Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Myelofibrosis
Simplify 1
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Active-controlled Study Evaluating Momelotinib vs. Ruxolitinib in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) or Post-Polycythemia Vera or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET MF)
2 other identifiers
interventional
432
21 countries
113
Brief Summary
This study is to determine the efficacy of momelotinib (MMB) versus ruxolitinib (RUX) in participants with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) or post-polycythemia vera or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF) who have not yet received treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK inhibitor). Participants will be randomized to receive either MMB or ruxolitinib for 24 weeks during a double-blind treatment phase, after which they will be eligible to receive open-label MMB for up to an additional 216 weeks. After discontinuation of study medication, assessments will continue for 12 additional weeks, after which participants will be contacted for survival follow-up approximately every 6 months for up to 5 years from the date of enrollment or until study termination. For those participants planning to continue treatment with MMB following the end of the study, the Early Study Drug Discontinuation (ESDD), 30-day, 12-Week, and survival follow-up visits are not required.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_3
113 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 12, 2023
CompletedMay 12, 2023
May 1, 2023
2.8 years
October 22, 2013
February 23, 2023
May 10, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Splenic Response Rate at Week 24
Splenic response rate at Week 24 is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a spleen volume reduction of ≥ 35% from baseline at the Week 24 assessment as measured by MRI or CT.
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24
Week 24
Rate of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions in the Double-blind Phase, (the Average Number of RBC Units Transfused Per Month Not Associated With Overt Bleeding)
Baseline to Week 24
RBC Transfusion Independence Rate at Week 24, (Defined as Absence of RBC Transfusions and no Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in the 12 Weeks Prior to Week 24, Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)
Week 24
RBC Transfusion Dependence Rate at Week 24. (Defined as Having Had at Least 4 Units of RBC Transfusions, or a Hemoglobin Level Below 8 g/dL in 8 Weeks Prior to Week 24 (Excluding Cases Associated With Clinically Overt Bleeding)).
Week 24
Study Arms (2)
Momelotinib
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive momelotinib plus placebo to match ruxolitinib.
Ruxolitinib
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive ruxolitinib plus placebo to match momelotinib.
Interventions
Momelotinib tablet administered orally once daily
Placebo to match momelotinib tablets administered orally once daily
Placebo to match ruxolitinib tablets administered orally twice daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Palpable splenomegaly at least 5 cm below the left costal margin
- Confirmed diagnosis of PMF or post-PV/ET MF
- Requires myelofibrosis therapy, in the opinion of the investigator
- Classified as high risk OR intermediate-2 risk as defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for PMF, or intermediate-1 risk (IPSS) associated with symptomatic splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia (hemoglobin \< 10.0 g/dL), and/or unresponsive to available therapy
- Acceptable laboratory assessment obtained within 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 0.75 x 10\^9/L in the absence of growth factor in the prior 7 days
- Platelet Count ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L (≥ 100 x 10\^9/L if aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] or alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] is ≥ 2 x the upper limit of the normal range \[ULN\]) in the absence of platelet transfusion(s) or thrombopoietin mimetics in the prior 7 days
- Peripheral blood blast count \< 10%
- AST and ALT ≤ 3 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN if liver is involved by extramedullary hematopoiesis as judged by the investigator or if related to iron chelator therapy that was started within the prior 60 days)
- Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCL) of ≥ 45 mL/min
- Direct bilirubin ≤ 2.0 x ULN
- Life expectancy of \> 24 weeks
- Males and females of childbearing potential must agree to use protocol-specified method(s) of contraception
- Females who are nursing must agree to discontinue nursing before the first dose of study drug
- Able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Prior splenectomy
- Splenic irradiation within 3 months prior to the first dose of study drug
- Eligible for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
- Uncontrolled inter-current illness, per protocol.
- Known positive status for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Chronic active or acute viral hepatitis A, B, or C infection, or a hepatitis B or C carrier
- Prior use of a JAK1 or JAK2 inhibitor
- Use of chemotherapy, immunomodulating therapy, biologic therapy, radiation therapy, or investigational therapy within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug
- Presence of peripheral neuropathy ≥ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 2
- Unwilling or unable to undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (114)
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Escondido, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Stanford, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Parkville, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Unknown Facility
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Unknown Facility
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Unknown Facility
Charleroi, Hainaut, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Antwerp, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Liège, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Pleven, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Rousse, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hradec Králové, Vychodocesky KRAJ, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Brno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Aalborg, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Herlev, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Pierre-Bénite, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, Midi-pyrenees, France
Unknown Facility
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
Unknown Facility
Lens, France
Unknown Facility
Lille, France
Unknown Facility
Marseille, France
Unknown Facility
Nantes, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Pessac, France
Unknown Facility
Villejuif, France
Unknown Facility
München, Bavaria, Germany
Unknown Facility
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
Unknown Facility
Dresden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Düsseldorf, Germany
Unknown Facility
Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mainz, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mannheim, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Kaposvár, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Afula, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ashkelon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ōgaki, Gifu, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kitaku Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Unknown Facility
Osaka, Osaka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Ōsaka-sayama, Osaka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Fukushima, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kumamoto, Japan
Unknown Facility
Matsuyama, Japan
Unknown Facility
Okayama, Japan
Unknown Facility
Maastricht, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Utrecht, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Mazowiekie, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Brzozów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Chorzów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, Poland
Unknown Facility
Arad, Romania
Unknown Facility
Brasov, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Unknown Facility
Iași, Romania
Unknown Facility
Singapore, Singapore
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Unknown Facility
Badalona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Spain
Unknown Facility
Zaragoza, Spain
Unknown Facility
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Örebro, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Stockholm, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Uddevalla, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Leicester, England, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, England, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, England, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Oxford, England, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Mesa RA, Talpaz M, Mazerolle F, Gorsh B, M'Hari M, Regnault A, Ellis C, Wang Z, Purser M, Liu T, Strouse B, Patnaik D. Time Without Transfusion Reliance (TWiTR): Integrating Survival Quality Into Myelofibrosis Treatment Strategies Based on the Phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1, SIMPLIFY-2, and MOMENTUM Trials. EJHaem. 2025 Jun 18;6(3):e70075. doi: 10.1002/jha2.70075. eCollection 2025 Jun.
PMID: 40535755DERIVEDHarrison CN, Mesa R, Talpaz M, Gupta V, Gerds AT, Perkins A, Goh YT, Fox ML, McLornan D, Palmer J, Foltz L, Vannucchi A, Koschmieder S, Passamonti F, Lee SE, Ellis C, Strouse B, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Oh ST. Longitudinal Assessment of Transfusion Intensity in Patients With JAK Inhibitor-Naive or -Experienced Myelofibrosis Treated With Momelotinib. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2025 Mar;25(3):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
PMID: 39516087DERIVEDVerstovsek S, Mesa R, Gupta V, Lavie D, Dubruille V, Cambier N, Platzbecker U, Hus M, Xicoy B, Oh ST, Kiladjian JJ, Vannucchi AM, Gerds A, Egyed M, Mayer J, Sacha T, Kawashima J, Morris M, Huang M, Harrison C. Momelotinib long-term safety and survival in myelofibrosis: integrated analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Blood Adv. 2023 Jul 25;7(14):3582-3591. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009311.
PMID: 37042865DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- Sierra Oncology, a GlaxoSmithKline company
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gilead Study Director
Gilead Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2013
First Posted
October 25, 2013
Study Start
December 6, 2013
Primary Completion
September 12, 2016
Study Completion
May 2, 2019
Last Updated
May 12, 2023
Results First Posted
May 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05