Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal intubation assisted by GlideScope videolaryngoscopy is faster, easier, and less traumatic than nasal intubation with conventional direct laryngoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2006
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2007
CompletedOctober 29, 2021
September 1, 2007
10 months
November 15, 2006
October 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time to intubation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
ease of intubation (VAS)
incidence of trauma
number of failures
severity of patient sore throat on post-operative day 1
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- any patient who is at least 18 years old
- patient requires nasal intubation for surgical indications
- operator has performed at least 10 prior GlideScope intubations (oral or nasal)
You may not qualify if:
- cervical spine abnormalities
- known difficult airway
- requires rapid sequence induction
- any other patient in whom the attending anesthesiologist believes usage of the GlideScope is contraindicated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A5A5, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philip M Jones, MD
London Health Sciences Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2006
First Posted
November 17, 2006
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
September 1, 2007
Study Completion
September 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2007-09