C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion
DLT
Comparison Between C-MAC Blade D Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracic Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to know which type of laryngoscope is better for Double Lumen Tube (DLT) insertion, in participants undergoing elective thoracic surgeries. The main question aim to answer is Is C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope better than Macintosh laryngoscope for DLT insertion in term of time taking for intubation and hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy? Researchers are comparing two groups of participants
- Participants in Group A are receiving intubation from C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope.
- Participants in Group B are receiving intubations from Macintosh laryngoscope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 6, 2025
December 1, 2024
3 months
December 11, 2024
December 27, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time for intubation
1st outcome is time for intubation time for intubation will be noted during intubation of Double Lumen Tube. Time start from introduction of laryngoscope blade till three complete capnograph cycles.
During induction of anesthesia, It will take 10 to 15 minutes
Heart Rate changes to laryngoscopy
Heart Rate of a patient will be noted before induction of Anaesthesia as baseline heart rate and will be labelled as 0. Then at 1 minute, at 3 minutes and at 5 minutes after intubation, and labelled as 1 ,3 \& 5.
From enrollment till completion it will take approximately 24 hours
Blood pressure changes to laryngoscopy
Changes of blood pressure to laryngoscopy as Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DPB) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) will be noted before induction of anesthesia as baseline and labelled as 0. Then at 1 minute, 3 minutes and 5 minutes after intubation and labelled as 1, 3 and 5.
Time from enrolment to completion will be 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Video laryngoscope Group
EXPERIMENTALThose participants who will randomly assigned for intubations with C-MAC Blade D Video laryngoscope are placed in Group A
Macintosh laryngoscope Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThose participants who will randomly assigned for intubations with Macintosh Laryngoscope are placed in Group B
Interventions
C-MAC blade D Video Laryngoscope is used for difficult intubation and for better glottic view
Macintosh Laryngoscope is conventional laryngoscope used generally for intubations
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Mallampati 1 and 2.
- ASA 1 and 2.
- Patients who will be prepared for elective thoracic surgeries under general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant Patients.
- Patients with anticipated difficult airway.
- Patients with limited neck extension.
- Thyromental distance less than 6.5cm.
- BMI greater than 35. (Weight in kilogram (kg) divided by height in meters squared)
- Patients at a risk of aspiration.
- Failure to intubate the patient after 3 attempts.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Related Publications (4)
Smereka J, Ladny JR, Naylor A, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1142-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28341185BACKGROUNDKim YS, Song J, Lim BG, Lee IO, Won YJ. Different classes of videoscopes and direct laryngoscopes for double-lumen tube intubation in thoracic surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 28;15(8):e0238060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238060. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32857788BACKGROUNDLiu HH, Dong F, Liu JY, Wei JQ, Huang YK, Wang Y, Zhou T, Ma WH. The use of ETView endotracheal tube for surveillance after tube positioning in patients undergoing lobectomy, randomized trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13170. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013170.
PMID: 30544376BACKGROUNDTao D, Zhang G, Zheng X, Wang X, Gao G, Yang Z, Lin Y, Lu L. Feasibility study of intubation in lateral position using Viva-sight double-lumen tube combined with video laryngoscope in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.199. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
PMID: 37696694BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Dr Sidra Javed Consultant Anaesthetist, MBBS, FCPS, pain Fellow
CONTACT
Dr Mirza Shahzad Baig Consultant Anaesthetist, MBBS,MCPS, FCPS
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Only participant is unaware that which type of intervention is using over him.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2024
First Posted
January 6, 2025
Study Start
December 3, 2024
Primary Completion
February 28, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Patient Confidentiality: Sharing IPD could compromise patient confidentiality and anonymity Informed Consent: Participants are not providing informed consent for their data to be shared and it could raise ethical concerns.