Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Terms of First Pass Intubation Success Rate, Intubation Time, Glottic View Time, and Complications Related to Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
388
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators studied the efficiency of Macintosh laryngoscope and the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients scheduled for general anesthesia. Best Cormack-Lehane score obtained, glottic view time, intubation time, time to ventilation, correlation between the Mallampati classification and the Cormack-Lehane grades, and complications related to laryngoscopy and intubation has been investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 22, 2018
CompletedDecember 20, 2023
December 1, 2023
6 months
June 22, 2015
October 20, 2015
December 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intubation Success Rate
Endotracheal intubation attempt is defined as entrance of the endotracheal tube into the patient's mouth. Any major change in the alignment of the laryngoscope is defined as another intubation attempt. Successful endotracheal intubation is defined as the endotracheal cuff passing through the patient's vocal cords. Intubation success rate is defined as: 1 / \[the number of attempts\].
less than 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Intubation Time
less than 24 hours
Glottic View Time
less than 24 hours
Cormack-Lehane Score
less than 24 hours
Airway Complications
The participants' will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Study Arms (2)
Macintosh
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients scheduled for general anesthesia during the study period, who had been intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope first and then with KingVision videolaryngoscope.
KingVision
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients scheduled for general anesthesia during the study period, who had been intubated with King Vision videolaryngoscope first and then with Macintosh laryngoscope.
Interventions
Using a Macintosh laryngoscope, time to glottic view, best Cormack-Lehane grade, time to intubation, time to first ventilation has been recorded.
Using a King Vision video laryngoscope, time to glottic view, best Cormack-Lehane grade, time to intubation, time to first ventilation has been recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for general anesthesia
- age higher than 18 years
- age lower than 60 years
You may not qualify if:
- emergency surgery
- mouth opening less than 2 cm
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score higher than 2
- oropharyngeal anomaly
- glottic or supraglottic mass
- history of surgery due to oropharyngeal anomaly, glottic or supraglottic mass
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Rize, 53100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Metzner J, Posner KL, Lam MS, Domino KB. Closed claims' analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;25(2):263-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.02.007.
PMID: 21550550BACKGROUNDWoodall NM, Benger JR, Harper JS, Cook TM. Airway management complications during anaesthesia, in intensive care units and in emergency departments in the UK". Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2(2): 58-64, 2012.
BACKGROUNDYentis SM. Predicting difficult intubation--worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual? Anaesthesia. 2002 Feb;57(2):105-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02515.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11871945BACKGROUNDAkihisa Y, Maruyama K, Koyama Y, Yamada R, Ogura A, Andoh T. Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1666-9. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
PMID: 23812581BACKGROUNDMurphy LD, Kovacs GJ, Reardon PM, Law JA. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope. J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
PMID: 24742495BACKGROUNDYun BJ, Brown CA 3rd, Grazioso CJ, Pozner CN, Raja AS. Comparison of video, optical, and direct laryngoscopy by experienced tactical paramedics. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):442-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.864356. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
PMID: 24460509BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Sample size estimation according to small number of participants; sequential intubation with both laryngoscopes providing an advantage to the second laryngoscope.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Başar Erdivanlı
- Organization
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Başar Erdivanli, Asst. Prof.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univeristy, Medical Faculty, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asst Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2015
First Posted
June 26, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 20, 2023
Results First Posted
February 22, 2018
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share