Comparison of Two Treatment Regimens (Sitagliptin Versus Liraglutide) on Participants Who Failed to Achieve Good Glucose Control on Metformin Alone (MK-0431-403)
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Sitagliptin-Based Treatment Paradigm to a Liraglutide-Based Treatment Paradigm in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
653
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is being done to compare the effectiveness and safety of two treatment paradigms (oral sitagliptin with or without glimepiride versus liraglutide with or without increased dosing) for the treatment of participants with Type 2 Diabetes that is not adequately controlled with metformin alone. The primary hypothesis postulated that the mean change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (A1C) in participants treated with a sitagliptin-based treatment is non-inferior to that of participants treated with a liraglutide-based treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Mar 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 29, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 29, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 15, 2013
CompletedJune 9, 2017
May 1, 2017
12 months
February 14, 2011
February 5, 2013
May 9, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)
A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.
Baseline and Week 26
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Baseline and Week 26
Percentage of Participants Reaching A1C Goal of <7.0%
Week 26
Percentage of Participants Reaching A1C Goal of <6.5%
Week 26
Study Arms (2)
Sitagliptin +/- glimepiride
EXPERIMENTALSitagliptin 100 mg tablet orally once daily for 26 weeks. Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have received glimepiride orally for glycemic control.
Liraglutide
ACTIVE COMPARATORLiraglutide subcutaneous injection once daily for 26 weeks (starting dose 0.6 mg daily up-titrated to 1.2 mg daily on Day 8). Participants continued their stable dose of metformin \>=1500 mg orally daily. Participants may have had their liraglutide dose uptitrated to 1.8 mg daily for glycemic control.
Interventions
100 mg tablet, orally, once daily.
0.6 mg by subcutaneous (pen) injection, once daily, on Days 1-7; up-titrated on Day 8 to 1.2 mg daily. At Week 12, dose may be increased to 1.8 mg once daily for participants who did not meet protocol-specified glycemic goals.
starting dose of 1 mg tablet (up-titrated as needed), once daily, as needed, after Week 12.
metformin tablets at a dose of ≥1500 mg per day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- On stable dose of metformin monotherapy at a dose of at least 1500 mg per day for at least 12 weeks and a hemoglobin A1C ≥7.0% and ≤11.0%.
- Capable of using a liraglutide pen device.
You may not qualify if:
- History of Type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
- Use of any oral antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) besides metformin, within the prior 12 weeks of screening.
- Cardiovascular disorders within the past 3 months including acute coronary syndrome or new or worsening symptoms of coronary heart disease, coronary artery intervention, stroke, or transient ischemic neurological disorder.
- Impaired liver function.
- Impaired kidney function.
- History of malignancy or clinically important hematological disorder that requires disease-specific treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery) or, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to recur during the duration of the study.
- History of leukemia, lymphoma, aplastic anemia, myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic diseases, thrombocytopenia, or malignant melanoma, regardless of the time since treatment.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant or donate eggs within the projected duration of the study.
- Participation in another study with an investigational drug or device within 12 weeks prior to screening.
- History of hypersensitivity or any contraindication to sitagliptin, liraglutide, glimepiride, or metformin based upon the labels of the country of the investigational site.
- Participation in a weight loss program and not yet in maintenance phase, or starting of a weight loss medication (such as orlistat or phentermine) within the prior 8 weeks.
- Surgery within the prior 4 weeks or major surgery planned during the study.
- Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
- User of recreational or illicit drugs or recent history (within the last year) of drug abuse or increased alcohol consumption.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Charbonnel B, Steinberg H, Eymard E, Xu L, Thakkar P, Prabhu V, Davies MJ, Engel SS. Efficacy and safety over 26 weeks of an oral treatment strategy including sitagliptin compared with an injectable treatment strategy with liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2013 Jul;56(7):1503-11. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2905-1. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
PMID: 23604551DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2011
First Posted
February 15, 2011
Study Start
March 11, 2011
Primary Completion
February 29, 2012
Study Completion
February 29, 2012
Last Updated
June 9, 2017
Results First Posted
March 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/Merck%20Procedure%20on%20Clinical%20Trial%20Data%20Access%20Final\_Updated%20July\_9\_2014.pdf http://engagezone.msd.com/ds\_documentation.php