Comparison of TAK-875 (Fasiglifam) With Placebo in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Oral TAK-875 25 mg and 50 mg Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
3 other identifiers
interventional
421
8 countries
95
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-875 (fasiglifam), once daily (QD), in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
Started Nov 2011
Typical duration for phase_3 diabetes-mellitus-type-2
95 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 5, 2016
CompletedApril 5, 2016
March 1, 2016
1.7 years
October 18, 2011
April 8, 2015
March 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 24 relative to Baseline. A mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, country, visit and visit by treatment interaction as fixed factors and with Baseline value and Baseline value by visit interaction as covariates with an unstructured covariance structure was used for analysis.
Baseline and Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Incidence of HbA1c <7%
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Following a Meal Tolerance Test (MTT)
Baseline and Week 24
Study Arms (3)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORFasiglifam placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Fasiglifam 25 mg
EXPERIMENTALFasiglifam 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Fasiglifam 50 mg
EXPERIMENTALFasiglifam 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
- The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- The participant is male or female and 18 years of age or older with a historical diagnosis of T2DM.
- The participant has been treated with only diet and exercise for at least 12 weeks prior to Screening and has an HbA1c concentration between 7.0 % and 10.5%, inclusive, at Screening.
- The participant has received ≤7 days of any antidiabetic agent within 12 weeks prior to Screening.
- The participant has a body mass index (BMI) ≤45 kg/m\^2 at Screening.
- Participants regularly using other, non-excluded medications must be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, as needed (PRN) use of prescription or over-the-counter medication is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
- The participant is able and willing to monitor glucose with a home glucose monitor and consistently record his or her own blood glucose concentrations and complete participant diaries.
- A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to use routinely adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
- The participant has an HbA1c concentration between 7.0 and 10.5%, inclusive, and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤270 mg/dL (≤15.0 mmol/L) at Week -1 Visit. (If the participant does not qualify for randomization based on these criteria, the assessments may be repeated weekly, for a maximum of 2 additional weeks).
- The participant's overall compliance with single-blind study medication during the Placebo Run-in Period is at least 75% and does not exceed 125% based on tablet counts performed by the study staff.
- A female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative urine hCG pregnancy test at Baseline (Visit 4) prior to Randomization and prior to administration of the first dose of double-blind study medication
You may not qualify if:
- The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening or has received an investigational antidiabetic drug within 3 months prior to Screening.
- The participant has been randomized in a previous TAK-875 study.
- The participant is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, or sibling; biological or legally adopted) or may consent under duress.
- The participant donated or received any blood products within 12 weeks prior to Screening or is planning to donate blood during the study.
- The participant has a hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL (≤120 gm/L) for males and ≤10 g/dL (≤100 gm/L) for females at Screening.
- The participant has a history of cancer that has been in remission for \<5 years prior to Screening. A history of basal cell carcinoma or stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin is allowed.
- The participant has an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels \>2.0x the upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening.
- The participant has a total bilirubin level greater than the ULN at Screening. Exception: if a participant has documented Gilbert's Syndrome, the participant will be allowed with an elevated bilirubin level per the investigator's discretion.
- The participant has a serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL(≥133 µmol/L) \[males\] and ≥1.4 mg/dL (≥124 µmol/L) \[females\] and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 at Screening.
- The participant has uncontrolled thyroid disease.
- The participant has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
- The participant has had gastric banding or gastric bypass surgery within one year prior to Screening.
- The participant has a known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C virus (HCV).
- The participant had coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG), cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior or at Screening.
- The participant has a history of hypersensitivity, allergies, or has had an anaphylactic reaction(s) to any component of TAK-875.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (95)
Unknown Facility
Dothan, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Goodyear, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
North Hollywood, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Norwalk, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Springs, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Pismo Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Largo, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenfield, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Muncie, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Topeka, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Flint, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Picayune, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Mooresville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Morganton, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Maumee, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Harleysville, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Levittown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Greer, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Crossville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Carrollton, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
El Pasco, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Irving, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
New Braunfels, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Spring, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Tomball, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Burke, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Manassas, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Corrientes, Corrientes Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Villa Cabrera, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Mendoza, Mendoza Province, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Byala, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Rousse, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Guatemala City, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Quetzaltenango, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Zacapa, Guatemala
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Kecskemét, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Komárom, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szikszó, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Dolný Kubín, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Komárno, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Levice, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Pezinok, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Prievidza, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Trebišov, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Trenčín, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Žilina, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kyiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Odesa, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Simferopol, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ternopil, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
Related Publications (1)
Shavadia JS, Sharma A, Gu X, Neaton J, DeLeve L, Holmes D, Home P, Eckel RH, Watkins PB, Granger CB. Determination of fasiglifam-induced liver toxicity: Insights from the data monitoring committee of the fasiglifam clinical trials program. Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):253-262. doi: 10.1177/1740774519836766. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PMID: 30880443DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director, Clinical Science
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Senior Medical Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2011
First Posted
October 20, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 5, 2016
Results First Posted
April 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03