Standard Chemotherapy Compared With High-Dose Combination Chemotherapy and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED EVALUATION OF HIGH-INTENSITY CHEMOTHERAPY WITH PERIPHERAL BLOOD PROGENITOR SUPPORT IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK BREAST CANCER
3 other identifiers
interventional
600
2 countries
21
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow doctors to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for breast cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with that of high-dose combination chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating women who have stage II or stage IIIA breast cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Nov 1995
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
21 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 1995
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2004
CompletedNovember 6, 2013
May 1, 2007
November 1, 1999
November 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (21)
St. Vincent's Hospital
Dublin, 4, Ireland
Addenbrooke's NHS Trust
Cambridge, England, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
Cheltenham General Hospital
Cheltenham, England, GL53 7AN, United Kingdom
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter, England, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom
Royal Free Hospital
Hampstead, London, England, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
Northwick Park Hospital
Harrow, England, HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
Huddersfield Royal Infirmary
Huddersfield, West Yorks, England, HD3 3EA, United Kingdom
St. James's Hospital
Leeds, England, LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
St. George's Hospital
London, England, SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
Middlesex Hospital- Meyerstein Institute
London, England, W1N 8AA, United Kingdom
Newcastle General Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, England, NE4 6BE, United Kingdom
Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust
Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, England, PL6 8DH, United Kingdom
Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, England, S1O 2SJ, United Kingdom
Royal South Hants Hospital
Southampton, England, SO14 0YG, United Kingdom
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZN, United Kingdom
Royal Infirmary
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH3 9YW, United Kingdom
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 9NQ, United Kingdom
Beatson Oncology Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, Scotland, G4 0SF, United Kingdom
Velindre Hospital
Cardiff, Wales, CF4 7XL, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Robert C.F. Leonard, MD, BS, MB
Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
August 24, 2004
Study Start
November 1, 1995
Study Completion
June 1, 1999
Last Updated
November 6, 2013
Record last verified: 2007-05