NCT01834274

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasiglifam (TAK-875) plus metformin compared with sitagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control over a 24-week Treatment Period.

Trial Health

68
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Strong global presence with extensive site network
Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
13 countries

104 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 12, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 17, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 28, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

April 12, 2013

Results QC Date

March 27, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Drug Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

    The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at week 24 or final visit relative to Baseline. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Baseline and Week 24

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Week 24

    Week 24

  • Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Baseline and Week 24

Study Arms (2)

Fasiglifam 50 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) 50 mg tablets, orally, once daily, Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily, and metformin stable dose ≥1500 mg (or maximum-tolerated dose), tablets, orally, daily for up to 24 weeks.

Drug: Fasiglifam (TAK-875)Drug: Sitagliptin PlaceboDrug: Metformin

Sitagliptin 100 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sitagliptin 100 mg, tablets, once daily, TAK-875 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily, and metformin stable dose ≥1500 mg (or maximum-tolerated dose), tablets, orally, daily for up to 24 weeks.

Drug: Fasiglifam (TAK-875) PlaceboDrug: SitagliptinDrug: Metformin

Interventions

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) tablets

Fasiglifam 50 mg

Fasiglifam (TAK-875) placebo-matching tablets

Sitagliptin 100 mg

Sitagliptin tablets

Sitagliptin 100 mg

Sitagliptin placebo-matching tablets

Fasiglifam 50 mg

Metformin tablets

Fasiglifam 50 mgSitagliptin 100 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • In the opinion of the investigator, is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
  • The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
  • Is male or female and 18 years of age or older with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
  • Meets one of the following criteria:.
  • Has an HbA1c ≥8% and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of ≥1500 mg (or documented maximum tolerated dose (MTD)) of metformin for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening. This participant will immediately enter the Placebo Run-in Period according to Study Schedule A, or;
  • Has an HbA1c ≥8% and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of \<1500 mg of metformin without documented MTD for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening. After completing the Screening Visit, these participants will have their metformin dose immediately increased to ≥1500 mg (or MTD) for an 8- to 12-week Titration/Stabilization Period according to Study Schedule B. Following stable administration of metformin ≥1500 mg (or MTD) for 8 weeks, the participant must qualify for entry into the Placebo Run-in Period by completing the Week -3 procedures and have an HbA1c ≥8% and \<10.5%.
  • Has had no treatment with anti-diabetic agents other than metformin within 8 weeks prior to Screening (Exception: if a participant has received other anti-diabetic therapy for ≤7 days within the 8 weeks prior to Screening).
  • Has a body mass index (BMI) ≤45 kg/m\^2 at Screening.
  • Participants regularly using other, non-excluded medications must be on a stable dose and regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, as needed use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator. Note: Participants who require initiation of a chronically administered medication(s) due to a disease or condition diagnosed at Screening must be rescreened after the new regimen has been stabilized.
  • A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
  • Is able and willing to monitor glucose with a sponsor-provided home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations in diaries.

You may not qualify if:

  • Has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or has received an investigational anti-diabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.
  • Has been randomized into a previous TAK-875 study.
  • Is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, or sibling) or may consent under duress.
  • Has donated or received any blood products within 12 weeks prior to Screening or is planning to donate blood during the study.
  • Has a hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (≤120 g/L) for males and ≤10 g/dL (≤100 g/L) for females at Screening.
  • Has history of cancer that has been in remission for \<5 years prior to Screening. A history of basal cell carcinoma or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed.
  • Has alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels \>2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening.
  • Has a total bilirubin level \>ULN at Screening. Exception: if a participant has documented Gilbert's Syndrome the participant will be allowed with an elevated bilirubin level per the investigator's discretion.
  • Has serum creatinine ≥1.5mg/dL (≥133μmol/L) if male or ≥1.4 mg/dL (≥124 μmol/L) if female and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 at Screening.
  • Has uncontrolled thyroid disease as determined by the investigator.
  • Has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Has a history of pancreatitis.
  • Has a history of gastric banding or gastric bypass surgery within one year prior to Screening.
  • Has a known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV).
  • Had coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina pectoris, clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG), cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to or at Screening.
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (104)

Unknown Facility

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fresno, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Garden Grove, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Modesto, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Thousand Oaks, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hallandale, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sanford, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Conyers, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Evans, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boise, Idaho, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Augusta, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carlisle, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Medford, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Mill, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Laurens, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Odessa, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Victoria, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Coronel Suárez, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Karlovac, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Krapinske Toplice, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Slavonski Brod, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Virovitica, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Zagreb, Croatia

Location

Unknown Facility

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Gödöllő, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Kistarcsa, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Sátoraljaújhely, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Szeged, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Seri Manjung, Perak, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Taiping, Perak, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Taiping, Perak, Perak, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Putrajaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ica, Peru

Location

Unknown Facility

Lima, Peru

Location

Unknown Facility

Cebu City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Iloilo City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Marikina City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Pasig, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Quezon City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

West Fairview, Quezon City, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Oświęcim, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Rzeszów, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Sobótka, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Zgierz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Barnaul, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kemerovo, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Novosibirsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Rajathevee, Bangkok, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Muang, Changwat Khon Kaen, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Klongluang, Changwat Pathum Thani, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand

Location

Unknown Facility

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kyiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Lviv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Vinnytsia, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Shavadia JS, Sharma A, Gu X, Neaton J, DeLeve L, Holmes D, Home P, Eckel RH, Watkins PB, Granger CB. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-262. doi: 10.1177/1740774519836766. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

TAK-875Sitagliptin PhosphateMetformin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TriazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPyrazinesBiguanidesGuanidinesAmidinesOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director, Clinical Science
Organization
Takeda

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2013

First Posted

April 17, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 1, 2014

Study Completion

March 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 28, 2015

Results First Posted

September 28, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations