Nasal Intubation Using King Vision Video Laryngoscopy
Comparison King Vision Video Laryngoscopy 、McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscopy With Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was designed to determine the comparison between the King Vision video laryngoscope 、 McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.Patients were divided into 3 groups of 30 patients each.Patients of King Vision group \[n=30\]、 McGrath MAC group \[n=30\] and Macintosh group\[n=30\]were intubated using respective devices.This study is the first to search the use of King Vision video laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 14, 2020
CompletedSeptember 14, 2020
September 1, 2020
7 months
April 19, 2017
June 15, 2020
September 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Intubation
the interval between opening the mouth and the time when three consecutive end-tidal CO2 waves were appeared on the monitor
0 min after nasal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Laryngoscopy Time
after expose the glottis
Number of Participants With Complications
24h after surgery
Study Arms (3)
King Vision video laryngoscope
EXPERIMENTALMcGrath MAC video laryngoscope
EXPERIMENTALMacintosh
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
nasal intubation using King Vision video laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
nasal intubation using McGrath MAC video laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
nasal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope Device after general anesthesia induction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status 1-2
- general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation
- anticipated difficult airway
You may not qualify if:
- contraindications to nasal intubation
- Patients with a history of anti-hypertensive drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Affililated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011, China
Related Publications (1)
Zhu H, Liu J, Suo L, Zhou C, Sun Y, Jiang H. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0838-z.
PMID: 31470814DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sun Yu
- Organization
- Shanghai ninth people's hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2017
First Posted
April 24, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 5, 2018
Last Updated
September 14, 2020
Results First Posted
September 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09