Entospletinib Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
ENTO in AML
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Entospletinib (GS-9973) Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
2 other identifiers
interventional
148
3 countries
17
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of entospletinib when administered as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jul 2015
Typical duration for phase_1
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 21, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2019
CompletedNovember 15, 2019
November 1, 2019
3.2 years
January 16, 2015
October 1, 2019
November 13, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLTs refer to toxicities experienced during the first 28 days of study treatment that have been judged to be clinically significant and related to study treatment. DLT assessment was applicable only for Phase 1b and Phase 2 safety run-in participants.
Group A: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 28; Group B: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28; Group C: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28 (Cycle length: for Cycle 0 = 14 days, for all other cycles = 28 days)
Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) at the End of Induction
Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Morphologic CR included CR and cytogenetic CR (CRc). CR required all of the following: \< 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/microliter (mcL); Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis.
At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission at the End of Induction
Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Composite complete remission included CR, CRc, and morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). CR required all of the following: \< 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets.
At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction
Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Overall response included CR, CRc, CRi, and partial remission (PR). CR required all of the following: \< 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets. PR required all of the following: ≥ 50% decrease in blasts in bone marrow aspirate to a range of 5% to 25%; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; Independent of transfusions; and A value of ≤ 5% blasts was also considered a PR if Auer rods were detected.
At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Duration of Exposure of Entospletinib
First dose date up to approximately 3 years
Event Free Survival (EFS)
First dose date up to approximately 38 months
Overall Survival (OS)
First dose date up to approximately 38 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities
First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)
Study Arms (3)
Entospletinib + daunorubicin + cytarabine (Group A)
EXPERIMENTALDose Escalation: Entospletinib up to 400 mg for 14 days and then entospletinib up to 400 mg in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine for up to two 14-day cycles. Dose Expansion: Entospletinib 400 mg for 14 days and then entospletinib 400 mg in combination with daunorubicin and cytarabine for up to two 14-day cycles. Some participants will have the option to receive post-induction therapy with entospletinib 400 mg in combination with cytarabine/cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C). Participants may receive maintenance therapy with 28-day cycles of entospletinib 400 mg for up to twelve 28-day cycles, if the participant is not eligible for stem cell transplant.
Entospletinib + decitabine (Group B)
EXPERIMENTALDose Escalation: Entospletinib 400 mg for 14 days and then entospletinib 400 mg in combination with decitabine for 10 days beginning on Day 1 of every 28-day cycle (at least 2 cycles of induction therapy but no more than 4 cycles). Participants who are intolerant of decitabine may switch to entospletinib monotherapy maintenance at any time after completing the first 2 cycles. Dose Expansion: Entospletinib 400 mg for 14 days for the safety run-in participants or Entospletinib 400 mg for 5 days for the randomization participants. Then entospletinib 400 mg in combination with decitabine or azacitidine (at least 2 cycles of induction therapy but no more than 4 cycles). Some participants will have the option to receive maintenance therapy with entospletinib in combination with decitabine or azacitidine. Participants who are intolerant of decitabine or azacitidine may switch to entospletinib monotherapy maintenance at any time after completing the first 2 cycles.
Entospletinib (Group C)
EXPERIMENTALDose Escalation: Entospletinib up to 800 mg for 28-day cycles until the participant meets criteria for study treatment discontinuation per the study protocol. Dose Expansion: Entospletinib 400 mg for 28-day cycles until the participant meets criteria for study treatment discontinuation per the protocol.
Interventions
Tablet(s) administered orally every 12 hours
60 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously daily on Days 1 to 3 for up to two 14-day induction cycles
100 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously daily on Days 1 to 7 for up to two 14-day cycles
75 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously or subcutaneously
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with AML in need of treatment
- Group A : Individuals ≥ 18 years of age with previously untreated AML by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria who are able and should receive up to 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy with 7+3 as determined by the treating physician
- Group B: Individuals \> 70 years of age with previously untreated AML by WHO criteria; or individuals ≤ 70 years of age with previously untreated AML who refuse or are unable to receive chemotherapy with 7+3 as determined by the treating physician
- Group C: Individuals ≥ 18 years of age with relapsed/refractory AML by WHO criteria; or with relapsed/refractory AML with mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL); or with previously untreated AML by WHO criteria and who would have met disease eligibility criteria for Group A or B but refuse or are unable to receive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agent as determined by the treating physician
You may not qualify if:
- Known active central nervous system or leptomeningeal lymphoma
- Subjects with acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3)
- Treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) within 7 days prior to enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gilead Scienceslead
Study Sites (17)
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute, Inc
Fairway, Kansas, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College - New York - Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, United States
Duke Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Saint Francis Cancer Center
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Princess Margaret
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik II
Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gilead Clinical Study Information Center
- Organization
- Gilead Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gilead Study Director
Gilead Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2015
First Posted
January 22, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 4, 2018
Study Completion
February 21, 2019
Last Updated
November 15, 2019
Results First Posted
November 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share