Study Stopped
Closed due to low enrollment
King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing the intubation success rate and time of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope to the Glidescope video laryngoscope in order to demonstrate the comparability of the devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 23, 2019
CompletedApril 23, 2019
April 1, 2019
4.5 years
December 18, 2014
May 22, 2018
April 1, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time Until Intubation With Each Device
time from the introduction of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity to endotracheal tube reaching the glottic aperture
<100 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation
<100 seconds
Total Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)
<100 seconds
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
during and immediately after procedure (approx 180 minutes)
Study Arms (2)
King Vision Video Laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the King Vision VL
Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient would be randomized to intubation via use of the Glidescope VL
Interventions
Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients scheduled for elective, ambulatory surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who require rapid sequence induction and intubation or fiberoptic intubation.
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Limitations and Caveats
Study terminated early due to clinical equipoise
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Doug Hester
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Hester, MD
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2014
First Posted
December 24, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 23, 2019
Results First Posted
April 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share