NCT06223373

Brief Summary

Atrophy and weakness of the shoulder are a common problem following treatment of a number of shoulder and elbow pathologies. Even with relatively short periods of reduced activity, the magnitude of muscle loss can be quite substantial.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 16, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 13, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 18, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 18, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 4, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 4, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 16, 2024

Results QC Date

September 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

October 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Upper extremity injuriesmuscle atrophytendinopathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (39)

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: External Rotation (ER) Peak Torque Average (60 Degrees/Second)

    measuring shoulder strength in injured and non-injured arms for both study groups using a Biodex testing machine - Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Baseline

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: External Rotation (ER) Peak Torque Average (60 Degrees/Second)

    measuring shoulder strength in injured and non-injured arms for both study groups using a Biodex testing machine - Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Week 6

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: External Rotation (ER) Peak Torque Average (180 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Baseline

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: External Rotation (ER) Peak Torque Average (180 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Week 6

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: External Rotation (ER) Peak Torque Average (300 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Baseline

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: External Rotation (ER) Peak Torque Average (300 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Week 6

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: Internal Rotation (IR) Peak Torque Average (60 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Baseline

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: Internal Rotation (IR) Peak Torque Average (60 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Week 6

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: Internal Rotation (IR) Peak Torque Average (180 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Baseline

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: Internal Rotation (IR) Peak Torque Average (180 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Week 6

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: Internal Rotation (IR) Peak Torque Average (300 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Baseline

  • Shoulder Muscle Strength Analysis: Internal Rotation (IR) Peak Torque Average (300 Degrees/Second)

    Low Score indicates low torque/strength, high score indicates high torque/strength

    Week 6

  • Rotator Cuff Muscle Cross Sectional Area (CSA) Measurement: Supraspinatus

    Ultrasound will be used to quantify the changes in rotator cuff muscle and distal biceps cross-sectional area before and after therapy. The same multifrequency linear probe (7.5-9.0 MHz, Elegra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) will be used throughout the study.

    Baseline

  • Rotator Cuff Muscle Cross Sectional Area (CSA) Measurement: Supraspinatus

    Ultrasound will be used to quantify the changes in rotator cuff muscle and distal biceps cross-sectional area before and after therapy. The same multifrequency linear probe (7.5-9.0 MHz, Elegra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) will be used throughout the study.

    Week 3

  • Rotator Cuff Muscle Cross Sectional Area (CSA) Measurement: Supraspinatus

    Ultrasound will be used to quantify the changes in rotator cuff muscle and distal biceps cross-sectional area before and after therapy. The same multifrequency linear probe (7.5-9.0 MHz, Elegra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) will be used throughout the study.

    Week 6

  • Rotator Cuff Muscle Cross Sectional Area (CSA) Measurement: Infraspinatus

    Ultrasound will be used to quantify the changes in rotator cuff muscle and distal biceps cross-sectional area before and after therapy. The same multifrequency linear probe (7.5-9.0 MHz, Elegra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) will be used throughout the study.

    Baseline

  • Rotator Cuff Muscle Cross Sectional Area (CSA) Measurement: Infraspinatus

    Ultrasound will be used to quantify the changes in rotator cuff muscle and distal biceps cross-sectional area before and after therapy. The same multifrequency linear probe (7.5-9.0 MHz, Elegra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) will be used throughout the study.

    Week 3

  • Rotator Cuff Muscle Cross Sectional Area (CSA) Measurement: Infraspinatus

    Ultrasound will be used to quantify the changes in rotator cuff muscle and distal biceps cross-sectional area before and after therapy. The same multifrequency linear probe (7.5-9.0 MHz, Elegra; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) will be used throughout the study.

    Week 6

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for PAIN - Baseline Scores

    Patients will receive questionnaires (VAS) at Baseline, Week 6, 6 and 12 months after completing rehabilitation - The VAS score can be interpreted into categories of pain or symptom intensity: 0-4 mm: No pain. 5-44 mm: Mild pain. 45-74 mm: Moderate pain. 75-100 mm: Severe pain.

    Baseline

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for PAIN - Week 6 Scores

    Patients will receive questionnaires (VAS) at Baseline, Week 6, 6 and 12 months after completing rehabilitation - The VAS score can be interpreted into categories of pain or symptom intensity: 0-4 mm: No pain. 5-44 mm: Mild pain. 45-74 mm: Moderate pain. 75-100 mm: Severe pain.

    Week 6

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for PAIN - Month 6 Scores

    Patients will receive questionnaires (VAS) at Baseline, Week 6, 6 and 12 months after completing rehabilitation - The VAS score can be interpreted into categories of pain or symptom intensity: 0-4 mm: No pain. 5-44 mm: Mild pain. 45-74 mm: Moderate pain. 75-100 mm: Severe pain.

    Month 6

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for PAIN - Month 12 Scores

    Patients will receive questionnaires (VAS) at Baseline, Week 6, 6 and 12 months after completing rehabilitation - The VAS score can be interpreted into categories of pain or symptom intensity: 0-4 mm: No pain. 5-44 mm: Mild pain. 45-74 mm: Moderate pain. 75-100 mm: Severe pain.

