Video Laryngoscope
6
5
5
1
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.4% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 1 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.6%
Based on 1 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Endoscopy-Assisted Tracheal Intubation Versus Conventional Tracheal Intubation for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
Pediatric Airway: Noninferiority Trial of Devices for Intubation Assessment
Comparative Study Between Combined Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet Intubation Versus Combined Video Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Intubation in a Simulated Difficult Airway
Tracheal Tube Cuff Inflation-Deflation Method for Video Assisted Laryngoscope Nasal Intubation in Adults
C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion
Comparison of Airtraq in Class 2-3 Obese and Nonobese Men During Intubation: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study