NCT05211466

Brief Summary

Digital healthcare has developed rapidly to meet demands for accessible healthcare, streamline care and meet future challenges with increasing healthcare needs and reduced labour force in Sweden. Developers and stakeholders in Sweden want to exchange the praxis of phone triage to digital or semi-digital triaging tools, to relieve staff's workload and utilize better resource use that would benefit all patient groups. However, previous studies have showed demographic differences in utilization rate and an increase of simpler care matters when digital healthcare options are offered. Also, little is known of medical accuracy of digital triage tools and of the work environment in digital healthcare. More research is needed on this, as well as on care consumption, care quality and of patients' experiences of digital healthcare. The overall aim of the research project is to study a new digital healthcare platform being introduced in 2021/2022 in the County of Gävleborg, Sweden. The studies will focus on care quality and patient safety as well as explore the digital work environment and staff well-being in the digital healthcare platform. Data will be collected before and after the introduction of the digital healthcare platform, using register data and questionnaires. The data from the two time periods will be analyzed with descriptive and inference statistics, to explore if the digital healthcare platform has brought differences on group levels in staff estimates of care quality and patient safety as well as in work environment aspects such as the staffs' well-being.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,012

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2022

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 17, 2022

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2022

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 12, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

January 4, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

TelemedicineeHealthTelecareTelehealthHITcare qualitywork environment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Staff-reported work environment in digital healthcare compared to traditional healthcare work.

    Questions on work environment will be asked through a survey. The survey contains questions from the following questionnaires: Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (SOPS®) and Staff Satisfaction with Care (SSC). SCORE: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on patient safety, working climate and personal growth, with some items reversed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome in factors on workload, burnout and stress. COPSOQ: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on stress and emotional demands, but a worse outcome in factors on workplace community and involvement, with one item reversed. SOPS Hospital Survey: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. SSC: Values between 1-7. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Baseline measure during January - April 2022.

  • Staff-reported well-being in digital healthcare compared to traditional healthcare work.

    Questions on well-being will be asked through a survey. The survey contains questions from the following questionnaires: Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (SOPS®) and Staff Satisfaction with Care (SSC). SCORE: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on patient safety, working climate and personal growth, with some items reversed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome in factors on workload, burnout and stress. COPSOQ: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on stress and emotional demands, but a worse outcome in factors on workplace community and involvement, with one item reversed. SOPS Hospital Survey: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. SSC: Values between 1-7. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Baseline measure during January - April 2022.

  • Staff-reported quality of care given through a digital platform compared to traditional healthcare.

    Questions on quality of care will be asked through a survey. The survey contains questions from the following questionnaires: Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (SOPS®) and Staff Satisfaction with Care (SSC). SCORE: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on patient safety, working climate and personal growth, with some items reversed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome in factors on workload, burnout and stress. COPSOQ: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on stress and emotional demands, but a worse outcome in factors on workplace community and involvement, with one item reversed. SOPS Hospital Survey: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. SSC: Values between 1-7. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Baseline measure during January - April 2022.

  • Staff-reported work environment in digital healthcare compared to traditional healthcare work.

    Questions on work environment will be asked through a survey. The survey contains questions from the following questionnaires: Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (SOPS®) and Staff Satisfaction with Care (SSC). Comparisons will be made between time and groups. SCORE: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on patient safety, working climate and personal growth with some items reversed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome in factors on workload, burnout and stress. COPSOQ: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on stress and emotional demands, but a worse outcome in factors on workplace community and involvement with one item reversed. SOPS Hospital Survey: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. SSC: Values between 1-7. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measures will be made August to December 2024.

  • Staff-reported well-being in digital healthcare compared to traditional healthcare work.

    Questions on well-being will be asked through a survey. The survey contains questions from the following questionnaires: Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (SOPS®) and Staff Satisfaction with Care (SSC). Comparisons will be made between time and groups. SCORE: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on patient safety, working climate and personal growth, with some items reversed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome in factors on workload, burnout and stress. COPSOQ: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on stress and emotional demands, but a worse outcome in factors on workplace community and involvement, with one item reversed. SOPS Hospital Survey: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. SSC: Values between 1-7. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measures will be made August to December 2024.

  • Staff-reported quality of care given through a digital platform compared to traditional health care.

    Questions on quality of care will be asked through a survey. The survey contains questions from the following questionnaires: Safety, Communication, Operational Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ Hospital Survey (SOPS®) and Staff Satisfaction with Care (SSC). Comparisons will be made between time and groups. SCORE: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on patient safety, working climate and personal growth, with some items reversed. Higher scores mean a worse outcome in factors on workload, burnout and stress. COPSOQ: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a better outcome in factors on stress and emotional demands, but a worse outcome in factors on workplace community and involvement, with one item reversed. SOPS Hospital Survey: Values between 1-5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. SSC: Values between 1-7. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measures will be made August to December 2024.

Study Arms (2)

Digital care staff

Staff working most of their time (20% or more) with the digital healthcare platform.

Other: Digital healthcare platform

Traditional care staff

Staff working traditionally, using the digital healthcare platform to a very little extent.

Interventions

In this specific digital healthcare platform, patients can enter symptoms and get an initial digital triage by artificial intelligence (AI). After the artificial intelligence (AI) has assessed the symptoms, the patient can be triaged to digital healthcare advices, or a chat with a healthcare professional. If needed, the healthcare professional can convert the chat to a telephone or video assessment, or book the patient to a healthcare specialist. The platform can also administer planned consultations with patients or between professionals, it can be used as a tool for the patient to book healthcare appointments, get diagnostics and assessments done, and receive treatment through.

Digital care staff

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The study population will be recruited from both public and private healthcare units (amendment of ethical approval number 2021-04696).The study population will consist of professions such as nurses, physicians, physiotherapists and psychologists and will be recruited from in-patient and out-patient care units. 1000-2000 persons will be offered paticipation in each time period.

You may qualify if:

  • healthcare staff from all clinical areas in the County of Gavleborg
  • staff with permanent employment

You may not qualify if:

  • administrative staff
  • managers
  • staff on long term leave
  • staff on long term sick leave
  • staff on parent leave
  • staff expected to retire or resign within a year

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

County of Gavleborg

Gävle, Gävleborg County, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Ekman B, Thulesius H, Wilkens J, Lindgren A, Cronberg O, Arvidsson E. Utilization of digital primary care in Sweden: Descriptive analysis of claims data on demographics, socioeconomics, and diagnoses. Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

    PMID: 31128825BACKGROUND
  • Gabrielsson-Jarhult F, Kjellstrom S, Josefsson KA. Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users' experiences and care patterns. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Jun;39(2):204-213. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1913904. Epub 2021 May 11.

    PMID: 33974502BACKGROUND
  • Ashwood JS, Mehrotra A, Cowling D, Uscher-Pines L. Direct-To-Consumer Telehealth May Increase Access To Care But Does Not Decrease Spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):485-491. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1130.

    PMID: 28264950BACKGROUND
  • Shah SJ, Schwamm LH, Cohen AB, Simoni MR, Estrada J, Matiello M, Venkataramani A, Rao SK. Virtual Visits Partially Replaced In-Person Visits In An ACO-Based Medical Specialty Practice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2045-2051. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05105.

    PMID: 30633681BACKGROUND
  • Totten AM, Womack DM, Eden KB, McDonagh MS, Griffin JC, Grusing S, Hersh WR. Telehealth: Mapping the Evidence for Patient Outcomes From Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jun. Report No.: 16-EHC034-EF. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379320/

    PMID: 27536752BACKGROUND
  • Fraser H, Coiera E, Wong D. Safety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers. Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2263-2264. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32819-8. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30413281BACKGROUND
  • Kroth PJ, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S, Babbott S, Poplau S, Qeadan F, Parshall C, Corrigan K, Linzer M. Association of Electronic Health Record Design and Use Factors With Clinician Stress and Burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199609. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9609.

    PMID: 31418810BACKGROUND
  • Alami H, Gagnon MP, Fortin JP. Some Multidimensional Unintended Consequences of Telehealth Utilization: A Multi-Project Evaluation Synthesis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):337-352. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.12.

    PMID: 31256566BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Burnout, PsychologicalOccupational StressPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorOccupational DiseasesPersonal Satisfaction

Study Officials

  • Agneta C Larsson, MD, PhD

    County of Gavleborg

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2022

First Posted

January 27, 2022

Study Start

January 17, 2022

Primary Completion

January 12, 2025

Study Completion

August 1, 2025

Last Updated

September 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Due to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and restrictions in ethical approvement, individual data can not be shared. Protocols and statistics not including individual data, can be shared eventually. Informed consent forms can be shared.

Locations