CPR Feedback Devices
TWO METHODS OF TRAINING TO IMPROVE CHEST COMPRESSION EFFECITVENESS BY MEDICAL STUDENTS AND BYSTANDERS: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to compare two methods of training in CPR, standard basic life support and CPR using CPR feedback device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 18, 2014
November 1, 2014
1 month
November 13, 2014
November 17, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effective compressions compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions
effective compressions was defined as compression with correct depth (40-50mm), correct hand position and complete decompressions
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
effective compressions ratio effective compressions [%] multiplied by flow time [%]
1 month
Flow time sum of all periods during which chest compressions were performed.
1 month
absolute hands-off time sum of all periods without chest compressions or ventilation
1 month
Compression depth compression in correct depth (40-50mm) measured by the software is connected to the manikin and computer
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Traditional learning
EXPERIMENTALchest compression group learning without CPR feedback device. After a month of quality control of chest compressions is made also without the device.
Experimental learning
EXPERIMENTALTraining is done using TrueCPR feedback device. After a month of quality control of chest compressions is made without the device. To do this will be indicated on the impact of the use of feedback devices for improving the effectiveness of training in CPR.
Interventions
basic life support without any feedback device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Give voluntary consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Not meet the above criteria
- Wrist or low back diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Warsaw, Masovia, 03-122, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lukasz Szarpak
Institute of Cardiology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lukasz Szarpak
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2014
First Posted
November 18, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 18, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11