Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope to McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope for Nasal Intubation
Nasal Intubation Using the King Vision Video Laryngoscope:a Randomized,Controlled Comparison With McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was designed to determine the comparison between the King Vision video laryngoscope and McGrath MAC video laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.Patients were divided into 2 groups of 40 patients each.Patients of King Vision group \[n=40\]and Macintosh group \[n=40\]were intubated using respective devices.This study is the first to search the use of King Vision video laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in difficult airway.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2018
CompletedMay 23, 2017
May 1, 2017
1 year
April 14, 2017
May 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time to intubation
from taking of the intubation device to successful intubation
0 min after nasal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Hemodynamic changes
1 min before general anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic changes
1 min after general anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic changes
3 min after general anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic changes
5 min after general anesthesia induction
ease of intubation
5 min after nasal intubation
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
King Vision video laryngoscope
EXPERIMENTALMcGrath MAC video laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
nasal intubation using King Vision video laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
nasal intubation with McGrath MAC video laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status 1-2
- Scheduled for general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation
- Cormach-Lehane score 3-4
You may not qualify if:
- contraindications to nasal intubation
- Patients with a history of anti-hypertensive drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Affililated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2017
First Posted
April 26, 2017
Study Start
May 20, 2017
Primary Completion
May 20, 2018
Study Completion
June 20, 2018
Last Updated
May 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05