SWOG-9321 Melphalan, TBI, and Transplant vs Combo Chemo in Untreated Myeloma
Standard Dose Versus Myeloablative Therapy for Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma, A Phase III Intergroup Study
5 other identifiers
interventional
899
1 country
34
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage cancer cells. Combining chemotherapy and radiation therapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy and radiation therapy and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for multiple myeloma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of melphalan, total-body irradiation, and peripheral stem cell transplantation with that of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have previously untreated multiple myeloma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
Started Jan 1994
Longer than P75 for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
34 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1994
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 6, 2015
March 1, 2015
9.8 years
November 1, 1999
March 5, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
survival
3 years from randomization
Study Arms (4)
HDCTX and PBSC
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells IND (q 5 weeks): vincristine 0.5 mg/d cont IV D1-4; adriamycin 10mg/m2/d cont IV D1-4; dex 40 mg/d PO or IVPB D1-4, 9-12, 17-20 2nd Reg: cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 IV over 1 hr every 3 hrs x 3 (4.5g/m2 total); MESNA 4.5 g/m2 24 hr IV start with cyclo; GCSF 0.25 mg/m2/d SQ; PBSC collection Chemo: vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 IV D1, BCNU 20 mg/m2 IV D1, melphalan 8 mg/m2 PO D1-4, cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 IV D1, prednisone 40 mg/m2 PO D1-7
HDCTX with PBSC and Autologous BMT
EXPERIMENTALHigh dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells and autologous bone marrow transplant High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells and autologous bone marrow transplant High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells IND (q 5 weeks): vincristine 0.5 mg/d cont IV D1-4; adriamycin 10mg/m2/d cont IV D1-4; dex 40 mg/d PO or IVPB D1-4, 9-12, 17-20 2nd Reg: cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 IV over 1 hr every 3 hrs x 3 (4.5g/m2 total); MESNA 4.5 g/m2 24 hr IV start with cyclo; GCSF 0.25 mg/m2/d SQ; PBSC collection Auto Trans: Mel 140mg/m2 IV D-5; TBI 150cGy D-4, -3, -2, -1; infusion D0
HDCTX with PBSC and interferon
EXPERIMENTALHigh dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells and interferon Experimental: HDCTX with PBSC and interferon High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells and interferon High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells IND (q 5 weeks): vincristine 0.5 mg/d cont IV D1-4; adriamycin 10mg/m2/d cont IV D1-4; dex 40 mg/d PO or IVPB D1-4, 9-12, 17-20 2nd Reg: cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 IV over 1 hr every 3 hrs x 3 (4.5g/m2 total); MESNA 4.5 g/m2 24 hr IV start with cyclo; GCSF 0.25 mg/m2/d SQ; PBSC collection Chemo: vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 IV D1, BCNU 20 mg/m2 IV D1, melphalan 8 mg/m2 PO D1-4, cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 IV D1, prednisone 40 mg/m2 PO D1-7 IFN: IFN 3 million units/m2 MWF SQ
HDCTX with PBSC and transplant plus IFN
EXPERIMENTALHigh dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells and autologous bone marrow transplant plus alpha interferon Experimental: HDCTX with PBSC and transplant plus IFN High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells and autologous bone marrow transplant plus alpha interferon High dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells IND (q 5 weeks): vincristine 0.5 mg/d cont IV D1-4; adriamycin 10mg/m2/d cont IV D1-4; dex 40 mg/d PO or IVPB D1-4, 9-12, 17-20 2nd Reg: cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 IV over 1 hr every 3 hrs x 3 (4.5g/m2 total); MESNA 4.5 g/m2 24 hr IV start with cyclo; GCSF 0.25 mg/m2/d SQ; PBSC collection Trans: Mel 140mg/m2 IV D-5; TBI 150cGy D-4, -3, -2, -1; infusion D0 IFN: 3 million units/m2 MWF SQ
Interventions
3 million units/m2 SQ Monday-Wednesday -Friday (3 times a week)
20 mg/m2 I.V. day 1 q 35 days
1.5 g/m2 in 100 ml of D5W, IV intravenously over 1 hour every 3 hour x 3 (total dose 4.5 g/m2)
40 mg/day PO or IVPB days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20 q 5 weeks
10 mg/m2/day continuous 1 - 4 q 5 weeks
140 mg/m2 is given IV within 30 minutes of constitution on Day -5
40 mg/m2 PO days 1-7 q 35 days
0.5 mg/day continuous 1 - 4 q 5 weeks
day 0
day 0
administered in fractionated doses of 150 cGy, 6 - 10 hours apart bid, on Days -4, -3, -2, and -1 (Total 1,200 cGy)
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SWOG Cancer Research Networklead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Cancer and Leukemia Group Bcollaborator
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Groupcollaborator
Study Sites (34)
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404, United States
CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Inc.
