Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Carotid Arteries in Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
1 other identifier
observational
536
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The final approach adopted in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) is to minimize the time between chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pulse and rhythm checks are recommended between chest compressions and it is stated that this period should not exceed 10 seconds. All guidelines also state that in cases of low cardiac output or low blood pressure, even if electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythms can be obtained, pulse checks may still fail and an arterial pulse may not be felt during chest compressions. This difficulty in sensing the arterial pulse causes delays in the decision of cardiac arrest in the patient. For this reason, there are cases of cardiac arrest in which the initiation of CPR is delayed or not started at all. The most common method for checking the pulse is manual palpation. However, since it is an operator-dependent method, it is affected by the experience of the healthcare personnel, the vital values of the patient, and anatomical differences. Therefore, more objective criteria are required to detect a pulse. A clinical study of the reliability of pulse checks showed that most healthcare professionals are unable to detect the presence or absence of a pulse. Another study showed that pulse alone is not sufficient to initiate CPR, and 50% of decisions to initiate CPR based on heart rate are incorrect. Therefore, more objective criteria have been sought to detect the presence of a pulse. For this purpose, evaluations were made regarding the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac echo, and organized rhythm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2022
CompletedSeptember 22, 2023
September 1, 2023
9 months
September 17, 2022
September 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Carotid artery pulse control result using manual and USG in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Our aim is to compare the USG and manual methods in evaluating the presence of a pulse during CPR and to determine which method gives the most appropriate time and accuracy.
2 minute
Interventions
pulse checks during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Eligibility Criteria
patients over 18 years old
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients (over 18 years of age) with in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with traumatic arrest
- Conditions affecting carotid pulse palpation and/or USG application (patients with a history of carotid stenosis or dissection, patients undergoing neck surgery, patients with neck abscess hematoma)
- Pregnant arrest patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IKCU, Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Acil Tıp
Izmir, 35360, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2022
First Posted
September 27, 2022
Study Start
December 25, 2021
Primary Completion
September 15, 2022
Study Completion
September 16, 2022
Last Updated
September 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
All data and statistical analyzes will be shared with academics and official institutions requesting the patient's names, provided that they remain confidential, after the permission of the institution.