Immunogenicity Trial of 3 Influenza Vaccines
Investigation and Comparison of the Antibody Response Initiated by Recombinant, Cell-Based and Egg-Based Influenza Vaccines
1 other identifier
interventional
366
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective randomised trial of 3 influenza vaccine formulations with different manufacturing processes: 1) egg-grown (QIV-E); 2) cell-grown (QIV-C); and 3) recombinant protein (QIV-R). The main objective is to compare the antibody responses following influenza vaccination among these 3 vaccines to determine whether recombinant vaccines offer superior protection over standard egg or cell-based formulations. The attenuating effects of prior vaccination on vaccine immunogenicity will also be evaluated. Hypothesis: Vaccination with recombinant vaccine results in better antibody responses, particularly against A(H3N2) viruses, than either standard egg-grown vaccines or cell-grown vaccines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 29, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 6, 2024
CompletedOctober 31, 2025
October 1, 2024
7 months
July 12, 2022
October 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Antibody titres against the 4 vaccine antigens
Post-vaccination geometric mean titre in each vaccination group as measured by the haemagglutination inhibition assay, adjusted for vaccination history and baseline titre.
Day 0, 14, 150, 330
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pre- to post-vaccination antibody titre ratio between vaccination groups
Day 0, 14, 150, 330
Range of influenza A(H3N2) strains recognized by the antibodies
Day 0, 14, 150, 330
Attenuating effects of prior vaccination on antibody titres
Day 0, 14, 150, 330
Attenuating effects of prior vaccination on vaccine immunogenicity
Day 0, 14, 150, 330
Long-term humoral immunity
Day 0, 14, 150, 330
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Frequently vaccinated Group 1: QIV-R
EXPERIMENTALFrequently vaccinated participants (3 or more influenza vaccinations during the preceding 5 years) received a 0.5mL dose of Flublok Quadrivalent vaccine, intra-muscularly, at Day 0.
Frequently vaccinated Group 2: QIV-E
EXPERIMENTALFrequently vaccinated participants (3 or more influenza vaccinations during the preceding 5 years) received a 0.5mL dose of Fluarix Quadrivalent vaccine, intra-muscularly, at Day 0.
Frequently vaccinated Group 3: QIV-C
EXPERIMENTALFrequently vaccinated participants (3 or more influenza vaccinations during the preceding 5 years) received a 0.5mL dose of Flucelvax Quadrivalent vaccine, intra-muscularly, at Day 0.
Infrequently vaccinated Group 4: QIV-R
EXPERIMENTALInfrequently vaccinated participants (0 or 1 influenza vaccination during the preceding 5 years) received a 0.5mL dose of Flublok Quadrivalent vaccine, intra-muscularly, at Day 0.
Infrequently vaccinated Group 5: QIV-E
EXPERIMENTALInfrequently vaccinated participants (0 or 1 influenza vaccination during the preceding 5 years) received a 0.5mL dose of Fluarix Quadrivalent vaccine, intra-muscularly, at Day 0.
Infrequently vaccinated Group 6: QIV-C
EXPERIMENTALInfrequently vaccinated participants (0 or 1 influenza vaccination during the preceding 5 years) received a 0.5mL dose of Flucelvax Quadrivalent vaccine, intra-muscularly, at Day 0.
Interventions
Pharmaceutical form: Suspension for injection Route of administration: Intramuscular
Pharmaceutical form: Suspension for injection Route of administration: Intramuscular
Pharmaceutical form: Suspension for injection Route of administration: Intramuscular
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to provide informed consent
- Willing and able to provide 4 blood samples at D0, 14, 150 and 330 post-vaccination
- Has not received influenza vaccine for at least 6 months
- Willing to provide current mobile phone number for SMS reminders
You may not qualify if:
- Known contraindication(s) for QIV (e.g. hypersensitivity to vaccine component (including eggs)).
- Recently (last 7 days) or currently ill or has a fever above 38 degrees celsius
- Cannot recall if they were vaccinated against influenza during more or less than two of the preceding five years. Vaccinated during two of the preceding five years.
- Hypogammaglobulinaemia on immunoglobulin replacement
- Undergoing immunosuppressive therapies including corticosteroids
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tan Tock Seng Hospitallead
- A*Starcollaborator
- University of Melbournecollaborator
- Sanoficollaborator
Study Sites (1)
National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID)
Singapore, Singapore, 308442, Singapore
Related Publications (2)
Gouma S, Zost SJ, Parkhouse K, Branche A, Topham DJ, Cobey S, Hensley SE. Comparison of Human H3N2 Antibody Responses Elicited by Egg-Based, Cell-Based, and Recombinant Protein-Based Influenza Vaccines During the 2017-2018 Season. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1447-1453. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz996.
PMID: 31598646BACKGROUNDWang W, Alvarado-Facundo E, Vassell R, Collins L, Colombo RE, Ganesan A, Geaney C, Hrncir D, Lalani T, Markelz AE, Maves RC, McClenathan B, Mende K, Richard SA, Schofield C, Seshadri S, Spooner C, Utz GC, Warkentien TE, Levine M, Coles CL, Burgess TH, Eichelberger M, Weiss CD. Comparison of A(H3N2) Neutralizing Antibody Responses Elicited by 2018-2019 Season Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccines Derived from Eggs, Cells, and Recombinant Hemagglutinin. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4312-e4320. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1352.
PMID: 32898271BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barnaby Young, Dr
National Centre for Infectious Diseases
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Head of Singapore Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2022
First Posted
July 29, 2022
Study Start
September 29, 2022
Primary Completion
April 14, 2023
Study Completion
February 6, 2024
Last Updated
October 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- After study publication.
- Access Criteria
- All researchers.
De-identified individual participant data and data dictionary