Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, or Fallopian Tube Cancer
A Phase III Study of Cisplatin Plus Topotecan Followed by Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin as First Line Chemotherapy in Women With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
5 other identifiers
interventional
819
1 country
28
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating ovarian epithelial, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients who have stage IIB, stage III, or stage IV ovarian epithelial cancer , primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Aug 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_3
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 31, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 5, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2013
CompletedApril 2, 2020
March 1, 2020
6.5 years
January 4, 2002
March 31, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression free survival
Mar 2008
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Overall Survival
Dec 2012
Response Rates
March 2008
Toxic Effects
March 2008
Quality of Life
March 2008
CA125 Normalization Rates
March 2008
Study Arms (2)
Cisplatin, Topotecan, Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 1
Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 2
Interventions
Arm 1 = 4 cycles vs Arm 2 = 8 cycles AUC5 (30 mins) day 1 of 21 day cycle
4 cycles 50mg/m2 (60 mins) day 1 of 21 day cycle
Arm 1 = 4 cycles vs Arm 2 = 8 cycles 175mg/m2 (3 hours) day 1 of 21 day cycle
4 cycles .75mg/m2 (30 mins) days 1-5 of 21 day cycle
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (28)
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2, Canada
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
BCCA - Cancer Centre for the Southern Interior
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3, Canada
Lions Gate Hospital
North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 2L7, Canada
BCCA - Fraser Valley Cancer Centre
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, Canada
BCCA - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6, Canada
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9, Canada
The Moncton Hospital
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6Z8, Canada
Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2, Canada
Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, AIB 3V6, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
Northeast Cancer Center Health Sciences
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5J1, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2, Canada
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9, Canada
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3, Canada
London Regional Cancer Program
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6, Canada
Ottawa Health Research Institute - General Division
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Niagara Health System
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 7C6, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4, Canada
Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Windsor Regional Cancer Centre
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3, Canada
PEI Cancer Treatment Centre,Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 8T5, Canada
CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1, Canada
Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada
CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Hoskins PJ, Vergote I, Stuart G, et al.: A phase III trial of cisplatin plus topotecan followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard carboplatin plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in women with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) (OV.16). A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Study of the NCIC CTG, EORTC GCG, and GEICO. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-LBA5505, 2008.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Paul J. Hoskins, MD
British Columbia Cancer Agency
- STUDY CHAIR
Ignace B. Vergote, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2002
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
August 31, 2001
Primary Completion
March 5, 2008
Study Completion
January 10, 2013
Last Updated
April 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share