Sequential vs Upfront Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Large Resectable or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
INTENS
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
24
Brief Summary
2 different treatment schedules may be used for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and taxotere. The most optimal sequence- concurrent or sequential- is however unclear. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with AC followed by T(adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, taxotere) versus TAC ( with upfront T) in patient with large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 breast-cancer
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedMarch 18, 2010
March 1, 2010
3.2 years
April 14, 2006
March 17, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
The delivered chemotherapy dose and dose-intensity of both chemotherapy regimens
The tolerability (grade 3/4 CTC toxicities) of both chemotherapy regimens.
The clinical responses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated to pathological responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
The value of breast MRI in evaluating response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared to clinical palpation, ultrasound techniques and histo-pathological outcome.
The false-negative rate of the sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALCycles 1-4 q 3 weeks: doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide Cycles 5-8 q 3 weeks: docetaxel
B
EXPERIMENTALCycles 1-6 q 3 weeks: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and docetaxel
Interventions
doxorubicin (arm A:60 mg/m2) and arm B: 50 mg/m2)
Cyclophosphamide: (arm A; 6000 mg/m2) an (arm B: 500 mg/m2)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women presenting with large resectable or locally advanced breast cancer (T2 ≥3 cm, T3, or T4, and/or LN positive)
- Measurable disease (breast and/or lymph nodes)
- No prior surgery other than biopsy and no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- Age ≥18 years and age ≤70 years
- Karnofsky Performance score ≥70%
- Estrogen and/or progesterone receptor analysis performed on the primary tumour in the biopsy material
- In case the tumor is ER/PgR ³ 50% positive, (neo)adjuvant hormonal therapy in stead of chemotherapy should be considered (e.g. in TEAM II study)
- Her2/neu receptor analysis performed on the primary tumour in the biopsy material
- Adequate bone marrow function (within 14 days prior to registration): WBC ≥3.0 x 109/l, neutrophils ≥1.5 x 109/l, platelets ≥100 x 109/l
- Adequate liver function (within 4 weeks prior to start treatment): bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (UNL) range, ALAT and/or ASAT ≤2.5 x UNL, Alkaline Phosphatase ≤5 x UNL
- Adequate renal function (within 4 weeks prior to start treatment): the calculated creatinine clearance should be ≥50 mL/min
- Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
- Written informed consent according to the local Ethics Committee requirements
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with advanced pulmonary disease of any cause (oxygen dependent)- Peripheral neuropathy \> grade 2 whatever the cause
- Serious other diseases as recent myocardial infarction, clinical signs of cardiac failure or clinically significant arrythmias
- Evidence of distant metastases (M1)
- Patients with a history of breast cancer
- Patients with a history of another malignancy (except basal cell skin carcinoma and carcinoma-in-situ of the uterine cervix) within 5 years of study entry- Pregnant or lactating women, or potentially fertile women not using adequate contraception
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- Sanoficollaborator
- Amgencollaborator
Study Sites (24)
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, Netherlands
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer, Netherlands
Slingeland Hospital
Doetinchem, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
St. Anna Hospital
Geldrop, Netherlands
St. Jansdal Ziekenhuis
Harderwijk, Netherlands
Atrium Medisch Centrum
Heerlen, Netherlands
Elkerliek Ziekenhuis
Helmond, Netherlands
Spaarne Ziekenhuis
Hoofddorp, Netherlands
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
Leiden, Netherlands
Academical Hospital Maastricht (AZM)
Maastricht, Netherlands
St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Waterland Hospital
Purmerend, Netherlands
Maasland Hospital
Sittard, Netherlands
HAGA Ziekenhuis
The Hague, Netherlands
St. Elisabeth Ziekenhuis
Tilburg, Netherlands
Mesos Medisch Centrum
Utrecht, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Maxima Medisch Centrum
Veldhoven, Netherlands
Zaans Medical Centre
Zaandam, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Vriens BEPJ, Vriens IJH, Aarts MJB, van Gastel SM, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Smilde TJ, van Warmerdam LJC, van Spronsen DJ, Peer PGM, de Boer M, Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Breast Cancer Trialists' Group of the Netherlands (BOOG). Improved survival for sequentially as opposed to concurrently delivered neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;165(3):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4364-8. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
PMID: 28674765DERIVEDVriens BE, de Vries B, Lobbes MB, van Gastel SM, van den Berkmortel FW, Smilde TJ, van Warmerdam LJ, de Boer M, van Spronsen DJ, Smidt ML, Peer PG, Aarts MJ, Tjan-Heijnen VC; INTENS Study Group. Ultrasound is at least as good as magnetic resonance imaging in predicting tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;52:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
PMID: 26650831DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
V.C.G. Tjan-Heijnen
AZM Maastricht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2006
First Posted
April 17, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
March 18, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-03