Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for 4/M Neuroblastoma
Clinical Research of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Children With Stage 4/M Neuroblastoma: A Prospective, Single-arm, Phase II, Multi-center Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor of embryonal origin in children. According to the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging criteria and the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) ,NB preoperative staging is divided into L1, L2, M and Ms stages, the postoperative staging is divided into 1 to 4 stages and 4s stage. Among them, 4/M stage is of the highest degree of malignancy and the worst prognosis. Despite the aggressive combination therapy, the 5-year survival rate (OS) is still less than 15%, and the 2-year relapse rate is 80%. Currently, no effective treatment is accessible for refractory/relapsed stage 4/M NB after completing conventional therapy. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) , conditioning regimen with high-dose radiotherapy and chemotherapy is implemented to eradicate tumor cells and abnormal clonal cells in the patient, block the pathogenesis, and restore the patient's hematopoietic and immune systems by transplanting normal hematopoietic stem cells. According to the source of hematopoietic stem cells, HSCT can be divided into two types: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It has been confirmed that benefiting from the graft versus tumor(GVT) effect, allo-HSCT can clear residual lesions in refractory/relapsed NB patients post-auto-HSCT,and prolong the survival time of patients. Our center has explored the conditioning regimen, treatment of residual tumor lesions before transplantation, and strategies to reduce transplantation-related death (TRM) and enhance the GVT effect. However, the sample size is small, and multicenter and larger sample size research are needed. This study will further observe the clinical efficacy and safety of allo-HSCT in the treatment of 4/M stage NB, and provide a new treatment method and option for 4/M stage NB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2022
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2027
July 1, 2022
March 1, 2022
5 years
March 16, 2022
June 29, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
overall survival(OS) at 3 year
From the date of day 0 of transplantation until the date of death from any cause
3 years post-HSCT
event free survival(EFS) at 3 year
Survival time from day 0 of transplantation to the occurrence of the first adverse event. Disease or treatment-related adverse events, such as tumor recurrence, implant failure, and death, are counted in this study; accidental deaths that assessed unrelated to the above factors are not included
3 years post-HSCT
Secondary Outcomes (8)
incidence of conditioning toxicity
100 days post-HSCT
incidence of donor engraftment
100 days post-HSCT
early transplant-related mortality
100 days post-HSCT
incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
3 years post-HSCT
incidence of transplant associated thrombotic microangiopathy(TA-TMA)
3 years post-HSCT
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Conditioning regimen for different sources of donors
EXPERIMENTALThere are 3 groups according to different sources of donor: (1) Cord blood HSCT: Flu+Bu+CTX+Topotecan (without ATG); (2) Peripheral blood HSCT or haploid bone marrow combined with peripheral stem cell transplantation: Flu+Bu+Melphalan+Antithymocyte globulin (ATG)+ Thiotepa (TT) or (3) Flu+Bu+Melphalan+ATG (applicable to peripheral stem cells or haploid bone marrow combined with peripheral stem cell transplantation for which TT cannot be used).
