Study Stopped
Sponsor decision
A Multiple Dose Study of Repeat Intravitreal Injections of GEM103 in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
A Multicenter, Multiple-Dose Study in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, Immunogenicity, and Clinical Effect of Repeat Intravitreal (IVT) Injections of GEM103 as an Adjunct to Standard of Care Aflibercept Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
23
Brief Summary
This study is designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of GEM103 IVT injection + standard of care vs. sham + standard of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Dec 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 18, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 31, 2022
CompletedOctober 31, 2022
March 1, 2022
1 year
December 21, 2020
October 4, 2022
October 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing condition in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product during the study, whether related or not to the study medication. TEAEs were defined as AE that occurred on or after the date and time of study drug administration or those that first occurred pre-dose but worsened by increase in occurrence or severity after study drug administration. Number of participants with ocular TEAEs in study eye and fellow eye were reported.
Baseline up to Week 48
Number of Participants With Non-ocular TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing condition in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product during the study, whether related or not to the study medication. TEAEs were defined as AE that occurred on or after the date and time of study drug administration or those that first occurred pre-dose but worsened by increase in occurrence or severity after study drug administration. Number of participants with non-ocular TEAEs were reported.
Baseline up to Week 48
Number of Participants With Abnormal Ophthalmic Examination Findings
Ophthalmoscopy examination was performed in each eye with findings reported for Vitreous, Optic Nerve, Macula, Retina Periphery. Lens Status and Opacification (Phakic and Pseudophakic) was also performed. Nuclear Cataract, Cortical Cataract, and Posterior Subcapsular Cataract categories was further summarized by severity grade. Ocular biomicroscopic examination was performed with findings reported for Lids/Lashes, Conjunctiva, Cornea, Anterior Chamber, and Iris/Pupil.
Baseline up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=)15, >=10, >=5 Letters From the Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Visual function assessments included BCVA assessment in each eye by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters. BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The letter score ranges from 0 (worse score) to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants with increase in BCVA with greater than or equal to (\>=)15, \>=10, \>=5 letters from the baseline per treatment arm who met the endpoint.
Baseline up to Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=)15, >=10, >=5 Letters From the Baseline in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA)
Visual function assessments included LLVA assessment in each eye by ETDRS letters. LLVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The letter score ranges from 0 (worse score) to 100 (best score), and a gain in LLVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants with increase in LLVA with \>=15, \>=10, \>=5 letters from the baseline per treatment arm who met the endpoint.
Baseline up to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Minnesota Low-vision Reading (MNRead) Test at Week 48
The MNRead acuity cards are continuous-text reading acuity cards suitable for measuring the reading acuity and reading speed of normal and low-vision participants. Formula for reading speed words per minute (wpm): reading speed is equal to 60\*(10 - errors)/ (time in seconds). A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in the reading speed; disease worsening.
Baseline, Week 48
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in Total Complement Factor H (CFH) Concentration in Aqueous Humor
Baseline, Week 32
Mean Change From Baseline in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 48
Baseline, Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Macular Atrophy (MA) Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF)
Baseline up to Week 48
Study Arms (2)
SoC + GEM103
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered SoC therapy defined as aflibercept (2 milligram \[mg\]/50 microliter \[mcL\]) first, followed by GEM103 (500 microgram \[mcg\]/50mcL) 15 minutes later. Administration occurred every other month (EOM) for a total of 6 doses during the 12-month study period.
SoC + Sham
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants were administered SoC therapy defined as aflibercept (2mg/50mcL) first, followed by the Sham injection 15 minutes later. Administration occurred EOM for a total of 6 doses during the 12-month study period.
Interventions
Aflibercept 2 mg/50 mcL (SOC) intravitreal injection Sham intravitreal injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 50 years old at the time of signed informed consent
- Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) related to nAMD with the following features, as determined by the Image Reading Center
- Maximum CNV lesion size of 12 disc areas
- Subretinal hemorrhage less than or equal to (\<=) 50% of lesion size
- On aflibercept treatment prior to Day 1
- Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the study eye between 24 to 75 letters using EDTRS
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of the following ocular conditions in the study eye:
- Any active ocular disease or condition that impact the subject to participate in the study or be a contraindication of IVT injections
- Any intraocular surgery
- Aphakia or complete absence of the posterior capsule
- Prior corneal transplant
- Scar or fibrosis greater than or equal to (\>=) 50% of CNV lesion or involving center of fovea
- Presence of any of the following ocular conditions in either eye:
- History of herpetic infection, idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), pathologic myopia, central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), adult onset foveal pattern dystrophy
- Concurrent disease that could require medical or surgical intervention during the study period
- Active/suspected ocular/periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation
- History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis
- Any prior or ongoing medical condition or clinically significant screening laboratory value that may present a safety risk, interfere with study compliance, interfere with consistent study follow-up, or confound data interpretation throughout the longitudinal follow-up period
- Has experienced a cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event within 12 months of informed consent
- Females must not be pregnant or lactating
- Current use of medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina or optic nerve
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (23)
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 16
Phoenix, Arizona, 85021, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 11
Campbell, California, 95008, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 9
Encino, California, 91436, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 17
Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 12
Pasadena, California, 91107, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 5
Miami, Florida, 33143, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 7
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33782, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 20
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 8
Stuart, Florida, 34994, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 18
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 19
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 4
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 23
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 22
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 1
Reno, Nevada, 89502, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 2
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 15
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 6
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 10
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 13
Beaufort, South Carolina, 29902, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 3
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 21
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Gemini Clinical Trial Site 14
San Antonio, Texas, 78247, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gemini Therapeutics, Inc.
- Organization
- Gemini Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2020
First Posted
December 24, 2020
Study Start
December 29, 2020
Primary Completion
January 10, 2022
Study Completion
February 18, 2022
Last Updated
October 31, 2022
Results First Posted
October 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share