Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide (Revlimid ®) Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
1 other identifier
interventional
111
8 countries
54
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare lenalidomide to a control drug and see which one delays Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) disease progression longer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_2
54 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 4, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 20, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 5, 2018
CompletedNovember 25, 2019
November 1, 2019
2.8 years
July 29, 2010
July 31, 2014
November 13, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response According to the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Cheson 1999 and Evaluated by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
An overall response is a complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR) and was evaluated by the IRAC. A CR = complete disappearance of disease and related symptoms. Lymph nodes and nodal masses regressed on computed tomography to normal size (≤ 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm prior to therapy and ≤ 1.0 cm in their short axis for nodes 1.1-1.5 cm in their long axis and \> 1.0 cm in their short axis prior to therapy). Spleen and/or liver not palpable on exam, normal size by imaging, and absence of nodules related to lymphoma. If bone marrow was involved prior to therapy, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat biopsy. PR = ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules regressed by ≥ 50% in their SPD or for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter;no new disease.
From the date of randomization to the data cut-off of 4 July 2013; when all patients reached the scheduled 16-week assessment or had progressed/died before the scheduled 16-week assessment); the median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response According to the IWG Response Criteria Based on the Investigators Assessment at the Final Data Cut During the Core Treatment Phase
Response was defined as having a CR, CRu or PR, based on IWG 1999 Response Criteria for NHL as evaluated by the investigators. CR = complete disappearance of disease and disease related symptoms. All lymph nodes and nodal masses regressed on computed tomography to normal size (≤ 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm prior to therapy and ≤ 1.0 cm in their short axis for nodes 1.1-1.5 cm in their long axis and \> 1.0 cm in their short axis prior to therapy). Spleen and/or liver not palpable on physical exam, normal size by imaging, and absence of nodules related to lymphoma. If BM was involved prior to therapy, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat biopsy. PR = ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in the other nodes, liver, or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules regressed by ≥ 50% in their SPD or, for single nodules, in the greatest transverse diameter. No new disease.
From the date of randomization to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events (TEAEs) in the Overall Treatment Phase by Initial Treatment Assignment
From first dose of study drug to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Stage 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Approximately 3.5 years
Stage 2: Duration of Response (DoR)
Approximately 3.5 years
Stage 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Approximately 3.5 years
Stage 2: Duration of Complete Response
Approximately 3.5 years
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (7)
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With a Durable Overall Response (dORR) According to the IWG Response Criteria as Assessed by the Investigators at the Final Data Cut During the Core Treatment Phase
From the date of randomization to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Stage 1: Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response According to the IWG Response Criteria as Assessed by the Investigators at the Final Data Cut During the Core Treatment Phase
From the date of randomization to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
Stage 1: Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of Overall Response (DoR) as Assessed by the Investigators at the Final Data Cut During the Core Treatment Phase
From the date of randomization to the final data cut-off date of 18 May 2018; median study duration was 27.0 and 19.7 weeks, respectively.
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lenalidomide
EXPERIMENTALLenalidomide 25 mg capsules by mouth on days 1-21 of each 28 day cycle. For patients with Creatinine Clearance ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Investigators Choice
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne of the following: Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Rituximab, or Etoposide
Interventions
Lenalidomide 25 mg orally for 21/28 days until Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) progressive disease. For patients with Creatinine Clearance ≥ 30 mL/min but \< 60 mL/min, lenalidomide 10 mg (max escalation is 15 mg).
Suggested starting doses and regimens for Gemcitabine is 1,250 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) administration on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles or 1,000 mg/m\^2 IV days 1 and 15 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Suggested starting dose and regimen for Oxaliplatin is 100 mg/m\^2 IV day 1 for 21 days for 6 Cycles
Suggested starting dose for Rituximab is 375 mg/m\^2 IV days 1, 8, 15, 22 during Cycle 1, and if stable disease at Week 12, also on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10 (CD20+ patients only)
Suggested starting doses for Etoposide are: 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-5 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 100 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-21 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-14 every 28 days for 6 Cycles, or 50 mg/m\^2 oral days 1-10 every 28 days for 6 Cycles
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).
- Relapsed or refractory to combination chemotherapy for DLBCL that contains rituximab and an anthracycline, and one additional combination chemotherapy or stem cell transplant.
- Measurable DLBCL disease by computed tomograph (CT) / magnetic resonance imagining (MRI).