Interventions
2.5 mg/kg/day;2 doses on day -3 and day -2 for matched sibling donor transplantation;3 doses on day -4,-3 and day -2 for unrelated donor transplantation;4 doses on day -5,-4,-3 and day -2 for haploidentical donor transplantation
30 mg/m2/day for 5 days
60 mg/kg/day for 2 days in cord blood stem cell transplantation
2mg/m2/day for 3 days in cord blood stem cell transplantation
70mg/m2/day,for peripheral stem cell transplantation or haploidentical bone marrow combined with peripheral stem cell transplantation;2 doses on day -3 and day -2 when conditioning regimen containing thiotepa;3 doses on day -4,-3 and day -2 when conditioning regimen not containing thiotepa;
5 mg/kg/day for 2 days in peripheral stem cell transplantation or haploidentical bone marrow combined with peripheral stem cell transplantation
0.8mg/kg/dose;8 doses in cord blood stem cell transplantation;12 doses in peripheral stem cell transplantation or haploidentical bone marrow combined with peripheral stem cell transplantation when conditioning regimen containing thiotepa;16 doses in peripheral stem cell transplantation or haploidentical bone marrow combined with peripheral stem cell transplantation when conditioning regimen not containing thiotepa;
2.5\~4 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours orally;1.5\~2 mg /kg/dose every 12 hours intravenously; trough concentration maintained at 150\~250ng/ml
0.02\~0.03 mg/kg/day as continuous infusion or 12 hour divided doses
15 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours
15 mg/m2/dose on d+1 and 10 mg/m2/dose on d+3,d+6 in peripheral stem cell transplantation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age≤18 years old;
- After at least 7 courses of induction chemotherapy (surgical resection of the primary tumor or metastatic disease has been completed during the period), evaluation of disease is CR, tumor markers (blood NSE and urine VMA) and minimal residual disease by flow cytometry of bone marrow and peripheral blood are negative; the primary tumor has completed radiotherapy before HSCT;
- For patients with PR or VGPR, tumor markers (blood NSE and urine VMA) and minimal residual disease by flow cytometry of bone marrow and peripheral blood are negative; the primary tumor and metastatic lesions have completed radiotherapy before HSCT;
- Relapsed patients achieve CR/VGPR/PR after re-induction or salvage chemotherapy, tumor markers (blood NSE and urine VMA) and minimal residual disease by flow cytometry of bone marrow and peripheral blood are negative; the primary tumor and metastatic lesions have completed radiotherapy before HSCT;
- Whole brain and whole spinal cord radiotherapy have completed before HSCT in patients with central invasion at onset;
- The blood routine has generally returned to normal and there is no dysfunction of major organs such as the heart, liver, lung, and kidney;
- The guardian/patient accept the treatment of this research, sign the informed consent, and complete the follow-up.
You may not qualify if:
- With severe cardiac insufficiency, cardiac ejection fraction (EF) is less than 50%; or severe cardiac disease, the patient can not tolerate the conditioning regimen according to the investigators' evaluation;
- With severe pulmonary insufficiency (severe obstructive and/or restrictive ventilation disorders), the patient can not tolerate the conditioning regimen according to the investigators' evaluation;
- With severe liver function impairment, ALT\>5 times upper limit of normal, or total bilirubin\>3 times upper limit of normal; the patient can not tolerate the conditioning regimen according to the investigators' evaluation;
- With severe renal insufficiency, creatinine\>2 times upper limit of normal; or corrected creatinine clearance rate Ccr\<50ml/min; the patient can not tolerate the conditioning regimen according to the investigators' evaluation;
- With severe active bleeding or severe active infection; the patient can not tolerate the conditioning regimen according to the investigators' evaluation;
- Allergic reactions or serious adverse reactions occurred in the previous use of conditioning regimen-related drugs, the patient can not tolerate the conditioning regimen according to the investigators' evaluation;
- The guardian/patient cannot understand or comply with the treatment plan;
- Other reasons for not being selected due to the investigator's evaluation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, China
Related Publications (28)
Pastor ER, Mousa SA. Current management of neuroblastoma and future direction. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Jun;138:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
PMID: 31092383BACKGROUNDBasta NO, Halliday GC, Makin G, Birch J, Feltbower R, Bown N, Elliott M, Moreno L, Barone G, Pearson AD, James PW, Tweddle DA, McNally RJ. Factors associated with recurrence and survival length following relapse in patients with neuroblastoma. Br J Cancer. 2016 Oct 25;115(9):1048-1057. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.302. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
PMID: 27701387BACKGROUNDMonclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, Brisse HJ, Cecchetto G, Holmes K, Kaneko M, London WB, Matthay KK, Nuchtern JG, von Schweinitz D, Simon T, Cohn SL, Pearson AD; INRG Task Force. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):298-303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6876. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
PMID: 19047290BACKGROUNDBrodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen NL, Castel V, Castelberry RP, De Bernardi B, Evans AE, Favrot M, Hedborg F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Aug;11(8):1466-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.8.1466.
PMID: 8336186BACKGROUNDSmith V, Foster J. High-Risk Neuroblastoma Treatment Review. Children (Basel). 2018 Aug 28;5(9):114. doi: 10.3390/children5090114.
