Comparison Study of the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision Video Laryngoscope in Adult Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
66
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators compare the effectiveness of two relatively new video laryngoscopes, McGrath MAC (Covidien, Dublin Ireland) and the King Vision (King Systems, Noblesville, IN), by practitioners experienced in airway management but with limited exposure to these two devices. Our hypothesis was that, the McGrath MAC device would require fewer intubation attempts and shorter intubation times than the King Vision when performed by novice users.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 24, 2016
CompletedMarch 10, 2017
July 1, 2016
9 months
September 5, 2014
July 24, 2015
January 19, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intubation Success on First Attempt as Measured by End Tidal Carbon Dioxide
participants were followed up to the point the video device is removed from the airway, classified as under 90 seconds.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time to Intubation
Intubation time was initiated at the time of entry of the study device beyond the teeth/gum line and the intubation time was stopped when the study device was removed beyond the same point.
Study Arms (2)
King Vision Video Laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient intubated with the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope
Interventions
Patient intubated with the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Intubation with the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All interested airway providers (Residents, Attendings, Certified Nurse Anesthetist and
- Student Registered Nurse Anesthetist) will be eligible to be included. -
You may not qualify if:
- All patients with difficult airways as determined by history or physical exam (limited oral opening, limited cervical extension, receding chin, Mallampati class III or IV).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bret Alvis
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bret Alvis
Vanderbilt University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2014
First Posted
December 15, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 10, 2017
Results First Posted
August 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07