Double Lumen Tube Intubation
8
1
1
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 8 trials
100.0%
+13.4% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
33%
1 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.6%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (8)
Video-guided Versus Conventional Right-sided Double-Lumen Tubes for One-Lung Ventilation in Thoracoscopic Surgery
Hyperangulated vs Standard Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
Learning Curve Analysis of Double-Lumen Tube Placement in Anesthesiology Residents: The Impact of Prior Experience and Laryngoscope Type
Evaluation of Double Lumen Tube Intubation Difficulty With Photo-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Double-Lumen Tube Intubation in the Lateral Position Versus the Supine Position on First-Attempt Success Rate
C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion
The Pretreatment of a Left-sided Double-lumen Tube to Prevent Its Misplacement to the Right Mainstem Bronchus
The New GlideRite DLT Stylet®: An Observational Study