Evaluation of Heart Failure Treatment Guided by N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) vs Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone
A Randomised, Single Blind, Multicentre, 9-month, Phase IV Study, Comparing Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs and NT-proBNP vs Treatment Guided by Clinical Symptoms and Signs Alone, in Patients With Heart Failure (HF) and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
3 other identifiers
interventional
252
1 country
39
Brief Summary
The purpose is to study if HF treatment guided by NTproBNP in addition to clinical symptoms and signs is more effective than treatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs alone in patients with HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 heart-failure
Started Oct 2006
39 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 18, 2012
CompletedJune 25, 2012
June 1, 2012
2.3 years
October 19, 2006
May 10, 2010
June 18, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite Value of 3 Variables After 9 Months: Cardiovascular Death (Days Alive), Cardiovascular Hospitalization (Days Out of Hospital), Heart Failure Symptoms (Symptom Score Subset of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Questions 3,5,7,9)
The non-parametric scale is constructed from 3 variables, modified after Cleland. Each patient receives a rank score from 1 to 246 (246-number of patients in the study). The lowest score receive patients who die (due to CV event), next patients still alive at end-of-study with the worst composite score, the best alive patients with 0 days in hospital and the largest improvement in the KCCQ (self-administered by patient symptom score, where the higher score reflect better health status). Scores will be summarized using non-parametric calculations. The mean of non-parametric scores is presented
9 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of CV Deaths
9 months
Number of Days in Hospital for CV Reason
9 months
Changes in Heart Failure Symptoms
9 months and baseline
Changes in NT-proBNP Values Over Time in All Patients
9 months and baseline
Changes in Health-related Quality of Life
9 months and baseline
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Guided by NT-proBNP
OTHERTreatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs + NTproBNP
Not Guided by NT-proBNP
OTHERTreatment guided by clinical symptoms and signs
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female/male, over 18 years with previously verified HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
- New York Heart Association(NYHA) class II-IV,
- NTproBNP males\>800 ng/L, females \>1000 ng/L
You may not qualify if:
- Planned CV hospitalisation, stroke or acute myocardial infarction (MI) last 3 months,
- Mitral/aortic stenosis,
- Patients already receiving optimal HF treatment,
- Severe reduction of kidney function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (39)
Research Site
Alvesta, Sweden
Research Site
Arvika, Sweden
Research Site
Bjuv, Sweden
Research Site
Borensberg, Sweden
Research Site
Bromma, Sweden
Research Site
Dalby, Sweden
Research Site
Eskilstuna, Sweden
Research Site
Gagnef, Sweden
Research Site
Gothenburg, Sweden
Research Site
Hisings Kärra, Sweden
Research Site
Huddinge, Sweden
Research Site
Huskvarna, Sweden
Research Site
Jönköping, Sweden
Research Site
Kalmar, Sweden
Research Site
Kungälv, Sweden
Research Site
Lerum, Sweden
Research Site
Lessebo, Sweden
Research Site
Lidköping, Sweden
Research Site
Lilla Edet, Sweden
Research Site
Linköping, Sweden
Research Site
Ludvika, Sweden
Research Site
Lyckeby, Sweden
Research Site
Malmo, Sweden
Research Site
Moheda, Sweden
Research Site
Motala, Sweden
Research Site
Örebro, Sweden
Research Site
Östersund, Sweden
Research Site
Skanör, Sweden
Research Site
Söderåkra, Sweden
Research Site
Stenungsund, Sweden
Research Site
Stocksund, Sweden
Research Site
Timrå, Sweden
Research Site
Uddevalla, Sweden
Research Site
Ulricehamn, Sweden
Research Site
Umeå, Sweden
Research Site
Uppsala, Sweden
Research Site
Vaxjo, Sweden
Research Site
Västerås, Sweden
Research Site
Västervik, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gerard Lynch
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
AstraZeneca Sweden Medical Director, MD
AstraZeneca
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans Persson, MD, PhD
Danderyd Hospital, Sweden
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bjorn Eriksson, MD
AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2006
First Posted
October 25, 2006
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 25, 2012
Results First Posted
June 18, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06