McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope
MGM-Eval
Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation With the McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope
2 other identifiers
interventional
158
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Videolaryngoscopes become widely used. The aim of this study is to compare McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope to conventional MacIntosh laryngoscope in patients without known risk of difficult of mask ventilation and of tracheal intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 31, 2016
October 1, 2016
1 year
November 12, 2014
October 28, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ease of tracheal intubation
Ease of intubation is measured using the Intubation Difficulty Scale (Adnet et al. Anesthesiology 1997;87(6):1290-1297)
1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Time to obtain the first capnogram (sec)
one hour
Score of Cormak and Lehane modified by Yentis
one hour
POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score
one hour
Rate of use of alternative techniques for intubation
one hour
Rate of esophageal intubation
one hour
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Macintosh laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORTracheal intubation will be performed using a Macintosh laryngoscope
McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope
EXPERIMENTALTracheal intubation will be performed using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient scheduled for a general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation
You may not qualify if:
- predictable risk of difficult mask ventilation or of difficult tracheal intubation
- necessity of a rapid sequence induction
- contra-indication to sufentanil, to propofol, or to atracurium
- ENT, thoracic surgery, or intracranial surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hopital Fochlead
Study Sites (2)
Institut Hospitalier Franco-Britannique
Levallois-Perret, Hauts de Seine, 92300, France
Hopital Foch
Suresnes, Hauts de Seine, 92151, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michel Chandon, MD
Hopital Foch
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2014
First Posted
November 18, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 31, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10