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 - 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of lymphoma histologies other than DLBCL.
- History of malignancies, other than DLBCL, unless the patient has been disease free for 3 years or more.
- Eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.
- Known seropositive for, or history of, active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV)
- Neuropathy grade 4.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celgenelead
Study Sites (57)
Providence St Joseph Medical Center/Cancer Center
Burbank, California, 91505, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, United States
University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
Hattiesburg Clinic
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39402, United States
Washington University Siteman Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263, United States
Avera Cancer Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
MD Anderson Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, 5000, Australia
Royal Brisbaine and Womens Hospital
Herston, 4029, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia
Innsbruck University Hospital
Innsbruck, A6020, Austria
Universitätsklinikum Salzburg
Salzburg, A-5020, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, A-1090, Austria
University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, 5005, Czechia
Charles University
Prague, 12808, Czechia
ICH CHU Brest- C.H.U. MORAVAN
Brest, 29609, France
CHU de Grenoble-Hopital Albert Michallon
Grenoble, 38043, France
Chd -Vendee
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85205, France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Lyon, 69495, France
Institute Paoli-Calmette
Marsielle, 13009, France
Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44903, France
Hôpital Saint Jean
Perpignan, 66046, France
CHRU-Hopital du Haut -Leveque
Pessac, 33604, France
CHU de Rennes Hopital de Pontchaillou
Rennes, 35033, France
University Hospital OF Toulouse Purpan
Toulouse, 31059, France
Hopital de Brabois Adultes
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511, France
Istituto di Ematologica Istituto di Ematologica " L.e. A. Seragnoli' Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico
Bologna, 40138, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
Florence, 50141, Italy
Clinica Ematologica, A.O.U. San Martino di Genova
Genova, 16132, Italy
IEO istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Miano, 201401, Italy
Universita Federico II di Napoli Nuovo Policlinico
Napoli, 80131, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Irccs/Crob
Rionero in Vulture (PZ), 85208, Italy
Policlinico Tor Vergata (Universta Tor Vergata)
Roma, 00133, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugai Ospedale S. Maria della Miseri
Terni, 6156, Italy
Hospital Universitari Vll D' Hebron
Barcelona, 8035, Spain
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14004, Spain
Hospital Costa Del Sol
Marbella, 29600, Spain
CH de Orense
Ourense, 32005, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, 31008, Spain
Hosptial Clinico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007, Spain
Onkologiska kliniken
Umeå, 90185, Sweden
Akademiska Sjukhuset
Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
Royal Bournemouth Hospital Haematology
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Haematology Department
Exeter, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
St. James Institute of Oncology
Leeds, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
Royal Mardsen Hospital - Fulham (Satellite Site)
London, SW3 6U, United Kingdom
The Christie Foundation Trust, I'st Floor, Haemotology Oncology Outpatients, Lymphoma Team
Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
Derrford Hospital
Plymouth, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
Southhampton University Hospital NHS Trust
Southhampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Royal Mardsen NHS Foundation Trust
Sutton, SM2 SPT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Czuczman MS, Trneny M, Davies A, Rule S, Linton KM, Wagner-Johnston N, Gascoyne RD, Slack GW, Brousset P, Eberhard DA, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Salles G, Witzig TE, Zinzani PL, Wright GW, Staudt LM, Yang Y, Williams PM, Lih CJ, Russo J, Thakurta A, Hagner P, Fustier P, Song D, Lewis ID. A Phase 2/3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):4127-4137. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2818. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
PMID: 28381416RESULTHernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G, Zinzani PL, Pileri SA, Malik F, Macon WR, Goy A, Witzig TE, Czuczman MS. Higher response to lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in nongerminal center B-cell-like than in germinal center B-cell-like phenotype. Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5058-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26135. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
PMID: 21495023DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
On 29 January 2013 the Stage 1 portion of the study was met and enrollment stopped. The Stage 1 results as assessed by the IRAC demonstrated that neither subtype met the prespecified requirement to be further studied in Stage 2.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne McClain
- Organization
- Celgene
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adrian Kilcoyne, MD
Celgene Corporation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2010
First Posted
September 9, 2010
Study Start
September 2, 2010
Primary Completion
July 4, 2013
Study Completion
April 5, 2018
Last Updated
November 25, 2019
Results First Posted
August 20, 2014
Record last verified: 2019-11