Study Stopped
Due to potential concerns about liver safety (See Detailed Description)
Efficacy and Safety of TAK-875 Compared to Glimepiride When Used With Metformin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-875 25 mg and 50 mg Compared to Glimepiride When Used in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
10 other identifiers
interventional
2,454
23 countries
226
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-875, once daily (QD), plus metformin compared to glimepiride plus metformin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-875, once daily (QD), plus metformin compared to glimepiride plus metformin in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
226 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 1, 2016
CompletedJune 1, 2016
April 1, 2016
2.2 years
November 25, 2011
July 24, 2015
April 24, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 78 and 104
The change in the value of HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) to be collected at Weeks 78 and 104 relative to baseline.
Baseline and Weeks 78 and 104
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia
Day 1 up to Weeks 78 and 104
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 78 and 104
Baseline and Weeks 78 and 104
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 26 and 52
Baseline and Weeks 26 and 52
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7%
Weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% for Participants Who Did Not Report Hypoglycemia
Weeks 26, 52, 78 and 104
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
TAK-875 25 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALTAK-875 50 mg QD
EXPERIMENTALGlimepiride 1-2 mg QD
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
TAK-875 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin ≥1500 mg or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for up to 104 weeks.
Glimepiride 1 mg, tablets, orally, once daily (up-titrated to 2 mg after 1 week of treatment. Up-titrated to a maximum of 6 mg in 2 mg increments/down titrated if recurrent (or severe) hypoglycemia occurs) and metformin ≥1500 mg or MTD for up to 104 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
- The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- The participant is male or female and 18 years of age or older with a historical diagnosis of T2DM.
- The participant meets one of the following criteria:
- The participant has an HbA1c level ≥7.0 and \<10.0%, and has been on a stable daily dose of ≥1500 mg (or documented MTD) of metformin for at least 2 months prior to Screening. This participant will immediately enter the Placebo Run-in Period, or;
- The participant has an HbA1c level ≥ 7.5 and \<10.5%, and has been on a stable daily dose of \<1500 mg of metformin without documented MTD for at least 2 months prior to Screening. After completing the Screening Visit, this participant will have their metformin dose immediately increased to ≥1500 mg (or MTD) for an 8-week Titration Period. Following this 8-week period, the participant must qualify for entry into the Placebo Run-in Period by completing the Week -3 procedures and having an HbA1c concentration ≥7.0 and \<10.0%.
- The participant has had no treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin within 2 months prior to Screening (Exception: if a participant has received other antidiabetic therapy for ≤7 days within the 2 months prior to Screening).
- The participant has a body mass index (BMI) of ≤45 kg/m2 at Screening.
- Participants regularly using other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, PRN (as needed) use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
- The participant is able and willing to monitor glucose with a home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations and complete participant diaries.
- The participant has an HbA1c concentration ≥7.0% and \<10.0%, and a FPG ≤270 mg/dL (15.0 mmol/L) at the Week -1 Visit. (If the subject does not qualify for randomization based on these criteria, the assessment may be repeated weekly, for a maximum of 2 additional weeks).
- The participant's compliance with the single-blind study medication during the Placebo Run-in Period is at least 75% and does not exceed 125% based on tablet/capsule counts performed by the study staff.
- A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative urine hCG pregnancy test at Baseline (Day 1) prior to Randomization and prior to administration of the first dose of double-blind study medication.
You may not qualify if:
- The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or has received an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.
- The participant has been randomized into a previous TAK-875 study
- The participant is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependant relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
- The participant donated or received any blood products within 12 weeks prior to Screening or is planning to donate blood during the study.
- The participant has a hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (≤120 gm/L) for males and ≤10 g/dL (≤100 gm/L) for females at Screening.
- The participant has history of cancer that has been in remission for \<5 years prior to Screening. A history of basal cell carcinoma or stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed.
- The participant has alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels \>2.0x upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening.
- The participant has a total bilirubin level greater than the ULN at Screening. Exception: if a participant has documented Gilbert's Syndrome the participant will be allowed with an elevated bilirubin level per the investigator's discretion.
- The participant has a serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL(males) and ≥1.4 mg/dL(females) and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m2 at Screening.
- The participant has uncontrolled thyroid disease.
- The participant has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
- The participant has had gastric banding, or gastric bypass surgery within one year prior to Screening.
- The participant has a known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C virus (HCV).
- The participant had coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG), cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to or at Screening.
- The participant has a history of hypersensitivity, allergies, or has had an anaphylactic reaction(s) to any component of TAK-875, metformin, or glimepiride.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (226)
Unknown Facility
Dothan, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Goodyear, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Mission Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
North Hollywood, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Norwalk, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Pismo Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Topeka, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Flint, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Calabash, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Mooresville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Morganton, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Maumee, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Greer, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
El Paso, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
New Braunfels, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Spring, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Tomball, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Burke, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Hampton, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Manassas, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Corrientes, Corrientes Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Unknown Facility
Brookvale, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Woy Woy, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Canberra, Australia
Unknown Facility
Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Gabrovo, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Pleven, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sevlievo, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Laval, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Mirabel, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Bogotá, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Medellín, Colombia
Unknown Facility
Benátky nad Jizerou, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Brno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Choceň, Czechia
Unknown Facility
České Budějovice, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Jindřichův Hradec, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Mariánské Lázně, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Olomouc, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava - Moravska Ostrava, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ostrava - Vitkovice, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Praha 4 - Krc, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Znojmo, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Paide, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Rakvere, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Saku, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tallinn, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tartu, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Võru, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Unknown Facility
New Territories, Hong Kong
Unknown Facility
Ashkelon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Beer Yaakov, Israel
Unknown Facility
Beersheba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Giv‘atayim, Israel
Unknown Facility
Hadera, Israel
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Holon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jerusalem, Israel
Unknown Facility
Kfar Saba, Israel
Unknown Facility
Nahariya, Israel
Unknown Facility
Petah Tikva, Israel
Unknown Facility
Raanana, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, Israel
Unknown Facility
Rehovot, Israel
Unknown Facility
Rishon LeZiyyon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Safed, Israel
Unknown Facility
Tel Aviv, Israel
Unknown Facility
Jelgava, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Limbaži, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Ogre, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Talsi, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Valmiera, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Alytus, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Malacca, Melaka, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Taiping, Perak, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Taiping, Perak, Perak, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Putrajaya, Putrajaya, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Terengganu, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Auckland, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Christchurch, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Hamilton, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Palmerston North, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Rotorua, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Tauranga, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Wellington, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Cebu City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Davao City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Iloilo City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Lipa City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Quezon City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Tarlac City, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Taytay, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, Poland
Unknown Facility
Katowice, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Oświęcim, Poland
Unknown Facility
Parczew, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Puławy, Poland
Unknown Facility
Płock, Poland
Unknown Facility
Ruda Śląska, Poland
Unknown Facility
Rzeszów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Sopot, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Zgierz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Łęczyca, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bacau, Romania
Unknown Facility
Baia Mare, Romania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Constanța, Romania
Unknown Facility
Iași, Romania
Unknown Facility
Oradea, Romania
Unknown Facility
Ploieşti, Romania
Unknown Facility
Târgu Mureş, Romania
Unknown Facility
Timișoara, Romania
Unknown Facility
Kazan', Russia
Unknown Facility
Kemerovo, Russia
Unknown Facility
Krasnoyarsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Novosibirsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, Russia
Unknown Facility
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Kempton Park, Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Krugersdorp, Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Middelburg, Mpumalanga, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Somerset West, Western Cape, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Worcester, Western Cape, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Chia-Yi City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taichung, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Tainan, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kiev, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kyiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Luhansk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Lviv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Mykolayiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Poltava, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ternopil, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Cheadle, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Watford, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Thornton-Cleveleys, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Swansea, South Glamorgan, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Shavadia JS, Sharma A, Gu X, Neaton J, DeLeve L, Holmes D, Home P, Eckel RH, Watkins PB, Granger CB. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-262. doi: 10.1177/1740774519836766. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30880443DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Senior Medical Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2011
First Posted
November 29, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 1, 2016
Results First Posted
June 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04