Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
An Intergroup Phase II Clinical Trial for Adolescents and Young Adults With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
3 other identifiers
interventional
318
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 leukemia
Started Mar 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2 leukemia
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2007
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 24, 2024
CompletedApril 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
8.5 years
November 14, 2007
January 21, 2020
April 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Complete Response Rate
Complete response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve bone marrow response (defined using the M bone marrow criteria for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); if M0 to M1 status (blast cells ,5%) was achieved by the end of induction or extended induction, the patient was considered a responder) at the end of induction therapy.
Up to 8 years post-registration
Event-free Survival
EFS was defined as time from registration in this study to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: failure to achieve bone marrow response (defined using the M bone marrow criteria for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); if M0 to M1 status (blast cells ,5%) was achieved by the end of induction or extended induction, the patient was considered a responder) by day 60, death, relapse at any site, or development of second malignant disease.
Up to 8 years post-registration
Disease-free Survival
DFS was defined as time from bone marrow response in this study to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: failure to achieve bone marrow response (defined using the M bone marrow criteria for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); if M0 to M1 status (blast cells ,5%) was achieved by the end of induction or extended induction, the patient was considered a responder) by day 60, death, relapse at any site, or development of second malignant disease.
Up to 8 years post-registration
Overall Survival
OS was defined from registration to death resulting from any cause.
Up to 8 years post-registration
Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Event at Least Possibly Related to Treatment (Toxicity)
The number of participants who experienced toxicity (defined as at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event at least possibly related to treatment) is reported below.
Up to 10 years post-registration
Other Outcomes (4)
Analysis and Description of the Outcomes of Patients Treated on This Study According to Baseline Psychosocial Characteristics, Demographics, and Family Support
Up to 10 years post-registration
Outcomes of Patients Treated on This Study According to Pretreatment Characteristics Such as Age, Gender, White Blood Cell Count, Other Hematologic Parameters, Blood Chemistry, Immunophenotype, Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetic Characteristics
Up to 10 years post-registration
Adherence of Adult Hematologists/Oncologists and Their Patients to a "Pediatric" Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treatment Regimen and Identification of Reasons for Variances
Up to 10 years post-registration
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy)
EXPERIMENTALPatients are given a series of leukemia treatments that are divided into several sequential courses and different chemotherapy combinations of treatment. Please see the "Detailed Description" section for more information.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Bleyer A: Older adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the United States: from the lowest to highest death rate and number of deaths--more rationale for the CALBG-SWOG-ECOG C10403 trial based on COG AALL0232. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-18034, 2008.
BACKGROUNDAdvani AS, Larsen E, Laumann K, Luger SM, Liedtke M, Devidas M, Chen Z, Yin J, Foster MC, Claxton D, Coffan K, Tallman MS, Appelbaum FR, Erba H, Stone RM, Hunger SP, McNeer JL, Loh ML, Raetz E, Winick N, Carroll W, Larson RA, Stock W. Comparison of CALGB 10403 (Alliance) and COG AALL0232 toxicity results in young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 26;5(2):504-512. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002439.
PMID: 33496745DERIVEDStock W, Luger SM, Advani AS, Yin J, Harvey RC, Mullighan CG, Willman CL, Fulton N, Laumann KM, Malnassy G, Paietta E, Parker E, Geyer S, Mrozek K, Bloomfield CD, Sanford B, Marcucci G, Liedtke M, Claxton DF, Foster MC, Bogart JA, Grecula JC, Appelbaum FR, Erba H, Litzow MR, Tallman MS, Stone RM, Larson RA. A pediatric regimen for older adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of CALGB 10403. Blood. 2019 Apr 4;133(14):1548-1559. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-881961. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
PMID: 30658992DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Wendy Stock, MD
- Organization
- University of Chicago
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Wendy Stock, M.D.
University of Chicago
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2007
First Posted
November 15, 2007
Study Start
March 12, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 24, 2024
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Results First Posted
January 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2026-04