Efficacy of Nerve Blockade Performed Prior to Surgical Intervention Versus Following Surgical Intervention
Randomized Prospective Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Blockade Performed Prior to Surgical Intervention Versus Following Surgical Shoulder Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nerve blocks, or pain medication injected next to the nerve while patients are asleep, are commonly used for pain management after shoulder surgery and are considered highly effective in decreasing post-operative pain. There are several different ways to give a nerve block. All are effective and safe. The purpose of this research is to determine if one of the available ways to give a nerve block is more effective than the others.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2025
CompletedApril 2, 2024
April 1, 2024
12.2 years
January 26, 2016
April 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Efficacy of Nerve Blockades
The primary outcome will be the worst pain score observed in the PACU using 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) verbal Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain by the study staff during the first post-operative hour.
60 minutes
Study Arms (4)
Preemptive Interscalene Block - Single Shot
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostoperative Interscalene Block - Single Shot
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreemptive Interscalene Block - Catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostoperative Interscalene Block - Catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the induction of anesthesia, but prior to the start of surgery. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the completion of surgery with the patient still under general anesthesia. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. A continuous peripheral nerve catheter will then be placed under ultrasound-guidance for continuous infusion postoperatively. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the induction of anesthesia, but prior to the start of surgery. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Interscalene brachial plexus blockade will be performed by the anesthesia team under ultrasound-guidance utilizing 1 ml/kg (to a maximum volume of 20 mls) of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine. A continuous peripheral nerve catheter will then be placed under ultrasound-guidance for continuous infusion postoperatively. Regional anesthesia will be performed following the completion of surgery with the patient still under general anesthesia. Anesthesia team members determined to be proficient in regional blockade, having performed a minimum of ten successful interscalene brachial plexus blocks previously, will be performing the regional blockade.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is male or female;
- The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups;
- The subject is age 10 years to 21 years (inclusive);
- The subject is scheduled for the following
- Unilateral shoulder repair under general anesthesia on an out- patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
- Agreement of the surgeon for subject participation in study.
- The subject or legally authorized representative has consented to an intra- scalene block for the procedure and the consent for the block has been obtained by an clinician (MD, DO, CRNA or APN) authorized to obtain consent who is independent of the study team
- The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II;
- The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
- The subject is ASA classification \> II;
- The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics;
- The subject receives sedation preoperatively;
- The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent;
- The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study, including but not limited preexisting neuropathy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
Related Publications (6)
Katz J, Clarke H, Seltzer Z. Review article: Preventive analgesia: quo vadimus? Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1242-53. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c9a59. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
PMID: 21965352BACKGROUNDLavand'homme P. From preemptive to preventive analgesia: time to reconsider the role of perioperative peripheral nerve blocks? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):4-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820305b8. No abstract available.
PMID: 21455081BACKGROUNDMisamore G, Webb B, McMurray S, Sallay P. A prospective analysis of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed under general anesthesia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.043. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
PMID: 20708419BACKGROUNDFredrickson MJ, Ball CM, Dalgleish AJ. Analgesic effectiveness of a continuous versus single-injection interscalene block for minor arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c771bd.
PMID: 20048655BACKGROUNDHadzic A, New York School of Regional Anesthesia: Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007
BACKGROUNDAngelo RL. Controversies in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: arthroscopic versus open bankart repair, thermal treatment of capsular tissue, acromioplasties--are they necessary? Arthroscopy. 2003 Dec;19 Suppl 1:224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.005. No abstract available.
PMID: 14673442BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Mecoli, MD
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2016
First Posted
January 28, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 31, 2025
Study Completion
March 31, 2025
Last Updated
April 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04