Epothilone (Ixabepilone) Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
A Phase III Study of Novel Epothilone (Ixabepilone) Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and a Taxane
1 other identifier
interventional
1,221
28 countries
183
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if BMS-247550 added to the approved therapy of capecitabine (Xeloda) provides measurable clinical benefits over capecitabine alone in women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients should have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 cancer
Started Nov 2003
Typical duration for phase_3 cancer
183 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 17, 2009
CompletedNovember 2, 2020
October 1, 2020
4.3 years
May 7, 2004
May 1, 2009
October 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time in months from randomization until the date of death. For those patients who had not died, survival duration was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive. Median OS with 95% CI estimated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Method.
from date of randomization until death
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression
Response Rate (RR)
every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression
Duration of Response
every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression
Time to Response
every 6 weeks (± 3 days) from randomization while on treatment until documented progression
Treatment-Related Safety Summary
safety was assessed on a continual basis every cycle while on-treatment and every 4 weeks post treatment until toxicities resolved or were deemed irreversible.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
A
EXPERIMENTALB
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Ixabepilone lypholized powder/Diluent for solution for injection/Tablets, IV/Oral, 40 mg/m2 + Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2, Ixabepilone on Day 1 and Capecitabine twice daily Days 1-14 of 21 day cycle
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- R-Pharmlead
Study Sites (186)
Local Institution
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Local Institution
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Local Institution
Corona, California, United States
Local Institution
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Local Institution
Plantation, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Boise, Idaho, United States
Local Institution
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Local Institution
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Local Institution
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Local Institution
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Local Institution
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Local Institution
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States
Local Institution
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Local Institution
Latham, New York, United States
Local Institution
Mineola, New York, United States
Local Institution
New York, New York, United States
Local Institution
The Bronx, New York, United States
Local Institution
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Kinston, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Canton, Ohio, United States
Local Institution
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Local Institution
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Local Institution
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Local Institution
Dallas, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Local Institution
Avellaneda, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Belén de Escobar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Resistencia, Chaco Province, Argentina
Local Institution
Barrio Alto Verde, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Local Institution
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina
Local Institution
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Local Institution
Mendoza, Argentina
Local Institution
Salta, Argentina
Local Institution
Santa Fe, Argentina
Local Institution
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Local Institution
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Local Institution
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Local Institution
Woodville, South Australia, Australia
Local Institution
East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Local Institution
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Local Institution
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Local Institution
Graz, Austria
Local Institution
Vienna, Austria
Local Institution
Vöcklabruck, Austria
Local Institution
Brussels, Belgium
Local Institution
Charleroi, Belgium
Local Institution
Ghent, Belgium
Local Institution
Hasselt, Belgium
Local Institution
Kortrijk, Belgium
Local Institution
Wilrijk, Belgium
Local Institution
Centro-Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Local Institution
Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil
Local Institution
Higienopolis, São Paulo, Brazil
Local Institution
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Local Institution
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Local Institution
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Local Institution
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Local Institution
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Local Institution
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Local Institution
Dalian, Liaoning, China
Local Institution
Dilian, Liaoning, China
Local Institution
Jinan, Shandong, China
Local Institution
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Local Institution
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Local Institution
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Local Institution
Split, Croatia
Local Institution
Zagreb, Croatia
Local Institution
Brno, Czechia
Local Institution
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Local Institution
Prague, Czechia
Local Institution
Aalborg, Denmark
Local Institution
Herlev, Denmark
Local Institution
København Ø, Denmark
Local Institution
Angers, France
Local Institution
Bordeaux, France
Local Institution
Caen, France
Local Institution
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Local Institution
Colmar, France
Local Institution
Le Mans, France
Local Institution
Metz, France
Local Institution
Paris, France
Local Institution
Pierre-Bénite, France
Local Institution
Reims, France
Local Institution
Saint-Brieuc, France
Local Institution
Saint-Grégoire, France
Local Institution
Saint-Herblain, France
Local Institution
Tours, France
Local Institution
Villejuif, France
Local Institution
Berlin, Germany
Local Institution
Erlangen, Germany
Local Institution
Essen, Germany
Local Institution
Hanover, Germany
Local Institution
Karlsruhe, Germany
Local Institution
Kiel, Germany
Local Institution
Marburg, Germany
Local Institution
München, Germany
Local Institution
Rehling, Germany
Local Institution
Saarbrücken, Germany
Local Institution
Tübingen, Germany
Local Institution
Ulm, Germany
Local Institution
Wiesbaden, Germany
Local Institution
Athens, Greece
Local Institution
Crete, Greece
Local Institution
Pátrai, Greece
Local Institution
Thessaloniki, Greece
Local Institution
Wilton, Cork, Ireland
Local Institution
Cork, Ireland
Local Institution
Dublin, Ireland
Local Institution
Galway, Ireland
Local Institution
Haifa, Israel
Local Institution
Jerusalem, Israel
Local Institution
Ramat Gan, Israel
Local Institution
Tel Aviv, Israel
Local Institution
Rozzano, Milan, Italy
Local Institution
Bari, Italy
Local Institution
Florence, Italy
Local Institution
Genova, Italy
Local Institution
Milan, Italy
Local Institution
Modena, Italy
Local Institution
Perugia, Italy
Local Institution
Potenza, Italy
Local Institution
Roma, Italy
Local Institution
San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Local Institution
Sora, Italy
Local Institution
Torino, Italy
Local Institution
Arnhem, Netherlands
Local Institution
Enschede, Netherlands
Local Institution
The Hague, Netherlands
Local Institution
Zwolle, Netherlands
Local Institution
Coimbra, Portugal
Local Institution
Lisbon, Portugal
Local Institution
Kazan', Russia
Local Institution
Moscow, Russia
Local Institution
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Local Institution
Singapore, Singapore
Local Institution
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Local Institution
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Local Institution
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
Local Institution
Panorama, Western Cape, South Africa
Local Institution
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Local Institution
Incheon, South Korea
Local Institution
Seoul, South Korea
Local Institution
Terassa, Barcelona, Spain
Local Institution
Barcelona, Spain
Local Institution
Cadiz, Spain
Local Institution
Córdoba, Spain
Local Institution
Elche (Alicante), Spain
Local Institution
Jaén, Spain
Local Institution
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
Local Institution
Madrid, Spain
Local Institution
Pontevedra, Spain
Local Institution
Reus, Spain
Local Institution
Salamanca, Spain
Local Institution
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Local Institution
Seville, Spain
Local Institution
Valencia, Spain
Local Institution
Zaragoza, Spain
Local Institution
Bern, Switzerland
Local Institution
Thun, Switzerland
Local Institution
Zurich, Switzerland
Local Institution
Taipei, Taiwan
Local Institution
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Local Institution
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Local Institution
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
Local Institution
Belfast, Armagh, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Glasgow, Central, United Kingdom
Local Institution
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Shrewsbury, Shropshire, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Wedam SB, Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Kim G, Kluetz P, McKee A, Pazdur R. US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis to Assess the Impact of Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer on Clinical Trial Outcomes and Radiographic Assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6917. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
PMID: 29522361DERIVEDVahdat LT, Vrdoljak E, Gomez H, Li RK, Bosserman L, Sparano JA, Baselga J, Mukhopadhyay P, Valero V. Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in elderly patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013 Oct;4(4):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
PMID: 24472478DERIVEDJassem J, Fein L, Karwal M, Campone M, Peck R, Poulart V, Vahdat L. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients with early relapse after adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes: a pooled subset analysis of two phase III studies. Breast. 2012 Feb;21(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
PMID: 21937232DERIVEDRoche H, Conte P, Perez EA, Sparano JA, Xu B, Jassem J, Peck R, Kelleher T, Hortobagyi GN. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer patients with reduced performance status previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: a pooled analysis by performance status of efficacy and safety data from 2 phase III studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):755-65. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1251-y. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
PMID: 21128114DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director
- Organization
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2004
First Posted
May 11, 2004
Study Start
November 1, 2003
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
March 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 2, 2020
Results First Posted
August 17, 2009
Record last verified: 2020-10