Denver, Colorado, 80209-5031, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612-9497, United States
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-3013, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lakeside Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
CCOP - Evanston
Evanston, Illinois, 60201, United States
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-1016, United States
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410, United States
New England Medical Center Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106, United States
CCOP - Kalamazoo
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731, United States
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805, United States
University of Minnesota Cancer Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
CCOP - Metro-Minnesota
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - New York
New York, New York, 10010, United States
NYU School of Medicine's Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10016, United States
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Albert Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065, United States
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456, United States
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001, United States
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102-1192, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111, United States
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3489, United States
CCOP - Marshfield Medical Research and Education Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Milwaukee (Zablocki)
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295, United States
Related Publications (14)
van Ness BG, Ramos C, Kumar V, et al.: Analytical approaches for the BOAC SNP panel association with progression free survival in myeloma. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-2715, 2008.
BACKGROUNDCrowley JJ, McCoy J, LeBlanc M, et al.: Extreme regression: a statistical technique for finding good or poor prognostic groups, illustrated using myeloma patient data from Intergroup trial S9321. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-5202, 2004.
BACKGROUNDGreipp PR, Kumar S, Blood EA, et al.: A simple classification to identify poor-risk untreated myeloma. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 Pt 1): A-2351, 598a, 2002.
BACKGROUNDTian E, Bumm K, Xiao Y, et al.: A protocol for triple color interphase FISH on archived bone marrow biopsies from myeloma prepared with precipitating fixatives. [Abstract] Blood 96 (11 pt 1): A-665, 155a, 2000.
BACKGROUNDRajkumar V, Leong T, Fonseca R, et al.: Bone marrow angiogenesis has prognostic value in multiple myeloma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A68, 19a, 1999.
BACKGROUNDRimsza LM, Campbell K, Dalton WS, Salmon S, Willcox G, Grogan TM. The major vault protein (MVP), a new multidrug resistance associated protein, is frequently expressed in multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999 Jul;34(3-4):315-24. doi: 10.3109/10428199909050956.
PMID: 10439368BACKGROUNDBarlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD, McCoy J, Moore DF Jr, Dakhil SR, Lanier KS, Chapman RA, Cromer JN, Salmon SE, Durie B, Crowley JC. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):929-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5807. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
PMID: 16432076RESULTVan Ness BG, Crowley JC, Ramos C, et al.: SNP genotypes show association with common toxicities during both VAD induction and high dose melphalan with autologous transplant support in intergroup trial S9321 for myeloma: from the Bank on a Cure. [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-3488, 2005.
RESULTCrowley J, Fonseca R, Greipp P, et al.: Comparable survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) after VAD induction with high dose therapy using melphalan 140mg/m2 + TBI 12 Gy (MEL+TBI) versus standard therapy with VBMCP and no benefit from interferon (IFN) maintenance: final clinical results of intergroup trial S9321 in the context of IFM 90 and MRC VII trials. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-539, 2004.
RESULTSantana-Davila R, Crowley J, Durie B, et al.: Genetic polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome in the intergroup trial S9321, comparing high dose therapy with standard dose therapy for myelomaon, on behalf of ECOG, SWOG, CALGB, and the Bank on a Cure. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-1495, 2004.
RESULTLee CK, McCoy J, Anderson KC, et al.: Long-term follow-up of previously untreated symptomatic myeloma patients treated with myeloablative therapy and sibling-matched allogeneic transplantation of the SWOG study 9321. [Abstract] Blood 100 (11 pt 1): A-1644, 2002.
RESULTGreipp PR, Jacobson JL, Crowley JJ, et al.: BETA 2 microglobulin (beta 2M) and plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) constitute a strong prognostic index in the SWOG intergroup transplant trial S9321: observations on gender and age. [Abstract] Blood 96 (11 pt 1): A-653, 152a, 2000.
RESULTDesika R, Salmon S, Anderson K, et al.: Planned melphalan-total body irradiation (MEL-TBI) - based allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM) up to age 55: an intergroup experience (CALGB, ECOG and SWOG) under the auspices of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9321). [Abstract] Blood 94 (10 Pt 1): A-1546, 346a, 1999.
RESULTUsmani SZ, Heuck C, Mitchell A, Szymonifka J, Nair B, Hoering A, Alsayed Y, Waheed S, Haider S, Restrepo A, Van Rhee F, Crowley J, Barlogie B. Extramedullary disease portends poor prognosis in multiple myeloma and is over-represented in high-risk disease even in the era of novel agents. Haematologica. 2012 Nov;97(11):1761-7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.065698. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
PMID: 22689675DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Bart Barlogie, MD
University of Arkansas
- STUDY CHAIR
Kenneth C. Anderson, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- STUDY CHAIR
Robert A. Kyle, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
August 11, 2003
Study Start
January 1, 1994
Primary Completion
October 1, 2003
Study Completion
November 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 6, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03