites (2)
Tower Cancer Research Foundation
Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7295, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
John F. Bender, PharmD
Favrille
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2006
First Posted
May 11, 2006
Last Updated
December 18, 2013
Record last verified: 2007-03