Genetic Testing or Clinical Assessment in Determining the Need for Chemotherapy in Women With Breast Cancer That Involves No More Than 3 Lymph Nodes
MINDACT
MINDACT (Microarray In Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy): A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the 70-Gene Signature With the Common Clinical-Pathological Criteria in Selecting Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Nodes
7 other identifiers
interventional
6,600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Estrogen can cause the growth of breast cancer cells. Hormone therapy using tamoxifen may fight breast cancer by blocking the use of estrogen by the tumor cells. Letrozole may fight breast cancer by lowering the amount of estrogen the body makes. Giving chemotherapy and hormone therapy after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. It is not yet known whether genetic testing is more effective than clinical assessment in determining the need for chemotherapy in treating breast cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying genetic testing to see how well it works compared with clinical assessment in determining the need for chemotherapy in women with breast cancer that is either node-negative or involves no more than 3 lymph nodes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Feb 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_3 breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 17, 2022
November 1, 2022
13.1 years
February 8, 2007
November 16, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years
o The primary endpoint for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy (R-T) is that the 5-year distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) of 92% will be tested (a one-sided test).
from enrollment/randomization
Disease-free survival (DFS)
o The primary endpoint for the chemotherapy randomization (R-C) is disease free survival (DFS).
from enrollment/randomization
DFS
The primary test for the endocrine randomization (R-E) is DFS.
from enrollment/randomization
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Proportion of patients treated with chemotherapy based on clinical prognosis compared to 70-gene signature prognosis
from enrollment
Overall survival at 5 years
from enrollment/randomization
DFS at 5 years
from enrollment/randomization
Safety (early and late)
from registration
Overall survival at 5 years
from enrollment/randomization
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Chemotherapy randomization: Arm I (anthracycline-based)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* FEC 100 * Canadian CEF * CAF * FAC * E-CMF
Chemotherapy randomization: Arm II (docetaxel and capecitabine)
EXPERIMENTAL* Docetaxel * Capecitabine
Endocrine therapy randomization: Arm I
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2 years of tamoxifen followed by 5 years of letrozole
Endocrine therapy randomization: Arm II
EXPERIMENTAL7 years of letrozole
Treatment decision randomization: Arm I
ACTIVE COMPARATORchemotherapy-decision-making according to clinical criteria (using Adjuvant! Online)
Treatment decision randomization: Arm II
EXPERIMENTALchemotherapy-decision-making according to genomic prognosis using the 70-gene signature
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTClead
- Agendiacollaborator
- Breast International Groupcollaborator
- Roche Pharma AGcollaborator
- Novartiscollaborator
- Sanoficollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Related Publications (11)
Mook S, Bonnefoi H, Pruneri G, Larsimont D, Jaskiewicz J, Sabadell MD, MacGrogan G, Van't Veer LJ, Cardoso F, Rutgers EJ. Daily clinical practice of fresh tumour tissue freezing and gene expression profiling; logistics pilot study preceding the MINDACT trial. Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(7):1201-1208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
PMID: 19232484BACKGROUNDCardoso F, Van't Veer L, Rutgers E, Loi S, Mook S, Piccart-Gebhart MJ. Clinical application of the 70-gene profile: the MINDACT trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):729-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.3222.
PMID: 18258980BACKGROUNDCardoso F, Piccart-Gebhart M, Van't Veer L, Rutgers E; TRANSBIG Consortium. The MINDACT trial: the first prospective clinical validation of a genomic tool. Mol Oncol. 2007 Dec;1(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
PMID: 19383299BACKGROUNDMook S, Van't Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Cardoso F. Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2007 May-Jun;4(3):147-55.
PMID: 17878518BACKGROUNDBogaerts J, Cardoso F, Buyse M, Braga S, Loi S, Harrison JA, Bines J, Mook S, Decker N, Ravdin P, Therasse P, Rutgers E, van 't Veer LJ, Piccart M; TRANSBIG consortium. Gene signature evaluation as a prognostic tool: challenges in the design of the MINDACT trial. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006 Oct;3(10):540-51. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0591.
PMID: 17019432BACKGROUNDViale G, Slaets L, Bogaerts J, Rutgers E, Van't Veer L, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, de Snoo FA, Stork-Sloots L, Russo L, Dell'Orto P, van den Akker J, Glas A, Cardoso F; TRANSBIG Consortium & the MINDACT Investigators. High concordance of protein (by IHC), gene (by FISH; HER2 only), and microarray readout (by TargetPrint) of ER, PgR, and HER2: results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial. Ann Oncol. 2014 Apr;25(4):816-823. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu026.
PMID: 24667714RESULTRutgers E, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Bogaerts J, Delaloge S, Veer LV, Rubio IT, Viale G, Thompson AM, Passalacqua R, Nitz U, Vindevoghel A, Pierga JY, Ravdin PM, Werutsky G, Cardoso F. The EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial is feasible: results of the pilot phase. Eur J Cancer. 2011 Dec;47(18):2742-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
PMID: 22051734RESULTAlaeikhanehshir S, Ajayi T, Duijnhoven FH, Poncet C, Olaniran RO, Lips EH, van 't Veer LJ, Delaloge S, Rubio IT, Thompson AM, Cardoso F, Piccart M, Rutgers EJT. Locoregional Breast Cancer Recurrence in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT Trial: Analysis of Risk Factors Including the 70-Gene Signature. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr 1;42(10):1124-1134. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02690. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
PMID: 38241603DERIVEDPiccart M, van 't Veer LJ, Poncet C, Lopes Cardozo JMN, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Vuylsteke P, Brain E, Vrijaldenhoven S, Neijenhuis PA, Causeret S, Smilde TJ, Viale G, Glas AM, Delorenzi M, Sotiriou C, Rubio IT, Kummel S, Zoppoli G, Thompson AM, Matos E, Zaman K, Hilbers F, Fumagalli D, Ravdin P, Knox S, Tryfonidis K, Peric A, Meulemans B, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F, Rutgers EJT. 70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):476-488. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00007-3. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
PMID: 33721561DERIVEDDelaloge S, Piccart M, Rutgers E, Litiere S, van 't Veer LJ, van den Berkmortel F, Brain E, Dudek-Peric A, Gil-Gil M, Gomez P, Hilbers FS, Khalil Z, Knox S, Kuemmel S, Kunz G, Lesur A, Pierga JY, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Thompson AM, Viale G, Zoppoli G, Vuylsteke P, Tryfonidis K, Poncet C, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F; MINDACT investigators and the TRANSBIG Consortium. Standard Anthracycline Based Versus Docetaxel-Capecitabine in Early High Clinical and/or Genomic Risk Breast Cancer in the EORTC 10041/BIG 3-04 MINDACT Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01371. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
PMID: 32083990DERIVEDCardoso F, van't Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Brain E, Causeret S, DeLorenzi M, Glas AM, Golfinopoulos V, Goulioti T, Knox S, Matos E, Meulemans B, Neijenhuis PA, Nitz U, Passalacqua R, Ravdin P, Rubio IT, Saghatchian M, Smilde TJ, Sotiriou C, Stork L, Straehle C, Thomas G, Thompson AM, van der Hoeven JM, Vuylsteke P, Bernards R, Tryfonidis K, Rutgers E, Piccart M; MINDACT Investigators. 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253.
PMID: 27557300DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Emiel Rutgers, MD, PhD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- STUDY CHAIR
Martine Piccart-Gebhart, MD, PhD
Jules Bordet Institute
- STUDY CHAIR
Fatima Cardoso, MD
Champalimaud Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2007
First Posted
February 12, 2007
Study Start
February 1, 2007
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11