Effectiveness of Video-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Is Video-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation More Effective Than Telephone-assisted or Not-instructed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Laypeople? - a Randomized Controlled Simulation Study
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sudden cardiac arrest is a major public health problem worldwide and it is one of the leading causes of death in industrialized countries. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatchers play an important role to recognize cardiac arrest and give help to the lay first responder via telephone CPR (T-CPR) which improves survival rates. The current technology allows the live video connection between the scene and the dispatcher which provides the opportunity for video-assisted CPR (V-CPR) via the bystander smartphone. Effectiveness of V-CPR has only been investigated to a limited extent. Comparing effectiveness of V-CPR (effectiveness of chest compression, time parameters eg. time to first chest compression) to T-CPR and non-instructed CPR can be useful to implement V-CPR technology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 6, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 23, 2023
CompletedJanuary 25, 2023
January 1, 2023
2 months
November 14, 2022
January 23, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quality of chest compressions (depth of chest compressions).
Chest compression depth will be evaluated by a manikin connected to a CPR software.
During procedure
Quality of chest compressions (rate of chest compressions).
Chest compression rate will be evaluated by a manikin connected to a CPR software.
During procedure
Quality of chest compressions (hand position of chest compressions).
Hand position during chest compression will be evaluated by observation.
During procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time factors of CPR
During procedure
Attitude of bystanders.
Immediately after the CPR procedure (within 15 minutes)
Study Arms (3)
T-CPR
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants perform telephone-assisted CPR based on the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2021 guidelines.
V-CPR
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform video-assisted CPR based on the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2021 guidelines.
Unassisted CPR
NO INTERVENTIONCPR without dispatcher instructions.
Interventions
Participants in V-CPR group get video-based (vocal and visual) instructions from the dispatcher.
Participants in T-CPR group get voice-based (vocal) instructions from the dispatcher.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy volunteer
You may not qualify if:
- healthcare professionals (paramedics, nurses, etc.)
- pregnant women
- people with cardio-pulmonary and musculoskeletal diseases or any other impairment that would risk harm for the volunteer while performing CPR for 2 minutes
- psychological disabilities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pécs
Pécs, 7621, Hungary
Related Publications (1)
Szollosi V, Horvath B, Nemeth D, Banfai-Csonka H, Betlehem J, Banfai B. A randomized controlled simulation trial comparing video-assisted with telephone-assisted and unassisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by non-healthcare university students. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 11;13(1):14925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42131-z.
PMID: 37696968DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bálint Bánfai, PhD
University of Pecs
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- senior lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2022
First Posted
December 6, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
January 20, 2023
Study Completion
January 23, 2023
Last Updated
January 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share