Nasal Intubation
7
1
1
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
75% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 47/100
14.3%
1 terminated out of 7 trials
75.0%
-11.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
67%
2 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (7)
Tracheal Tube Cuff Inflation-Deflation Method for Video Assisted Laryngoscope Nasal Intubation in Adults
Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
Nasal Intubation Using King Vision Video Laryngoscopy
Inflation-deflation Method for Nasal Intubation in Pediatric Patients
Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Nasal Intubation
Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope to McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope for Nasal Intubation
Does Altering Magill Forceps Affect Nasal Intubation Time