PMID: 30154341BACKGROUNDLondon WB, Bagatell R, Weigel BJ, Fox E, Guo D, Van Ryn C, Naranjo A, Park JR. Historical time to disease progression and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma treated in the modern era on Children's Oncology Group early-phase trials. Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123(24):4914-4923. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30934. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
PMID: 28885700BACKGROUNDMatthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, Shimada H, Adkins ES, Haas-Kogan D, Gerbing RB, London WB, Villablanca JG. Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 1;27(7):1007-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8925. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
PMID: 19171716BACKGROUNDLadenstein R, Potschger U, Pearson ADJ, Brock P, Luksch R, Castel V, Yaniv I, Papadakis V, Laureys G, Malis J, Balwierz W, Ruud E, Kogner P, Schroeder H, de Lacerda AF, Beck-Popovic M, Bician P, Garami M, Trahair T, Canete A, Ambros PF, Holmes K, Gaze M, Schreier G, Garaventa A, Vassal G, Michon J, Valteau-Couanet D; SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group (SIOPEN). Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):500-514. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30070-0. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
PMID: 28259608BACKGROUNDDu H, Chen J, Qin M, Fang J, Li Z, Zhu Y, Sun X, Huang D, Yu J, Tang Y, Hu S, Li J, Zhang Z, Luan Z. Pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: Data and trends during 1998-2012. Pediatr Transplant. 2015 Aug;19(5):563-70. doi: 10.1111/petr.12525. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
PMID: 26058853BACKGROUNDUemura S, Ishida T, Thwin KKM, Yamamoto N, Tamura A, Kishimoto K, Hasegawa D, Kosaka Y, Nino N, Lin KS, Takafuji S, Mori T, Iijima K, Nishimura N. Dynamics of Minimal Residual Disease in Neuroblastoma Patients. Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 4;9:455. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00455. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31214500BACKGROUNDHirayama M, Azuma E, Araki M, Komada Y, Nakagawa A. Evidence of graft-versus-tumor effect in refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. Transplantation. 2006 Jul 15;82(1):142-4. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000225780.90991.49. No abstract available.
PMID: 16861958BACKGROUNDMarabelle A, Paillard C, Tchirkov A, Halle P, Chassagne J, Demeocq F, Kanold J. Graft-versus-tumour effect in refractory metastatic neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Jun;39(12):809-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705681. Epub 2007 Apr 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 17450181BACKGROUNDMatthay KK, Seeger RC, Reynolds CP, Stram DO, O'Leary MC, Harris RE, Selch M, Atkinson JB, Haase GM, Ramsay NK. Allogeneic versus autologous purged bone marrow transplantation for neuroblastoma: a report from the Childrens Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Nov;12(11):2382-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.11.2382.
PMID: 7964954BACKGROUNDLadenstein R, Lasset C, Hartmann O, Klingebiel T, Bouffet E, Gadner H, Paolucci P, Burdach S, Chauvin F, Pinkerton R, et al. Comparison of auto versus allografting as consolidation of primary treatments in advanced neuroblastoma over one year of age at diagnosis: report from the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1994 Jul;14(1):37-46.
PMID: 7951119BACKGROUNDYi ES, Son MH, Hyun JK, Cho HW, Ju HY, Lee JW, Yoo KH, Sung KW, Koo HH. Predictors of survival in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who failed tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Feb;67(2):e28066. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28066. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
PMID: 31736249BACKGROUNDHaghiri S, Fayech C, Mansouri I, Dufour C, Pasqualini C, Bolle S, Rivollet S, Dumas A, Boumaraf A, Belhout A, Journy N, Souchard V, Vu-Bezin G, Veres C, Haddy N, De Vathaire F, Valteau-Couanet D, Fresneau B. Long-term follow-up of high-risk neuroblastoma survivors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation rescue. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Aug;56(8):1984-1997. doi: 10.1038/s41409-021-01258-1. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
PMID: 33824435BACKGROUNDPark JR, Kreissman SG, London WB, Naranjo A, Cohn SL, Hogarty MD, Tenney SC, Haas-Kogan D, Shaw PJ, Kraveka JM, Roberts SS, Geiger JD, Doski JJ, Voss SD, Maris JM, Grupp SA, Diller L. Effect of Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplant vs Single Transplant on Event-Free Survival in Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Aug 27;322(8):746-755. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11642.
