A Comparison of the Infant Truview EVO2 Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pediatric Patients
Truview
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is intended to examine the effectiveness of a new type of laryngoscope, the Truview EVO2, in an infant patient population. They device will be tested against the current clinical standard, the Macintosh laryngoscope, in patients undergoing surgery at our hospital in terms of ease of use, view obtained of the vocal cords, and ability to place an endotracheal tube.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2008
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 15, 2017
CompletedMay 15, 2017
March 1, 2011
1.6 years
December 5, 2008
February 18, 2011
May 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification
The view obtained when we do laryngoscopy. The Comarck Lehane classification is as follows: 1) Most of the glottis is seen; 2a) Only the posterior part of the glottis is visible; 2b) The epiglottis is visible, but none of the glottis can be seen; 3) Not even the epiglottis is visible.
during laryngoscopy prior to intubation. Few minutes before intubation
Number of Intubation Attempts
Number of participants with the indicated number of intubation attempts (1/2/3)
during intubation prior to surgery
Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy
The view obtained when we do laryngoscopy. The Comarck Lehane classification is as follows: 1) Most of the glottis is seen; 2a) Only the posterior part of the glottis is visible; 2b) The epiglottis is visible, but none of the glottis can be seen; 3) Not even the epiglottis is visible.
during laryngoscopy prior to intubation (few minutes prior to intubation)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time Taken for Intubation
throughout the intubation procedure
POGO Score With 1st Laryngoscopy
Before patient is intubated (few minutes before intubation)
POGO Score With 2nd Laryngoscopy
Before patient is intubated
Study Arms (2)
Truview intubation
EXPERIMENTALReceive laryngoscopy with Truview first and is immediately followed by laryngoscopy and intubation with Macintosh
Macintosh intubation
ACTIVE COMPARATORMacintosh blade will be used first followed by laryngoscopy and intubation with the truview
Interventions
will use the Truview laryngoscope instead of the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope
Intubation using the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age less than one year
- Requiring general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation
- Weight less than 10 kg
- ASA class 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Documented difficult airway
- Facial deformities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Maria Matuszczak
- Organization
- UT Medical School, Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maria Matuszczak, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor - Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2008
First Posted
December 8, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
May 15, 2017
Results First Posted
May 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2011-03