NCT06520852

Brief Summary

This research was conducted to examine the effect of students' use of AI tools while preparing patient education material on the quality, understandability and actionability of the material in terms of content. Students in the control group used auxiliary tools such as books, journals and websites while preparing patient education materials. Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 5, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 7, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 25, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Understandability of the material

    Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability.

    After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)

  • Actionability of the material

    Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials: The tool consists of a total of 26 items, 19 items evaluating the understandability of the materials and 7 items evaluating their actionability. PEMAT scores materials from 0 to 100 points for understandability and actionability.

    After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)

  • Quality of the material

    Global Quality Scale : According to this scale, the quality of the training materials was evaluated on a 5-point scale (1: poor quality, 2: low quality - limited use, 3: somewhat useful, 4: useful, 5: useful-excellent quality).

    After the students have completed the materials (5 days later)

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials

Other: Group using artificial intelligence tools in addition to traditional tools in preparing educational materials

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Group using traditional tools in preparing educational materials

Interventions

Students in the intervention group used AI tools in addition to tools such as books, journals, and websites.

Also known as: artificial intelligence
Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 46 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • agreeing to participate in the study,
  • taking the Fundamentals of Nursing II course for the first time,
  • not working as a nurse in a hospital or any health institution.

You may not qualify if:

  • not agreeing to participate in the study
  • having prepared patient education materials before
  • repeating the Fundamentals of Nursing II course
  • not having internet access
  • not having a computer or smartphone.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sevda Korkut

Talas, Kayseri, 0(553) 310 49 51, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Artificial Intelligence

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AlgorithmsMathematical Concepts

Study Officials

  • SEVDA KORKUT

    TC Erciyes University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2024

First Posted

July 25, 2024

Study Start

February 5, 2024

Primary Completion

May 31, 2024

Study Completion

June 7, 2024

Last Updated

July 25, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations