Comparison of Bystander Fatigue and CPR Quality When Using Two Different CPR Ratios.
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
STUDY OBJECTIVES The overall goal of this study is to compare bystander fatigue and CPR quality after 5 minutes of the new 30:2 versus the old 15:2 chest compression to ventilation International Resuscitation Guidelines, in a population aged 55 or greater. More specifically, we will compare each CPR ratio with regard to:
- 1.The achieved frequency and depth of chest compressions,
- 2.Participant rating of their perceived level of exertion, and
- 3.Resulting serum lactate levels in a subset of the participants.
- 4.less frequent and shallower chest compressions over the 5-minute study period;
- 5.higher rating of perceived level of exertion; and
- 6.higher serum lactate levels in a subset of participants when compared to the old 15:2 CPR ratio.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2006
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2006
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 15, 2025
CompletedApril 15, 2025
April 1, 2025
1 month
September 23, 2006
October 30, 2024
April 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CPR Quality
Number of adequate chest compressions per minute
over a 5 minute period
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Blood Pressure Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale
After 5 minutes of 15:2 CPR or 30:2 CPR
Study Arms (2)
CPR 30:2
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
CPR 15:2
ACTIVE COMPARATOR15 chest compressions to 2 ventilations
Interventions
Participants will use 2 CPR techniques with different chest compression to ventilation ratios
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female aged 55 or older
- Must score 3 or less on the validated Clinical Frailty Scale 11
- Able to follow instructions in English or French
- Able to understand and give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Musculoskeletal condition precluding the ability to kneel down and perform CPR (e.g. severe arthritis, cast, wrist sprain, recent joint surgery)
- Cardiovascular condition precluding the ability to perform a moderate effort e.g. myocardial infarction or cardiovascular procedure in the last 3 months, recurrent angina, chest pain under investigation)
- Pulmonary condition precluding the ability to perform a moderate effort (e.g. emphysema, severe asthma, pneumonia)
- Active communicable disease e.g. tuberculosis, meningitis, gastro enteritis, hepatitis A or B, herpes simplex)
- Inability to perform chest compressions at appropriate rate and depth despite positive feedback during one to two-minute practice session
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Vaillancourt C, Midzic I, Taljaard M, Chisamore B. Performer fatigue and CPR quality comparing 30:2 to 15:2 compression to ventilation ratios in older bystanders: A randomized crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2011 Jan;82(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
PMID: 20947241RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Manya Charette
- Organization
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Vaillancourt, MD, Msc,
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2006
First Posted
September 26, 2006
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
July 1, 2006
Study Completion
November 1, 2006
Last Updated
April 15, 2025
Results First Posted
April 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04