    Month 12

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Baseline Scores

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score is a patient-completed assessment for shoulder function and pain, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function. Scoring involves a 50-point pain component derived from a visual analog scale (VAS), and a 50-point functional component from 10 activities of daily living questions, which are then weighted and added for the final score

    Baseline

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Week 6 Scores

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score is a patient-completed assessment for shoulder function and pain, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function. Scoring involves a 50-point pain component derived from a visual analog scale (VAS), and a 50-point functional component from 10 activities of daily living questions, which are then weighted and added for the final score

    Week 6

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Month 6 Scores

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score is a patient-completed assessment for shoulder function and pain, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function. Scoring involves a 50-point pain component derived from a visual analog scale (VAS), and a 50-point functional component from 10 activities of daily living questions, which are then weighted and added for the final score

    Month 6

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Month 12 Scores

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score is a patient-completed assessment for shoulder function and pain, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function. Scoring involves a 50-point pain component derived from a visual analog scale (VAS), and a 50-point functional component from 10 activities of daily living questions, which are then weighted and added for the final score

    Month 12

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Scale (DASH) Baseline Scores

    The DASH score for patients ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no disability and 100 indicating the greatest possible functional impairment of the upper extremity. Patients answer a 30-item questionnaire on a five-point scale (0-4 or 0-5 depending on the scale used), rating their ability to perform tasks and their symptoms. The sum of the raw scores is then transformed into the final 0-100 DASH score

    Baseline

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Scale (DASH) Week 6 Scores

    The DASH score for patients ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no disability and 100 indicating the greatest possible functional impairment of the upper extremity. Patients answer a 30-item questionnaire on a five-point scale (0-4 or 0-5 depending on the scale used), rating their ability to perform tasks and their symptoms. The sum of the raw scores is then transformed into the final 0-100 DASH score

    Week 6

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Scale (DASH) Month 6 Scores

    The DASH score for patients ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no disability and 100 indicating the greatest possible functional impairment of the upper extremity. Patients answer a 30-item questionnaire on a five-point scale (0-4 or 0-5 depending on the scale used), rating their ability to perform tasks and their symptoms. The sum of the raw scores is then transformed into the final 0-100 DASH score

    Month 6

  • Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Scale (DASH) Month 12 Scores

    The DASH score for patients ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no disability and 100 indicating the greatest possible functional impairment of the upper extremity. Patients answer a 30-item questionnaire on a five-point scale (0-4 or 0-5 depending on the scale used), rating their ability to perform tasks and their symptoms. The sum of the raw scores is then transformed into the final 0-100 DASH score

    Month 12

  • GH Levels - Baseline

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Baseline

  • GH Levels - Week 3

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Week 3

  • GH Levels - Week 6

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Week 6

  • IGF-1 Levels - Baseline

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Baseline

  • IGF-1 Levels - Week 3

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Week 3

  • IGF-1 Levels - Week 6

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Week 6

  • IL-6 Levels - Baseline

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Baseline

  • IL-6 Levels - Week 3

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Week 3

  • IL-6 Levels - Week 6

    Patients will receive the blood draws in the physical therapy clinic - ELISA will be used to quantify plasma levels

    Week 6

Study Arms (2)

Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)

EXPERIMENTAL

Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) pressurized per standard protocols in addition to our institutional rehabilitation protocol

Device: Blood Flow Restriction

"sham" Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)

SHAM COMPARATOR

rehabilitation using "sham BFR" as well as our institutional rehabilitation protocol

Device: "sham" Blood Flow Restriction

Interventions

In the BFR group, the tourniquet will be pressurized to 50% limb occlusion pressure (LOP), which is the pressure necessary for occluding 50% of arterial limb flow in the upper extremity.

Also known as: BFR
Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)

In the sham BFR group, the tourniquet will be pressurized to 0% occlusion pressure, while maintaining enough pressure to keep the tourniquet in place.

"sham" Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • injured patient with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) consistent with a formal diagnosis of non-operative rotator cuff and/or biceps tendinopathy
  • no prior upper extremity ipsilateral procedures or history of deep vein thrombosis
  • those willing to be part of the study

You may not qualify if:

  • patients younger than 18 or older than 55 years of age
  • a history of revision surgery or prior ipsilateral upper extremity surgery
  • concomitant ligamentous, tendinous, or cartilage injury that would alter postoperative rehabilitation protocol
  • inability to comply with the proposed follow-up clinic visits
  • patients lacking decisional capacity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder InjuriesMuscular AtrophyTendinopathy

Interventions

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesTendon Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy Modalities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kristen Faith Nicholson, PhD
Organization
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study Officials

  • Kristen Nicholson, MD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: patients who will be recruited into randomized into 1 of 2 study arms: 1) those undergoing rehabilitation using Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) pressurized per standard protocols in addition to our institutional rehabilitation protocol or 2) those undergoing rehabilitation using "sham BFR" as well as our institutional rehabilitation protocol.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2024

First Posted

January 25, 2024

Study Start

April 13, 2024

Primary Completion

October 18, 2024

Study Completion

October 18, 2024

Last Updated

November 4, 2025

Results First Posted

November 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations