Physicians Performance After Night Shifts
URGENCE24
Performance of Emergency Physicians in the Management of Critical Situations Twenty-four Hours After the End of a Night Shift
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emergency medicine is one of the professional activities integrating a night activity into working time. Concerns about the sleep deprivation that this activity generates have been growing for the past thirty years. However, at present, the pace - duration and repetition - of this activity does not yet seem to be optimized, and therefore continues to be the subject of questions in terms of safety of care and quality of life at work. One of the peculiarities of emergency medicine is that doctors have to work in a crisis situation. A situation is qualified as critical for a patient when his state of health is unstable, and with an evolution which can be rapidly pejorative. Crisis situations are at the heart of the emergency room profession, and due to their potential seriousness for the patients, it must be managed in all circumstances. To cope with a crisis situation, a doctor needs to be efficient. However, performance calls for two types of skills: technical skills on one hand, and non-technical skills on the other. This study therefore aims to answer the following question: are the non-technical skills of emergency physicians in the management of a crisis situation affected twenty-four hours after the end of a night shift? The study assesses the performance of emergency physicians via complex simulations at two time frames : 24h after a night shift (the post recovery performance simulation) and another time were the participant did not have night shifts in less than 3 nights (usual performance simulation).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 30, 2024
January 1, 2024
1.9 years
January 11, 2022
January 29, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
non-technical efficiency via the Ottawa GRS
Overall non-technical skill score assessed using the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). The Ottawa GRS scale assesses the following five criteria: * leadership skills * situational awareness * communication skills * problem solving * resource management For each of the criteria, a score between 1 and 7 is attributed. The scoring is made as follows: a score of 1 corresponds to a novice performance, a score of 3 corresponds to a performance of a novice with experience in Crisis Resource Management (CRM) and resuscitation, a score of 5 corresponds to the performance of a physician with sufficient experience in CRM and resuscitation to properly manage a crisis situation, finally a score of 7 corresponds to the performance of a physician expert in CRM and resuscitation. An average score of the five scores is taken to obtain an overall proficiency score, also out of 7, which will be used to compare Post Recovery Performance and Usual Performance
24 hours after a night shift
non-technical efficiency via the Ottawa GRS
Overall non-technical skill score assessed using the Ottawa Crisis Resource Management Global Rating Scale (Ottawa GRS). The Ottawa GRS scale assesses the following five criteria: * leadership skills * situational awareness * communication skills * problem solving * resource management For each of the criteria, a score between 1 and 7 is attributed. The scoring is made as follows: a score of 1 corresponds to a performance judged to be that of a novice, a score of 3 corresponds to a performance of a novice with experience in CRM and resuscitation, a score of 5 corresponds to the performance of a physician with sufficient experience in CRM and resuscitation to properly manage a crisis situation, finally a score of 7 corresponds to the performance of a physician expert in CRM and resuscitation. An average score of the five scores is taken to obtain an overall proficiency score, also out of 7, which will be used to compare Post Recovery Performance and Usual Performance
after a minimum of 3 nights free of night work
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Physiologic stress
24 hours after a night shift
Physiologic stress
after a minimum of 3 nights free of night work
Study Arms (1)
Emergency physicians
EXPERIMENTALEach participant will have to carry out two simulation sessions. The first simulation will correspond to the "usual" evaluation, that is to say it will take place on a day that will not be preceded by night duty during the three previous nights. The second simulation will correspond to the assessment twenty-four hours after the end of a call, in the "post-recovery" period. The participant must therefore have performed a night shift the day before the day when the simulation takes place. This call must have a minimum duration of twelve hours on night shifts.
Interventions
Each simulation will focus on a trauma case deemed to be complex, that is to say one involving difficult decision-making. Each simulation session lasts approximately thirty minutes. It includes a time to complete the questionnaires necessary for carrying out the study, before and / or after the simulated practice depending on the type of questionnaire, a brief briefing on the simulation scenario, and the time for the simulated practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be an emergency doctor with an emergency medicine capacity,
- work full time in the emergency medicine center of the Toulouse University Hospital
- on call in at least one of the emergency reception services of the Toulouse University Hospital
- to have given his non-opposition to participate and his authorization of right to his image and his voice within the framework of the research
You may not qualify if:
- non-emergency doctor
- emergency doctor not on call in at least one of the emergency services of the Toulouse University Hospital
- professional with a declared personal or professional conflict with one of the members of the group
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles-Henri HOUZE-CERFON, MD
University Hospital, Toulouse
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The time frame of the simulation (post recovery or usual) will be unknown to the evaluator
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2022
First Posted
February 22, 2022
Study Start
January 16, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share