PMID: 31454045BACKGROUNDMilano F, Gooley T, Wood B, Woolfrey A, Flowers ME, Doney K, Witherspoon R, Mielcarek M, Deeg JH, Sorror M, Dahlberg A, Sandmaier BM, Salit R, Petersdorf E, Appelbaum FR, Delaney C. Cord-Blood Transplantation in Patients with Minimal Residual Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):944-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602074.
PMID: 27602666BACKGROUNDChen YH, Xu LP, Liu DH, Chen H, Zhang XH, Han W, Wang FR, Wang JZ, Wang Y, Huang XJ, Liu KY. Comparative outcomes between cord blood transplantation and bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors in patients with hematologic malignancies: a single-institute analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jul;126(13):2499-503.
PMID: 23823825BACKGROUNDEapen M, Rubinstein P, Zhang MJ, Stevens C, Kurtzberg J, Scaradavou A, Loberiza FR, Champlin RE, Klein JP, Horowitz MM, Wagner JE. Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Lancet. 2007 Jun 9;369(9577):1947-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60915-5.
PMID: 17560447BACKGROUNDRowinsky EK, Grochow LB, Hendricks CB, Ettinger DS, Forastiere AA, Hurowitz LA, McGuire WP, Sartorius SE, Lubejko BG, Kaufmann SH, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Apr;10(4):647-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.4.647.
PMID: 1312588BACKGROUNDCohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, Monclair T, Ambros PF, Brodeur GM, Faldum A, Hero B, Iehara T, Machin D, Mosseri V, Simon T, Garaventa A, Castel V, Matthay KK; INRG Task Force. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):289-97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
PMID: 19047291BACKGROUNDSottile F, Gnemmi I, Cantilena S, D'Acunto WC, Sala A. A chemical screen identifies the chemotherapeutic drug topotecan as a specific inhibitor of the B-MYB/MYCN axis in neuroblastoma. Oncotarget. 2012 May;3(5):535-45. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.498.
PMID: 22619121BACKGROUNDRujkijyanont P, Photia A, Traivaree C, Monsereenusorn C, Anurathapan U, Seksarn P, Sosothikul D, Techavichit P, Sanpakit K, Phuakpet K, Wiangnon S, Chotsampancharoen T, Chainansamit SO, Kanjanapongkul S, Meekaewkunchorn A, Hongeng S. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors to predict treatment response in high risk neuroblastoma patients receiving topotecan and cyclophosphamide containing induction regimen: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6186-z.
PMID: 31619207BACKGROUNDLondon WB, Frantz CN, Campbell LA, Seeger RC, Brumback BA, Cohn SL, Matthay KK, Castleberry RP, Diller L. Phase II randomized comparison of topotecan plus cyclophosphamide versus topotecan alone in children with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 20;28(24):3808-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5016. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
PMID: 20660830BACKGROUNDKasow KA, Stewart CF, Barfield RC, Wright NL, Li C, Srivastava DK, Leung W, Horwitz EM, Bowman LC, Handgretinger R, Hale GA. A phase I/II study of CY and topotecan in patients with high-risk malignancies undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: the St Jude long-term follow-up. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Nov;47(11):1448-54. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.51. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
PMID: 22426752BACKGROUNDPhilip T, Ladenstein R, Lasset C, Hartmann O, Zucker JM, Pinkerton R, Pearson AD, Klingebiel T, Garaventa A, Kremens B, Bernard JL, Rosti G, Chauvin F. 1070 myeloablative megatherapy procedures followed by stem cell rescue for neuroblastoma: 17 years of European experience and conclusions. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry Solid Tumour Working Party. Eur J Cancer. 1997 Oct;33(12):2130-5. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00324-9.
PMID: 9516868BACKGROUNDKreissman SG, Seeger RC, Matthay KK, London WB, Sposto R, Grupp SA, Haas-Kogan DA, Laquaglia MP, Yu AL, Diller L, Buxton A, Park JR, Cohn SL, Maris JM, Reynolds CP, Villablanca JG. Purged versus non-purged peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma (COG A3973): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):999-1008. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70309-7. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PMID: 23890779BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Yang Li
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jianpei Fang
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2022
First Posted
March 31, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share